Alas, Kyle's patched kernel does not fix the problem--I continue to
get oopses and hard panics. Also, the problem is fixed by an unpatched
build of 2.6.28 (2.6.28-3.fc10.i686). A closer read of the comments at
the original bug reveals that no one was actually testing just the
patch.
So while this
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:53:12PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> I started this last night, so I could submit it to stable...
>
Forgot to mention this here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1089515
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:30:27AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:20:03AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Pete Zaitcev (zait...@redhat.com) said:
> > > > Intel has produced a patch, and John Linville has applied this to the
> > > > 2.6.28
> > > > kernel (available f
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:20:03AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Pete Zaitcev (zait...@redhat.com) said:
> > > Intel has produced a patch, and John Linville has applied this to the
> > > 2.6.28
> > > kernel (available from koji), but it now sounds like 2.6.28 might not make
> > > it out soon, o
Pete Zaitcev (zait...@redhat.com) said:
> > Intel has produced a patch, and John Linville has applied this to the 2.6.28
> > kernel (available from koji), but it now sounds like 2.6.28 might not make
> > it out soon, or ever. Can this fix be applied to the 2.6.27 branch?
>
> Maybe the -stable tea
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:05:27 -0800, Tom Davidson wrote:
> Intel has produced a patch, and John Linville has applied this to the 2.6.28
> kernel (available from koji), but it now sounds like 2.6.28 might not make
> it out soon, or ever. Can this fix be applied to the 2.6.27 branch?
Maybe the -sta
Hi all,
Bug 470225 crashes systems with Intel 3945/4965/5300 wireless cards on busy
networks. The kernel warning generated is currently the #1 most-reported
item at kerneloops (www.kerneloops.org -- several k reports mostly from FC10
machines)
Intel has produced a patch, and John Linville has app
