On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:44:25 -0400
"John W. Linville" wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 04:35:03PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 04:35:39PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > > Due to backport of patch
> > >
> > > linux
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 04:35:03PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 04:35:39PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > Due to backport of patch
> >
> > linux-2.6-iwl3945-report-killswitch-changes-even-if-the-interface-is-down.patch
> >
> > we
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 04:35:39PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> Due to backport of patch
>
> linux-2.6-iwl3945-report-killswitch-changes-even-if-the-interface-is-down.patch
>
> we have bunch of iwl3945 bugs (race conditions) that are not reproducible
> on vanilla 2.6
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 01:31:47PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 04:35:39PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > Due to backport of patch
> >
> > linux-2.6-iwl3945-report-killswitch-changes-even-if-the-interface-is-down.patch
> >
> > we
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 04:35:39PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> Due to backport of patch
>
> linux-2.6-iwl3945-report-killswitch-changes-even-if-the-interface-is-down.patch
>
> we have bunch of iwl3945 bugs (race conditions) that are not reproducible
> on vanilla 2.6
commit 638d0eb9197d1e285451f6594184fcfc9c2a5d44
Author: Chatre, Reinette
Date: Mon Jan 19 15:30:24 2009 -0800
iwl3945: add debugging for wrong command queue
We encountered a problem related to this BUG and need to obtain more
debugging information. See bug report at
http
to turn radio back on.
---
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c | 17 +++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl3945-base.c
index 5011a79..6065921 100644
--- a/drivers
Due to backport of patch
linux-2.6-iwl3945-report-killswitch-changes-even-if-the-interface-is-down.patch
we have bunch of iwl3945 bugs (race conditions) that are not reproducible
on vanilla 2.6.29. These patches address them (at least some of them).
[PATCH 1/3] iwl3945: release resources before
commit d552bfb65241a35d48e44ddb0d27e0454f579ab4
Author: Kolekar, Abhijeet
Date: Fri Dec 19 10:37:41 2008 +0800
iwl3945: release resources before shutting down
Release resource before shutting down and notify upper stack.
Signed-off-by: Abhijeet Kolekar
Signed-off-by: Zhu Yi
Alas, Kyle's patched kernel does not fix the problem--I continue to
get oopses and hard panics. Also, the problem is fixed by an unpatched
build of 2.6.28 (2.6.28-3.fc10.i686). A closer read of the comments at
the original bug reveals that no one was actually testing just the
patch.
So while this
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:53:12PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> I started this last night, so I could submit it to stable...
>
Forgot to mention this here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1089515
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:30:27AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:20:03AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Pete Zaitcev (zait...@redhat.com) said:
> > > > Intel has produced a patch, and John Linville has applied this to the
> > > > 2.6.28
> > > > kernel (available f
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:20:03AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Pete Zaitcev (zait...@redhat.com) said:
> > > Intel has produced a patch, and John Linville has applied this to the
> > > 2.6.28
> > > kernel (available from koji), but it now sounds like 2.6.28 might not make
> > > it out soon, o
Pete Zaitcev (zait...@redhat.com) said:
> > Intel has produced a patch, and John Linville has applied this to the 2.6.28
> > kernel (available from koji), but it now sounds like 2.6.28 might not make
> > it out soon, or ever. Can this fix be applied to the 2.6.27 branch?
>
> Maybe the -stable tea
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:05:27 -0800, Tom Davidson wrote:
> Intel has produced a patch, and John Linville has applied this to the 2.6.28
> kernel (available from koji), but it now sounds like 2.6.28 might not make
> it out soon, or ever. Can this fix be applied to the 2.6.27 branch?
Maybe the -sta
Hi all,
Bug 470225 crashes systems with Intel 3945/4965/5300 wireless cards on busy
networks. The kernel warning generated is currently the #1 most-reported
item at kerneloops (www.kerneloops.org -- several k reports mostly from FC10
machines)
Intel has produced a patch, and John Linville has app
>>
>> http://people.redhat.com/davej/kernels/Fedora/fc7/
>>
>> Feedback is good as this is a big sticking point for people at the
>> moment.
>
> I bumped up to 3219 late last week and that actually made iwl3945 work for
> me, which it never really did before.
good as this is a big sticking point for people at the
> moment.
I bumped up to 3219 late last week and that actually made iwl3945 work for me,
which it never really did before. It seemed to flake out after some period
(maybe 10-12 hours) where it wouldn't seem to send packets any longe
On 08 Jun 2007 19:41:03 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> "JU" == Jonathan Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JU> So, I was wondering what would be useful information to help debug
JU> this, beyond "it doesn't work very well".
Well, the latest F8 kernels have a ne
> "JU" == Jonathan Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JU> So, I was wondering what would be useful information to help debug
JU> this, beyond "it doesn't work very well".
Well, the latest F8 kernels have a newer version of the iwlwifi
drivers; some folks have reported that it works much be
Hi,
I have a laptop with an ipw3945 wireless adapter and with F7
installed, things are quite flakey. Looking at forums and mailing
lists I see I'm not suffering alone. So, I was wondering what would be
useful information to help debug this, beyond "it doesn't work very
well".
TIA
Jonathan.
21 matches
Mail list logo
