On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 02:31:33PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 02:26:10PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>
> > We could put it in fedora but it's not upstream and nobody can say when or
> if
> > it will go in.
>
> After the long drawn out pain that utrace has been, I'm somew
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 02:26:10PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> We could put it in fedora but it's not upstream and nobody can say when or if
> it will go in.
After the long drawn out pain that utrace has been, I'm somewhat reluctant.
Especially for something that's providing additional userspa
Ted Sume Nzuonkwelle wrote:
Hi,
My apologies if this is going to the wrong mailing list.
Is there an easy way to enable support for perfmon2 in the fedora 9
kernel(s)? Looks like the patch for perfmon2 available at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/perfmon2/
is only useful if patching a vanill
Hi,
My apologies if this is going to the wrong mailing list.
Is there an easy way to enable support for perfmon2 in the fedora 9
kernel(s)? Looks like the patch for perfmon2 available at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/perfmon2/
is only useful if patching a vanilla kernel? Any help and/pointer
