Re: rawhide patches.

2008-09-29 Thread Roland McGrath
> > > These are policy decisions. Probably not going usptream. > > > > Can they be turned into upstream config options? > > They're already runtime settable, so it's primarily a convenience thing > - they're the sensible defaults given our userland. Can the boot defaults be turned into upstream

Re: rawhide patches.

2008-09-29 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 06:59:00PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:47:05AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > > linux-2.6-acpi-video-dos.patch > > > > linux-2.6-defaults-acpi-video.patch > > > > > > These are policy decisions. Probably not going usptream. > > > >

Re: rawhide patches.

2008-09-29 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:47:05AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > linux-2.6-acpi-video-dos.patch > > > linux-2.6-defaults-acpi-video.patch > > > > These are policy decisions. Probably not going usptream. > > Can they be turned into upstream config options? They're already runtime settable, s

Re: rawhide patches.

2008-09-29 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 14:57 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > linux-2.6-net-silence-noisy-printks.patch > linux-2.6-piix3-silence-quirk.patch > linux-2.6-quiet-iommu.patch > linux-2.6-silence-acpi-blacklist.patch > linux-2.6-silence-fbcon-logo.patch > linux-2.6-silence-noise.patch > Fedora local 'h

Re: rawhide patches.

2008-09-29 Thread Roland McGrath
> > linux-2.6-acpi-video-dos.patch > > linux-2.6-defaults-acpi-video.patch > > These are policy decisions. Probably not going usptream. Can they be turned into upstream config options? ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com h

Re: rawhide patches.

2008-09-29 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 02:57:22PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > linux-2.6-acpi-clear-wake-status.patch Upstream. > linux-2.6-acpi-video-dos.patch > linux-2.6-defaults-acpi-video.patch These are policy decisions. Probably not going usptream. > linux-2.6-input-dell-keyboard-keyup.patch Upstream.

Re: rawhide patches.

2008-09-25 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 03:07:04PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Dave Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > linux-2.6-defaults-fat-utf8.patch > >Drop? > > Isn't this a local choice similar to the later ones? The problem is this is a "who do we want to screw over" patch. Some people have

Re: rawhide patches.

2008-09-25 Thread Bill Nottingham
Dave Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > linux-2.6-defaults-fat-utf8.patch > Drop? Isn't this a local choice similar to the later ones? > linux-2.6-net-silence-noisy-printks.patch > linux-2.6-piix3-silence-quirk.patch > linux-2.6-quiet-iommu.patch > linux-2.6-silence-acpi-blacklist.patch > l

rawhide patches.

2008-09-25 Thread Dave Jones
I just sifted through what we had in rawhide, after noticing that ls *.patch was starting to scroll my terminal (which is never a good sign). In doing so, I found a bunch of patches that weren't applied any more that we forgot to remove, and a bunch that were applied that shouldn't have been. Sifti