On Monday 08 August 2005 10:55, JK wrote:
>
> Yes, and No at the same time.
> These are repackaged versions of the ZLib package.
> The version of ZLib for FC1 you have is correct... although, I
> believe I've only seen one security fix in the current one.
> The BUG fixes are nice; but, not a requ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Klinke wrote:
| On Monday 08 August 2005 09:21, James Kosin wrote:
|
|> JAMES' Unofficial Unsupported by RedHat, Redhat Fedora Core, and
|> Redhat Fedora Legacy Groups! ~Any support for my packages,
|> will only come from me! There is no
On Monday 08 August 2005 10:40, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
>
> Nice disclaimer. Unfortunately people don't seem to read it.
Exactly ..
>
> Fedora Legacy has a different policy for security fixes: Patches
> are generally backported to the released version, upgrades to the
> newest version are avoi
On 2005-08-08 10:23:03 -0500, Mike Klinke wrote:
> On Monday 08 August 2005 09:21, James Kosin wrote:
> > JAMES' Unofficial Unsupported by RedHat, Redhat Fedora Core, and
> > Redhat Fedora Legacy Groups!
> > ~Any support for my packages, will only come from me! There
> > is no bugzilla for th
On Monday 08 August 2005 09:21, James Kosin wrote:
> JAMES' Unofficial Unsupported by RedHat, Redhat Fedora Core, and
> Redhat Fedora Legacy Groups!
> ~Any support for my packages, will only come from me! There
> is no bugzilla for the packages, groups may not know what version
> you are tal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
JAMES' Unofficial Unsupported by RedHat, Redhat Fedora Core, and
Redhat Fedora Legacy Groups!
~Any support for my packages, will only come from me! There is no
bugzilla for the packages, groups may not know what version you are
talking about. T
