On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Eric Rostetter wrote:
>
> We have a nfs-config package held up for a similar reason. It was in QA with
> the upstream patch, and it fixes the problem as well as any other patch.
> But a rare case was found where it doesn't fix the problem. Well, why not
> release it like ev
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, James Kosin wrote:
> This may be easier than writing a long detailed email all the time.
> Everyone can get / see updates via my newly created web-page at
> ~http://support.intcomgrp.com/~jkosin
Hi James,
I've looked at your page and like the page. I guess I am one of t
> Josep L. Guallar-Esteve wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 September 2005 11:21, James Kosin wrote:
> >
> >>I'm not knocking RedHat, Fedora or Fedora-Legacy this is a good
> >>point. But, some of us need more than just patches to get us by.
> >>I know, If you really want the latest, why not update to F
Josep L. Guallar-Esteve wrote:
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 11:21, James Kosin wrote:
I'm not knocking RedHat, Fedora or Fedora-Legacy this is a good
point. But, some of us need more than just patches to get us by.
I know, If you really want the latest, why not update to FC4... The
problem
--On Wednesday, September 28, 2005 8:31 PM -0400 Tom Diehl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I do not know where you got the impression that RHEL only gets security
updates but that is not true. What is true is that whatever version of a
particular package a given version of RHEL is released with is t
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 11:21, James Kosin wrote:
> I'm not knocking RedHat, Fedora or Fedora-Legacy this is a good
> point. But, some of us need more than just patches to get us by.
> I know, If you really want the latest, why not update to FC4... The
> problem there is that this is a ser
