On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 12:29 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 01:58:50PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Where "Fedora Legacy" is mentioned, couple it with "The Community
> > Maintenance Project". IE "Fedora Legacy, the Community Maintenance
> > Project".
>
> That makes people as
I also would be interested in an up-to-date redhat9 iso's if there is such a
thing.
Thank you,
Eydrian Flanegin
TheServerExperts.com
Phone: 00-(297)-5657644
Fax: 00-(297)-5889072
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seroe Blanco 20-A, Suite 6
Oranjestad, 297
Aruba, AW
This email (including all attachments) is t
Hi
Although the word "maintenance" does seem to have some negative conno-
tations, it's hard for me to come up with a better word that describes our
purpose and activities. What could the spin doctors can do here? Could
we substitute the word "stewardship" for "maintenance"?
Possibly yes.
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> >
> > Hi Rahul, I just browsed through some fedora-devel-list posts from
> > this month, so far all I see is two people in a thread: "RFE: Retire
> > Fedora Core 4 only _after_ FC6 has been released." who mention that
> > they think "legac
Hi
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legacy/
I have improved the content as well as look and feel of the wiki page to
match other project pages within our Fedora Project wiki. I have also
included the information that Fedora Legacy is now a official Fedora
Project supported by the Fedora Foundati
-
Fedora Legacy Test Update Notification
FEDORALEGACY-2006-177326
Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177326
2006-01-19
-
Name:
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 21:39 +1000, Ronald Bradford wrote:
> I've been able to update everything to current packages under 7.3
> however in more reading I see this still doesn't cut it.
Why doesn't this cut it? Fedora Legacy still maintains RHL7.3.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 11:15:53PM +1000, Ronald Bradford wrote:
> I use CentOS 4.2, however the machine is a dedicated host located in a
> data centre in Texas, so I'm limited to Operating systems provided as I
> have no physical access.
> They do provide RHEL (which is great) a moderate cost
I use CentOS 4.2, however the machine is a dedicated host located in a
data centre in Texas, so I'm limited to Operating systems provided as I
have no physical access.
They do provide RHEL (which is great) a moderate cost for upgrade,
however it's a clean wipe, and with 30+ web sites, the downti
On Jan 19, 2006, at 7:39 AM, Ronald Bradford wrote:
My apologies, I thought my system was RedHat 9. it was kernel
2.4.20-18.7I did a google on 2.4.20 and it came back with
references to 9.
Seems my assumptions when I got the server years ago was wrong, and
it is indeed 7.3
I've been
My apologies, I thought my system was RedHat 9. it was kernel
2.4.20-18.7I did a google on 2.4.20 and it came back with references
to 9.
Seems my assumptions when I got the server years ago was wrong, and it
is indeed 7.3
I've been able to update everything to current packages under 7.3
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 01:58:50PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Where "Fedora Legacy" is mentioned, couple it with "The Community
> Maintenance Project". IE "Fedora Legacy, the Community Maintenance
> Project".
That makes people associate it with "FCX is transferred from the company
supported pr
Hi,
I'm following the instructions at
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legacy/Yum9Detailed to upgrade yum on
my RH9 machine so I can further update the system for glib23 which I can
then use for MySQL 5.1
rpm -Uvh
http://download.fedoralegacy.org/redhat/9/updates/i386/gnupg-1.2.1-9.i386.r
13 matches
Mail list logo
