Well,
Your script appears to be more detailed than my own. Mine's based on PHP,
yours is perl. But yum is written in python, and that's probably the language
that should be used for a FL "maintainer" RPM. Of course, what we have now
outta come first.
Question for the group: is this the direc
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 17:18 -0600, David Eisenstein wrote:
Problem is, there are no repodata subdirectories in any of the os
directories off of download.fedoralegacy.org (e.g., /fedora/3/os/i386/,
/fedora/3/os/SRPMS/).
Whoops, my bad. Fixing right now.
You might want to
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 17:18 -0600, David Eisenstein wrote:
>
> Problem is, there are no repodata subdirectories in any of the os
> directories off of download.fedoralegacy.org (e.g., /fedora/3/os/i386/,
> /fedora/3/os/SRPMS/).
Whoops, my bad. Fixing right now.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.
On Jan 21, 2006, at 7:18 PM, David Eisenstein wrote:
Hi,
Please correct me if I am wrong, but my understanding is that Fedora
Legacy maintains "repodata" in its directories so that users who have
upgraded their yum program to version 2.2+ can still use yum for
updating
their systems or insta
Hi,
Please correct me if I am wrong, but my understanding is that Fedora
Legacy maintains "repodata" in its directories so that users who have
upgraded their yum program to version 2.2+ can still use yum for updating
their systems or installing software they hadn't previously installed?
Proble
On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 23:07 -0600, David Eisenstein wrote:
>
> Is this something that everyone who contributes to Fedora Legacy will be
> required to do, especially now that Fedora Legacy is officially part of
> the Fedora Foundation? If so, does that need to be documented in the
> Fedora Lega
Hi
Fedora Foundation does not mention anything about that. It has no say
or control over who provides support services for Fedora as far as I
know. The foundation is a overall management and delegation authority.
It can bless, reject existing or proposed Fedora Projects or choose to
shutdow
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006, Stuart Low wrote:
You were thinking exactly what I was thinking and I hadn't been checking
my mail. :(
FWIW, I think this is the direction we need to go to if we want Fedora
Legacy to (remain/become) relevant.
It's just way too much fuss to get:
1) packages proposed
2)
