On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Benjamin Smith wrote:
1) What testing packages are installed that you'd even care about?
2) What changes should I test for?
3) Looks good, how do I report it?
So, I wrote a script to at least tell me what packages were officially
"testing" and which were released. And, it see
On Monday 06 February 2006 15:17, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Just installing the package is not enough. I could do that myself on
> the build server and call it good. The package actually needs to be
> used and that requires human interaction.
Jesse,
I have a Fedora Core 1 server that I use fairly
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 15:09 -0800, Benjamin Smith wrote:
> In short, give us a URI template that we can write a script to go to in order
> to report packages that are in test that are installed, and we'll happily
> make it easy to setup/use. Making it easier to do will result in more people
> do
The process of QA testing is a pain, and fraught with potential errors.
I see no reason why this should be - two members of this list have come up
with a good foundation for scripts that automate much of the process of
determining test packages that are installed. Both parties (myself being one
Am Mo, den 06.02.2006 schrieb Deepan Chakravarthy um 20:40:
> Am running FC3 now.. i want to upgrade the kernel
> alone without upgrading to FC4. how do i go about?
Please do not hijack another list thread by replying to a different mail
while starting a new topic.
yum update
`man yum' for de
hi,
Am running FC3 now.. i want to upgrade the kernel
alone without upgrading to FC4. how do i go about?
Thanks
---
Deepan Chakravarthy N
http://users.kaski-net.net/~deepan/
__
Do Y
Am Mo, den 06.02.2006 schrieb Will Lane um 7:52:
> I have a RH9 box happily chugging away running sendmail 8.12.8 for
> the last 2 years. It is setup under the legacy project yum and is up to
> date with the legacy project's patches. So my question is, is this
> secure? Even thought 8.12
Gene Heskett wrote:
This has about worn me out, to the extent that I'm looking for another
email agent that can fetch from the local /var/spool/mail/user
spoolfile fetchmail uses, run it thru SA, and deposit it for
reading in
the /root/Mail directory 100% compatible with the kmail way of doin
Greetings;
This has about worn me out, to the extent that I'm looking for another
email agent that can fetch from the local /var/spool/mail/user
spoolfile fetchmail uses, run it thru SA, and deposit it for reading in
the /root/Mail directory 100% compatible with the kmail way of doing
things.
