Eric Rostetter wrote:
Quoting Michael Kratz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I just (yum) updated sendmail on a Redhat 7.3 box, and the RPM
overwrote my sendmail.cf file and didn't create a .rpmnew or .rpmsave!
Lucky I still had my custom .mc file and it didn't overwrite that.
Can you tell what was diff
Quoting Michael Kratz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I just (yum) updated sendmail on a Redhat 7.3 box, and the RPM
overwrote my sendmail.cf file and didn't create a .rpmnew or .rpmsave!
Lucky I still had my custom .mc file and it didn't overwrite that.
Can you tell what was different between the old .
Quoting Michal Jaegermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I am not sure in which distro /usr/sbin/alternatives showed up
for the first time.
It first showed up in RHL 7.3 as far as RHL goes. It originated in
debian though...
*** ERROR: FEATURE() should be before MAILER()
*** ERROR: FEATURE() should be
Quoting Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I had verified votes for all the platforms.
True.
I also had LOTS of people
asking when a release would come out, again and again.
Should not be relevent, especially if there is one in updates-testing.
Unfortunately
sendmail is one of those real
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 22:09 -0600, Eric Rostetter wrote:
>
> This sounds like what happens when we rush the QA processes...
>
> I've stopped trying to do QA because by the time I download the testing
> version, install it, and start testing it, and well before I can submit
> a report, the package
Quoting Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 16:17 -0600, Mike Klinke wrote:
There is instead an entry in /usr/lib; "sendmail.sendmail" which
is linked to /usr/sbin/sendmail. Also the man pages no longer work
if you type; "man sendmail" You have to use "man
sendmail.send
Jesse Keating wrote:
This sounds like the Alternatives system got confused and wasn't making
the links that it was supposed to, as stated in the spec file. Hrm.
FYI:
I just (yum) updated sendmail on a Redhat 7.3 box, and the RPM overwrote
my sendmail.cf file and didn't create a .rpmnew or
On Friday 24 March 2006 16:41, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
> This sounds like the Alternatives system got confused and wasn't
> making the links that it was supposed to, as stated in the spec
> file. Hrm.
I see three missing links on RH9 and FC1;
/usr/lib/sendmail
/usr/share/man/man8/sendmail.8.gz
On Friday 24 March 2006 18:44, David Rees wrote:
>On 3/24/06, Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What the hecks the matter with you folks? Take Take Take, but never
>> give back in kind. I just raised the speed limit to about 90% of my
>> bandwidth, but thats still not enough to feed other
On 3/24/06, Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What the hecks the matter with you folks? Take Take Take, but never
> give back in kind. I just raised the speed limit to about 90% of my
> bandwidth, but thats still not enough to feed other hungry torrents.
> So if you have it, give it back
On Friday 24 March 2006 16:48, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
>
> /usr/sbin/alternatives was supposed to take care of that. If you
> will do 'rpm -q --scripts sendmail' then you should see, among
> other things, something of that sort:
>
> /usr/sbin/alternatives --install /usr/sbin/sendmail mta \
>
Greetings;
Do I have to switch all machines on the net at the same time?
I was under the impresssion that cifs was backwards compatible with
samba for most of its features.
I tried to switch just this one to cifs and I'm getting perms problems I
believe. The other box that was the target I wa
Gene Heskett wrote:
What the hecks the matter with you folks? Take Take Take, but never
give back in kind. I just raised the speed limit to about 90% of my
bandwidth, but thats still not enough to feed other hungry torrents.
So if you have it, give it back. Fire up that client and share!
Whe
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 08:21:15AM +1000, Michael Mansour wrote:
> > On Friday 24 March 2006 12:54, David Eisner wrote:
> >
> > There is instead an entry in /usr/lib; "sendmail.sendmail" which
> > is linked to /usr/sbin/sendmail. Also the man pages no longer work
> > if you type; "man sendmai
Mike Klinke wrote:
On Friday 24 March 2006 12:54, David Eisner wrote:
Just a heads up: after installing the
sendmail-8.12.11-4.24.1.legacy package on a RH9 machine today, I
noticed /usr/lib/sendmail was gone. This will break anything
that's expecting it to be there.
In my case, symlinking /us
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 16:17 -0600, Mike Klinke wrote:
> There is instead an entry in /usr/lib; "sendmail.sendmail" which
> is linked to /usr/sbin/sendmail. Also the man pages no longer work
> if you type; "man sendmail" You have to use "man
> sendmail.sendmail".
This sounds like the Alterna
On Friday 24 March 2006 17:14, Jesse Keating wrote:
>On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 16:11 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Don't take me wrong, I have appreciated attempts to help, but the
>> mailserver lags have rendered its usefullness to somewhere in the
>> range of that of tits on a boar hog since FC5 was
Hi,
> On Friday 24 March 2006 12:54, David Eisner wrote:
>
> > Just a heads up: after installing the
> > sendmail-8.12.11-4.24.1.legacy package on a RH9 machine today, I
> > noticed /usr/lib/sendmail was gone. This will break anything
> > that's expecting it to be there.
> >
> > In my case, symli
On Friday 24 March 2006 12:54, David Eisner wrote:
> Just a heads up: after installing the
> sendmail-8.12.11-4.24.1.legacy package on a RH9 machine today, I
> noticed /usr/lib/sendmail was gone. This will break anything
> that's expecting it to be there.
>
> In my case, symlinking /usr/lib/sendm
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 16:11 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Don't take me wrong, I have appreciated attempts to help, but the
> mailserver lags have rendered its usefullness to somewhere in the range
> of that of tits on a boar hog since FC5 was released.
Red Hat upgraded the mailman software over
On Friday 24 March 2006 06:10, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit Internet) wrote:
>Jeff Sheltren wrote:
>> On Mar 23, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> Yum is rather continuously erroring out on fedora extras, both
>>> branches
>>> recently. Do I need to edit that line and send it someplace else
>>>
Just a heads up: after installing the sendmail-8.12.11-4.24.1.legacy
package on a RH9 machine today, I noticed /usr/lib/sendmail was gone.
This will break anything that's expecting it to be there.
In my case, symlinking /usr/lib/sendmail --> /usr/sbin/sendmail fixed
the problem.
-David
Marc
On Friday 24 March 2006 05:49, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 23 March 2006 14:00, seth vidal wrote:
> >On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 07:37 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> Greetings;
> >>
> >> Yum is rather continuously erroring out on fedora extras, both
> >> branches recently. Do I need to edit that
On 2006-03-23 23:49:53 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Received: from listman.util.phx.redhat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
> by listman.util.phx.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
> k2OH5hkP031529;
> Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:06:05 -0500
^
> Receive
On Thu, March 23, 2006 6:09 pm, David Eisenstein wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Adam Gibson wrote:
>> BTW... legacy email list takes 7+ hours for list emails to get to me so
>> I didn't see the announcement before I sent my original email. I have
>> noticed this for the past few days(before my patc
David Eisenstein wrote:
Hi Adam,
One of the reasons your original post with the patch didn't make it out on
the list yet is that it was around 70 kiB in size, and the list software
is set up to allow only 40kiB without moderation. So it is being held for
moderation. We can either release that
Jeff Sheltren wrote:
On Mar 23, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Yum is rather continuously erroring out on fedora extras, both
branches
recently. Do I need to edit that line and send it someplace else
now?
Gene, as far as I know Fedora Extras has only ever been FC3 and
up. What
On Thursday 23 March 2006 14:00, seth vidal wrote:
>On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 07:37 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Greetings;
>>
>> Yum is rather continuously erroring out on fedora extras, both
>> branches recently. Do I need to edit that line and send it
>> someplace else now?
>
>you need to tell us
I agree,
it would be nice to have an update ;)
I keep running:
yum -y update sendmail
;)
Cheers
Oliver
Pekka Savola wrote:
Hi,
I hope FL core has had preliminary warning of the just-released
sendmail remote vulnerability and if something has already been
done about it, even better..
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Adam Gibson wrote:
> Adam Gibson wrote:
> ...
> > This has been working since yesterday around 4pm EST on a medium load
> > server without issues.
> >
> > The offical 8.12.11 patch which does not apply properly on 8.12.8 is on
> > the main sendmail.org site for reference.
>
On Mar 23, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings;
Yum is rather continuously erroring out on fedora extras, both
branches
recently. Do I need to edit that line and send it someplace else now?
Gene, as far as I know Fedora Extras has only ever been FC3 and up.
What URL(s) ar
31 matches
Mail list logo
