Re: New sendmail and missing /usr/lib/sendmail

2006-03-27 Thread Marc Deslauriers
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 10:47 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > These issues should be resolved in the newer packages in > updates-testing. They're not in updates-testing yet. They're still awaiting PUBLISH votes in bugzilla. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186277 Marc. signatu

Re: Sendmail stuff-up

2006-03-27 Thread Mike Klinke
On Monday 27 March 2006 13:31, Paul Welsh wrote: > Well, I applied the latest patch to my Sendmail config and have > managed to stuff it up well and truly.  I am running RH9 and > Sendmail 8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8. The latest patch or the rpm? If the rpm that was released, you should see "sendmai

Sendmail stuff-up

2006-03-27 Thread Paul Welsh
Well, I applied the latest patch to my Sendmail config and have managed to stuff it up well and truly. I am running RH9 and Sendmail 8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8. SMTP authentication stopped working first and in trying to fix it I managed to tie myself in knots. I ended up with errors like this: Mar

Re: New sendmail and missing /usr/lib/sendmail

2006-03-27 Thread James Kosin
Jesse Keating wrote: On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 13:43 -0500, James Kosin wrote: Sounds like something didn't get built correctly. Was this a new release of sendmail or a patch? I believe my packages needed (or at least I let them build a -cf package) at one point. My version has been working fo

Re: New sendmail and missing /usr/lib/sendmail

2006-03-27 Thread Jesse Keating
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 13:43 -0500, James Kosin wrote: > Sounds like something didn't get built correctly. Was this a new > release of sendmail or a patch? > I believe my packages needed (or at least I let them build a -cf > package) at one point. My version has been working for some time with

Re: New sendmail and missing /usr/lib/sendmail

2006-03-27 Thread James Kosin
Jesse Keating wrote: On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 16:17 -0600, Mike Klinke wrote: There is instead an entry in /usr/lib; "sendmail.sendmail" which is linked to /usr/sbin/sendmail. Also the man pages no longer work if you type; "man sendmail" You have to use "man sendmail.sendmail". This

Re: New sendmail and missing /usr/lib/sendmail

2006-03-27 Thread Mike McCarty
Eric Rostetter wrote: Quoting Marc Deslauriers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Curiously, sendmail actually DID get test votes for all platforms before it got moved to official updates. No part of the QA process was hastened. True, for the _current_ QA process. But not for the original QA process. I

Re: New sendmail and missing /usr/lib/sendmail

2006-03-27 Thread Mike McCarty
Marc Deslauriers wrote: On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 23:48 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote: Ah, now we get down to the nitty gritty of the desire to hasten the process of going from a Test state to a Release state. Hopefully, those who in past have seen no need to maintain a policy of "no package can move f

Re: New sendmail and missing /usr/lib/sendmail

2006-03-27 Thread Eric Rostetter
Quoting Marc Deslauriers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Curiously, sendmail actually DID get test votes for all platforms before it got moved to official updates. No part of the QA process was hastened. True, for the _current_ QA process. But not for the original QA process. The main problem I've had

Re: Hi all

2006-03-27 Thread Eric Rostetter
Quoting S Theyagarajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi people, iam S.Theyagarajan, a sophomore at National Institute Of technology trichy India. Iam glad to join in here. and i have been in to many opensource projects. and i just found there are some vacancies. I love writing technical

Re: New sendmail and missing /usr/lib/sendmail

2006-03-27 Thread Jesse Keating
On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 22:16 -0600, Eric Rostetter wrote: > All I know is that in bug 186277 it says: > > > Comment #13 From Jesse Keating on 2006-03-23 11:58 EST [reply] > >I did have advance notice and I was on vendor-sec. However like > > you said this > > was a hard hole

Re: New sendmail and missing /usr/lib/sendmail

2006-03-27 Thread Eric Rostetter
Quoting Mike McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I think that everybody should send Jesse big thanks for preparing I'll second that, as well. Mike Depsite any differences I have with the Fedora Legacy Project, I very much appreciate all that Jesse has done for the project. Without him there wouldn

Re: Hi all

2006-03-27 Thread Josep L. Guallar-Esteve
On Monday 27 March 2006 08:04, S Theyagarajan wrote: > Hi people, > iam S.Theyagarajan, a sophomore at National Institute > Of technology trichy India. > Iam glad to join in here. and i have been in to many opensource > projects. and i just found there are some vacancies. > > I love

Re: New sendmail and missing /usr/lib/sendmail

2006-03-27 Thread Marc Deslauriers
On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 23:48 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote: > Ah, now we get down to the nitty gritty of the desire to hasten > the process of going from a Test state to a Release state. Hopefully, > those who in past have seen no need to maintain a policy of "no package > can move from Test state to Re

Hi all

2006-03-27 Thread S Theyagarajan
Hi people, iam S.Theyagarajan, a sophomore at National Institute Of technology trichy India. Iam glad to join in here. and i have been in to many opensource projects. and i just found there are some vacancies. I love writing technical documentations and security management. I would