-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Yates wrote:
On Mon, 15 May 2006, James Kosin wrote:
I agree with Jesse here; but, I would like to add that the
packages should be tested on the released platform by someone and
not just released in this case. SendMail was a recent blunder
Quoting James Kosin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
not to start any kind of flame war, but just for accuracy's sake,
the recent sendmail release *was* tested before public release - i
Yes, but IMHO not enough, but that is totally another matter.
that may say that our required testing is insufficient; i
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 11:01 -0500, Eric Rostetter wrote:
As can be seen in the sendmail upgrade, lots of other things (alternatives,
pam, etc) can come into play that are not immediately obvious.
Right, thinks like sendmail are hard. Things like gaim, or evince, or
other top level
