Quoting Jesse Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 14:47, Eric Rostetter wrote:
If Jesse approves, I can put the same notice on the fedoralegacy.org
web site...
Please do.
I copied the wiki text to the website... I'm not happy with the way
it looks, so I'll try to impro
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 04:42:36PM -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
> >Now, let me get started on migrating those last servers running legacy
> >versions of Fedora Core...
> Migrating them to what? That's my question.
If you can't upgrade every year (or ideally, twice year), CentOS is the
clear answer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Dec 12, 2006, at 4:48 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 15:45, Jesse Keating wrote:
If Jesse approves, I can put the same notice on the fedoralegacy.org
web site...
Please do.
And once done, I suppose I draft something up
Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
I was just thinking out loud really. I don't expect it is possible to
revive the Legacy Project at this point, but was just thinking that
maybe trying to get companies that build on Fedora (not just Fedora
Legacy) to supply resources might be a good idea. I
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 15:45, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > If Jesse approves, I can put the same notice on the fedoralegacy.org
> > web site...
>
> Please do.
And once done, I suppose I draft something up for the announce list.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Tea
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 14:47, Eric Rostetter wrote:
> If Jesse approves, I can put the same notice on the fedoralegacy.org
> web site...
Please do.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/
Quoting Jeff Sheltren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I agree, and I've changed the Legacy page on the wiki. If someone can
think of a better way to put it, please let me know.
-Jeff
If Jesse approves, I can put the same notice on the fedoralegacy.org
web site...
--
Eric Rostetter
The Department of Ph
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 01:46:21PM +0100, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
> like Plesk. Yes, you're reading that right: Plesk is still supported
> on FC1. They don't tell you that FC1 itself has been EOL for some
> time now. Note that Plesk is not particularly unique in this...
Totally. This i
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 10:20, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
I agree and we could just end it at that and say we don't care
everybody and their dog is running unpatched systems. But has anyone
ever tried contacting these big companies and explaining the
situation to m
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 10:20, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
> I agree and we could just end it at that and say we don't care
> everybody and their dog is running unpatched systems. But has anyone
> ever tried contacting these big companies and explaining the
> situation to maybe get so
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 07:49, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
Most of the dedicated hosting sites that offer Fedora don't mention a
version on the front page, but I tried diving a little, and it seems
that most of them may still be offering 3 and 4. I found one 5, but
still n
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 07:49, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
> Most of the dedicated hosting sites that offer Fedora don't mention a
> version on the front page, but I tried diving a little, and it seems
> that most of them may still be offering 3 and 4. I found one 5, but
> still no 6.
>
> For a li
Jeff Sheltren wrote:
On Dec 12, 2006, at 5:32 AM, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
Well, apparently some hosting companies, like 1&1, are still offering
their customers Fedora Core 4.
http://tinyurl.com/y4q3j3
http://tinyurl.com/y7pj9r
I guess we should try to make things more obvious, or we may be
OK, there are quite a few other Fedora Core 4 offers:
http://www.valueweb.com/dedicated/dsLinux.htm
Most of the dedicated hosting sites that offer Fedora don't mention a
version on the front page, but I tried diving a little, and it seems
that most of them may still be offering 3 and 4. I found o
Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
Well, apparently some hosting companies, like 1&1, are still offering
their customers Fedora Core 4.
http://tinyurl.com/y4q3j3
http://tinyurl.com/y7pj9r
I guess we should try to make things more obvious, or we may be
jeopardizing several servers on the Internet...
1&
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 06:54 -0400, Jeff Sheltren wrote:
> I Roozbeh, do you mean more obvious than what is currently on the wiki?
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legacy
Well, yes, we need to make people aware of the situation. There may be
other hosting companies, and even if there are no other of
On Dec 12, 2006, at 5:32 AM, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
Well, apparently some hosting companies, like 1&1, are still offering
their customers Fedora Core 4.
http://tinyurl.com/y4q3j3
http://tinyurl.com/y7pj9r
I guess we should try to make things more obvious, or we may be
jeopardizing several se
Well, apparently some hosting companies, like 1&1, are still offering
their customers Fedora Core 4.
http://tinyurl.com/y4q3j3
http://tinyurl.com/y7pj9r
I guess we should try to make things more obvious, or we may be
jeopardizing several servers on the Internet...
Roozbeh
--
fedora-legacy-list
Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 05:56:42PM -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
We can't and shouldn't announce anything on core/extra's behalf, we
just need to say that the current model is being reorganized and while
doing so distributions X, Y, Z have effectively fallen out of
maintenanc
19 matches
Mail list logo
