Jesse Keating wrote:
On Friday 05 January 2007 11:11, Paul Rupe wrote:
I understand that no one is making updates for 7.2 anymore, so I was
wondering if I can adapt the one for 7.3. The timezone rules are part of
the glibc packages. Do I really need the new version of glibc, or can I
simply
Nils Breunese (Lemonbit Internet) wrote:
If you really don't like upgrading your OS every couple of months I'd
backup my data and do a fresh install of CentOS 4.4. However, CentOS 5
will be out in 6 months... :o) No immediate need to upgrade then
though as CentOS 4.x will get full updates until
Anyone know if this is being worked on?
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-1173
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
David Eisenstein wrote:
Adam Gibson wrote:
Adam Gibson wrote:
One thing I noticed after the latest yum update of sendmail from the
previous update is that alternatives is broken for /etc/pam.d/smtp for
the sendmail package. <>
So basically it boils down to alternatives with the
Adam Gibson wrote:
One thing I noticed after the latest yum update of sendmail from the
previous update is that alternatives is broken for /etc/pam.d/smtp for
the sendmail package. Sendmail used to create /etc/pam.d/smtp.sendmail
which alternatives would create a symlink at /etc/pam.d/smtp to
One thing I noticed after the latest yum update of sendmail from the
previous update is that alternatives is broken for /etc/pam.d/smtp for
the sendmail package. Sendmail used to create /etc/pam.d/smtp.sendmail
which alternatives would create a symlink at /etc/pam.d/smtp to
eventually point to
David Eisenstein wrote:
Hi Adam,
One of the reasons your original post with the patch didn't make it out on
the list yet is that it was around 70 kiB in size, and the list software
is set up to allow only 40kiB without moderation. So it is being held for
moderation. We can either release that
Adam Gibson wrote:
...
This has been working since yesterday around 4pm EST on a medium load
server without issues.
The offical 8.12.11 patch which does not apply properly on 8.12.8 is on
the main sendmail.org site for reference.
Anyone here any new news about an official legacy patch
http://www.sendmail.com/company/advisory/index.shtml
"Sendmail, Inc. has recently become aware of a security vulnerability in
certain versions of sendmail Mail Transfer Agent (MTA) and UNIX and
Linux products that contain it. Sendmail was notified by security
researchers at ISS that, under so
Jesse Keating wrote:
So I'm kicking around this idea to help w/ QA testing. What if Fedora
Legacy provided very base images of the releases we support for use with
vmplayer? Vmplayer is free, and from the base image a QA tester could
update to the package we need QA on, use the package in vario
10 matches
Mail list logo
