Re: [FC3] glibc problem with yum

2006-08-09 Thread Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net
From: "Jesse Keating" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Yes, bug report opened. And this error exists already for a few months and >> many systems with "yum" have this trouble. >> I believe i seen FC1-FC3 and even RHEL3/4 and CentOS >What is it trying to install? You already have glibc installed, I'm not >g

Re: [FC3] glibc problem with yum

2006-08-09 Thread Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net
From: "Jesse Keating" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Ugh, cpanel. Well, I have no idea what they're trying to do with glibc, you >obviously have it installed. Perhaps its looking for a specific version that >maybe they provide? Have you followed their instructions to the letter, on >the exact version of

Re: [FC3] glibc problem with yum

2006-08-09 Thread Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net
From: "Jesse Keating" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Duplicate packages? Why so much in size different? How to solve my problem >> that an application cant find a proper glibc. >Note that one is glibc compiled for i386, and one is glibc compiled >specifically for i686. They are two different packages.

[FC3] glibc problem with yum

2006-08-09 Thread Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net
yum info glibc : [...cut...] Name : glibc Arch : i686 Version: 2.3.6 Release: 0.fc3.1 Size : 12 M Repo : installed Summary: The GNU libc libraries. [...cut...] Available Packages Name : glibc Arch : i386 Version: 2.3.6 Release: 0.fc3.1 Size : 4.2 M Repo : legacy-updates Summary: The GNU libc libra

FC3 (j)whois on .eu fails

2006-04-10 Thread Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net
Hi, I have : jwhois-3.2.2-6.FC3.1 And whois on .eu fails (falling back to default whois server). When i add in jwhois.conf the following line : "\\.eu$" = "whois.eu"; Then it works. Time for an jwhois package update? Danny. -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@redha

Re: New sendmail and missing /usr/lib/sendmail

2006-03-25 Thread Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net
From: "Michael Kratz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> overwrote my sendmail.cf file and didn't create a .rpmnew or .rpmsave! My sendmail on FC3 boxes also not working correctly. mailq was set as mailq.sendmail. newaliases was set as newaliases.sendmail And maybe more is very wrong with this package

klogd and syslogd high load usage

2006-03-15 Thread Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net
On a system (FC3) the load usage on klogd and syslogd are very high and running all the time. I have reniced them to 19 and system loads gets back to below 1.00 and stays stable. The box was last week 1 hour not reachable because those 2 produced a (last known) load of minimal 600. The logfiles at

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-10 Thread Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net
From: "Rex Dieter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Where it ends? FC is not a good choice for production. > > Easy: If you don't like that, don't use FC for production. Nice advertising line.. put it on the FC website in big red letters :) Danny. -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@re

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-10 Thread Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net
From: "Mike McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>Can someone provide a new version of X-Chat in legacy updates fc3 repo? > >>Probably not. legacy updates is for security and critical bug fixes only. > > Hmm that sucks. > That's the mission. You *did* read the mission statement, didn't you? Nope. I

Re: X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-08 Thread Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net
From: "Rex Dieter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Can someone provide a new version of X-Chat in legacy updates fc3 repo? > Probably not. legacy updates is for security and critical bug fixes only. Hmm that sucks. Not 1 of all the FC3 repo's providing a new version. I use RH since 5.0. But sinds Fed

X-Chat 2.4.0 to 2.6

2006-03-08 Thread Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net
Can someone provide a new version of X-Chat in legacy updates fc3 repo? its still at 2.4.0 but newest is in 2.6. Thank you. Danny. -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

Re: Announces

2006-02-24 Thread Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net
From: "Nils Breunese (Lemonbit Internet)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Did you add your own .repo file to /etc/yum.repos.d/ or did you add > the info to /etc/yum.conf? Or did you download the rpm that installs > the repo file? I add them manual as .repo at yum.repos.d > Some repositories don't mix

Re: Announces

2006-02-24 Thread Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net
From: "Nils Breunese (Lemonbit Internet)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Update: mozilla-nss.i386 37:1.7.12-1.3.3.legacy - legacy-updates > > ?. Those and some others i did get today and dont see it on any > > anounce list > > i am subscribed to. > I did get those announces... Could you say me on what

Re: Announces

2006-02-24 Thread Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net
From: "Nils Breunese (Lemonbit Internet)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > At the legacy announce list i see only package update messages for > > Legacy Test. > > At the fedora announce list i only see for some time now only FC4 > > updated packages. > > > > Where do i see (mailing list) a list of the legac

Announces

2006-02-24 Thread Danny Terweij - Net Tuning | Net
At the legacy announce list i see only package update messages for Legacy Test. At the fedora announce list i only see for some time now only FC4 updated packages.   Where do i see (mailing list) a list of the legacy FC3 new/updated announces? A mixed one is okay too with FC1/2/3 and up.   D