I needs some source QA, then to be built. The SRPMs have been made and
posted to bugzilla.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew
Miller
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 8:09 AM
To: Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project
Subject: Re: O
New RPMs are in the QA process right now. You're welcome to download the SRPM
that has been created for FC4, compile it, test it, and report on your test.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209116
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Russ Lav
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:fedora-legacy-list-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jesse Keating
> Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 8:44 PM
> To: Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project
> Subject: Meeting results
>
> A proposal was made in the meeting tonight / last n
I'm all for letting it be. The age of those two versions is starting to
show, and I don't think I would encourage people who don't absolutely
require those versions to keep them.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:fedora-legacy-list-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Da
> - -1 from me (and I actually do some package QA for FC1). No
> threat involved, but if FC1 is dropped, I will have no
> further incentive not to upgrade the only remaining Fedora
> box I have deployed to Centos.
I think that's the point. FC isn't supposed to be never-ending for the
FC rele
Ah, so I'm jumping the gun a little bit :) That's fine, I just wanted to see
which way the wind was blowing.
On Monday 20 March 2006 11:01, Donald Maner wrote:
> With the release of FC5, I figured I'd start the discussion to gauge the
>
With the release of FC5, I figured I'd start the discussion
to gauge the amount of support for keeping FC2 updates going.
As specified in the FAQ, Fedora Legacy will pick it
up and maintain it for two additional Fedora Core release cycles.
I believe FC1 still has the following to warrant
co
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Jesse Keating
> Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 10:21 PM
> To: fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
> Subject: Rebuild exisitng errata for x86_64?
> So I guess the bottom line question is, is there a
> sign
I gotta say, that I tried to use the currently available Server beta,
and I wasn't impressed. My VMs would lock up on boot. I just went back
to using GSX server (after I screwed up my ESX server and decided to
export the VMs to use in GSX).
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the discussion of using VMware to help with the QA
process, I felt I should speak up and add my experience over the past week
getting a fc2 and fc3 vm going.
The biggest problem I came across was that I had to
recompile the fc2 and fc3 kernels to reduce the HZ setting in
include/asm-i386
s
my first real participation in any community project.
7.
pub 1024D/9CE7DA52 2006-02-11 Donald Maner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key fingerprint = 9DAC 6B6C DAB8 D3CD 6FE7 91B0 A713 0F28 9CE7
DA52
sub 1024g/21881B61 2006-02-11 [expires: 2007-02-11]
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fe
11 matches
Mail list logo
