Re: New packages

Jesse Keating wrote: On Monday 11 June 2007 19:11:00 Martin Marques wrote: Are new packages still getting in FL? I saw some updates appear last week for FC3 (xorg and mozilla I think). No. Sorry, just figured out that /var/log/yum.log didn't rotate. -- 21:50:04 up 2 days, 9:07, 0

New packages

Are new packages still getting in FL? I saw some updates appear last week for FC3 (xorg and mozilla I think). -- 21:50:04 up 2 days, 9:07, 0 users, load average: 0.92, 0.37, 0.18 - Lic. Martín Marqués | SELECT 'mmarques' || Ce

Re: RHEL subset of which FC ?

Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote: P. Martinez wrote: Hi, is it true when i say, FC3 == RHEL4 ? No, but you can say RHEL4 was based on FC3. RHEL5 will be based on FC6. But you can't really say they are the same thing at all. Is there any ideas on when RHEL5 will be out? P.D.: FC3 has packa

Re: Mailman vulnerability

On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, David Eisenstein wrote: Thanks a bunch, Martin! :) Info on your source package has been placed into Bugzilla #209891 , and hopefully we'll soon have this QA'ed and published in the Legacy repositories! We still need work on the FC3 version of t

Re: Mailman vulnerability

On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:50:46 -0600, David Eisenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We still need work on the FC3 version of this package: >mailman-2.1.5-32.fc3.src.rpm > in Bugzilla #211676. This should be easier, as the patches I used from RHEL (attached in this mail) were for mailmail 2.1

Re: Mailman vulnerability

On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Jesse Keating wrote: On Wednesday 08 November 2006 06:45, Martin Marques wrote: Would you people like to see the patches first or do I send the src.rpm? Either way. We now manage FC-4 in CVS so adding just a patch to generate a updates-testing rpm is easy enough. OK. I

Re: Mailman vulnerability

On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Jesse Keating wrote: On Wednesday 08 November 2006 06:45, Martin Marques wrote: Would you people like to see the patches first or do I send the src.rpm? Either way. We now manage FC-4 in CVS so adding just a patch to generate a updates-testing rpm is easy enough

Re: Mailman vulnerability

On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Michal Jaegermann wrote: On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:19:48AM -0300, Martin Marques wrote: I have a FC4 web server installed and got this mailman report: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19831/discuss Is it to worry? Probably. See also http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA

Re: Mailman vulnerability

On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Michal Jaegermann wrote: On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:19:48AM -0300, Martin Marques wrote: I have a FC4 web server installed and got this mailman report: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19831/discuss Is it to worry? Probably. See also http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA

Mailman vulnerability

I have a FC4 web server installed and got this mailman report: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19831/discuss Is it to worry? I am thinking about promoting it to FC5 but as it is a server in production I want to make a very good plan first. -- 21:50:04 up 2 days, 9:07, 0 users, load aver