Hat doesnt actually determine the release cycle or lifespan for
that. The release features as well as resources available is the
criteria for that. Fedora release cycle is around every 6 months and the
lifespan for each release is around 13 months now.
Rahul
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-l
from Red Hat. Asking for more would require a good business case for it.
I doubt you can find one easily.
Rahul
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
to
do (which is for around 13 months), people who are expecting a longer
lifecyle should contribute towards that and find the middle ground they
need to.
Rahul
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
positories. When Fedora Core
adopted the extras packaging guidelines a number of packages didnt have
a proper upgrade path and I had to do some post upgrade manual clean up.
It isnt yet good enough for me to recommend to new users.
Rahul
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@
correct link.
http://download.fedoralegacy.org/fedora/4/updates/i386/yum-2.4.1-1.fc4.noarch.rpm
Thanks. Fixed.
Rahul
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
Axel Thimm wrote:
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 11:46:37PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Unifying and opening up more of the infrastructure and other ideas like
that only doing critical security fixes are things to look at.
But FL's charter is already to only cater about security fixes, or d
pared to active upstream or new
release development.
Unifying and opening up more of the infrastructure and other ideas like
that only doing critical security fixes are things to look at.
Rahul
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
just have to enable it.
Rahul
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
Guolin Cheng wrote:
Rahul,
DO you know when is the estimated EOL data for FC3/FC4? Thanks.
--Guolin
Thats answered in the FAQ. See the 1-2-3 and out policy.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legacy/FAQ
Rahul
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https
ll be stopped.
Rahul
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
Marc Deslauriers wrote:
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 03:42 +0530, Rahul wrote:
In general, IMO, Fedora Legacy errata policy should be to bump up to
the newer upstream version on ancillary packages and backport fixes to
only libraries or software that have other visible major dependencies
and
interfaces which are known to be used by third
parties. If there isnt any opposition to this, I will add this piece of
info to the wiki pages and FAQ on legacy.
Rahul
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
whatever system used by the Fedora Security Team
should be adopted by Fedora Legacy after discussion with the relevant
contributors.
Rahul
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
efore 1.5 and
> 1.0.x before 1.0.8, Mozilla Suite before 1.7.13, and SeaMonkey before 1.0,
> according to CVE-2006-0749.
>
> Be careful out there! We'll get these out for Legacy as soon as we can.
Updates have been announced for Fedora Core 4 and Fedora Core 5. It
should be easy
edora Core 4 and I dont see a single
reason why Fedora Legacy is different. Flip a bit in an existing file
if you *dont* want it and Pirut might add a graphical interface to do
that even.
--
Rahul
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/ma
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
The way I see it, Fedora Extras and Core already have access to PPC
systems and Legacy is meanwhile waiting for hardware donations. If we
share the infrastructure and we are well integrated, that shouldnt be
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:26 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Thats strange. How does RHL content affect the ability of Fedora Legacy
to use Fedora Extras buildsystems?. I didnt see any public discussion
happening on this and we definitely need the details spelled out more
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:06 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
So perhaps an obvious question is could Red Hat internal build systems
used by Fedora Core or the ones used for Fedora Extras be spared a few
cycles for Fedora legacy on x86_64/PPC or do you want to keep the
to the project we need to list what
exactly is required for them to participate. While the QA procedures for
example are documented, the requirement for a PPC system is not. The
website needs a highlighted list of such documentation.
--
Rahul
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-leg
uture.
For those who hate the wiki with a passion, we will have a CMS system
soon in fedoraproject.org. Plone+Zope and a few other custom utilities
and scripts.
--
Rahul
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
Mike McCarty wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
This is not a discussion about personal opinions on QA policies within
I haven't presumed to dictate the content of your messages, or state
what your intended topic was. Please grant me the same privilege.
Or are you acting as a moderator?
. The time spend in discussions on the list could be directed towards
actual work.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
Mike McCarty wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
Yes, my indictment earlier was for *all* distributions of Linux.
But Legacy has gone further than I can follow along, that's all.
We are merely discussing a proposal so legacy process hasnt gone further
That is not my understanding
know?. If they are better are you willing to get involved in
QA with the legacy project to help it be better?. Thats what we need.
More contributors working on it. Other discussions is just fluff.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
fedora-legacy
e."
I would like to see what the formal policies within these projects are
for doing QA is.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
;We know that, at the moment, there is no
real quality assurance for Debian, in a conventional meaning of that
term". Feel free to look for better QA processes than Fedora legacy
within the community distributions and suggest ideas.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject
"unless we get a lot of objection" so
please, if you object, let it be known.
I did object, and then I saw that the decision was *made*.
A decision hasnt been made. Even if one has been made it can be reverted.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZapp
urage me from using
the repository.
Hopefully see the need for contributors to do the actual work involved
including QA and look into that instead of moving away from the project.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
f
ary QA votes get published
before the timeout hits, the package will be released sooner.
Then the Legacy Project has removed my ability not to subscribe
to "testing".
Seems to be a misunderstanding here. There are separate repositories for
testing and general legacy updates. Yes
James Kosin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
It is referred from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legacy which has a
link from the frontpage. How is that buried in clutter?. What can we do
to improve that?\
Don't get personal, I'
nite amount
of time awaiting feedback.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
James Kosin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legacy/QATesting.
OK,
It is a little buried in the clutter. I've seen this page many times,
but never really dig-ed into it.
It is referred from
document on the whole
process for everyone to review and agree upon... unless something like
this already exists... which I've never seen.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legacy/QATesting.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing
there are some
potential changes like the CLA which might be projected for everyone's
benefit and for the management to be streamlined across various Fedora
Projects.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
Ps: It would be helpful if people can ask ques
as also been copied over into the wiki
in anticipation of the depreciation of http://fedoralegacy.org in favor
of adding information to the primary Fedora Project website at
http://fedoraproject.org. Comments and feedback is most welcome.
Rahul, you removed text mentioning what distributions o
m/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-January/msg00744.html
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
feedback is most welcome.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
Hi
Hi Rahul, I just browsed through some fedora-devel-list posts from
this month, so far all I see is two people in a thread: "RFE: Retire
Fedora Core 4 only _after_ FC6 has been released." who mention that
they think "legacy" has negative connotation(s). Are the
would bother reading about it.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
39 matches
Mail list logo
