-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benjamin Smith wrote:
| It's easy to set up a yum server. I've posted instructions for
| hosting WBEL4 packages on a WBEL3 server
| http://effortlessis.com/wbel4yum.html
|
| Why not set up a yum repo on your RPM repository, and post
| announcements h
It's easy to set up a yum server. I've posted instructions for hosting WBEL4
packages on a WBEL3 server http://effortlessis.com/wbel4yum.html
Why not set up a yum repo on your RPM repository, and post announcements here,
in a format easily recognized as such?
Setup will take you an hour or so
> |
> |Perhaps what I'm missing is how this is adding value to
> |Fedora-legacy?
> |
> |
> |Regards, Mike Klinke
>
> I don't want to add confusion, just a place to add updates for new
> versions of products.
> I'll refrane from posting until I straighten this mess out.
>
> James Kosin
>
Hi Jame
On 2005-08-08 10:47:51 -0500, Mike Klinke wrote:
> On Monday 08 August 2005 10:40, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > So fedora legacy includes a patched version of zlib 1.2.0.7, and
> > James offers a package for zlib 1.2.3. Where's the problem?
>
>
> And all this doesn't seem confusing? 8)
The only th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Klinke wrote:
|On Monday 08 August 2005 10:55, JK wrote:
|
|
|><<-- SNIP -->>
|
|
|
|Well, maybe it's just me, but I find that a security fix released
|against a fedora-legacy supported version ( FC1 ) to fix a version
|of a package that was nev
It's hardly going to be confusing as fedora legacy are not interested in
updating packages to enable 3rd party apps like clamav to work. I'm not
knocking Fedora Legacy, but it's nice to think that someones working on the
problem. Nigel
On Monday 08 Aug 2005 4:23 pm, Mike Klinke wrote:
> On
On Monday 08 August 2005 10:55, JK wrote:
>
> Yes, and No at the same time.
> These are repackaged versions of the ZLib package.
> The version of ZLib for FC1 you have is correct... although, I
> believe I've only seen one security fix in the current one.
> The BUG fixes are nice; but, not a requ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Klinke wrote:
| On Monday 08 August 2005 09:21, James Kosin wrote:
|
|> JAMES' Unofficial Unsupported by RedHat, Redhat Fedora Core, and
|> Redhat Fedora Legacy Groups! ~Any support for my packages,
|> will only come from me! There is no
On Monday 08 August 2005 10:40, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
>
> Nice disclaimer. Unfortunately people don't seem to read it.
Exactly ..
>
> Fedora Legacy has a different policy for security fixes: Patches
> are generally backported to the released version, upgrades to the
> newest version are avoi
On 2005-08-08 10:23:03 -0500, Mike Klinke wrote:
> On Monday 08 August 2005 09:21, James Kosin wrote:
> > JAMES' Unofficial Unsupported by RedHat, Redhat Fedora Core, and
> > Redhat Fedora Legacy Groups!
> > ~Any support for my packages, will only come from me! There
> > is no bugzilla for th
On Monday 08 August 2005 09:21, James Kosin wrote:
> JAMES' Unofficial Unsupported by RedHat, Redhat Fedora Core, and
> Redhat Fedora Legacy Groups!
> ~Any support for my packages, will only come from me! There
> is no bugzilla for the packages, groups may not know what version
> you are tal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
JAMES' Unofficial Unsupported by RedHat, Redhat Fedora Core, and
Redhat Fedora Legacy Groups!
~Any support for my packages, will only come from me! There is no
bugzilla for the packages, groups may not know what version you are
talking about. T
12 matches
Mail list logo
