On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 12:50 -0400, Adam Gibson wrote:
> One thing I noticed after the latest yum update of sendmail from the
> previous update is that alternatives is broken for /etc/pam.d/smtp for
> the sendmail package. Sendmail used to create /etc/pam.d/smtp.sendmail
> which alternatives wou
David Eisenstein wrote:
Adam Gibson wrote:
Adam Gibson wrote:
One thing I noticed after the latest yum update of sendmail from the
previous update is that alternatives is broken for /etc/pam.d/smtp for
the sendmail package. <>
So basically it boils down to alternatives with the newer sendmai
Adam Gibson wrote:
> Adam Gibson wrote:
>
>> One thing I noticed after the latest yum update of sendmail from the
>> previous update is that alternatives is broken for /etc/pam.d/smtp for
>> the sendmail package. <>
> So basically it boils down to alternatives with the newer sendmail
> updates do
Adam Gibson wrote:
One thing I noticed after the latest yum update of sendmail from the
previous update is that alternatives is broken for /etc/pam.d/smtp for
the sendmail package. Sendmail used to create /etc/pam.d/smtp.sendmail
which alternatives would create a symlink at /etc/pam.d/smtp to
One thing I noticed after the latest yum update of sendmail from the
previous update is that alternatives is broken for /etc/pam.d/smtp for
the sendmail package. Sendmail used to create /etc/pam.d/smtp.sendmail
which alternatives would create a symlink at /etc/pam.d/smtp to
eventually point to
-
Fedora Legacy Update Advisory
Synopsis: Updated sendmail packages fix security issue
Advisory ID: FLSA:186277
Issue date:2006-04-04
Product: Red Hat Linux, Fedora Core
Keywords:
