On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, David Eisenstein wrote:
Thanks a bunch, Martin! :) Info on your source package has been placed
into Bugzilla #209891 http://tinyurl.com/yje83r, and hopefully we'll soon
have this QA'ed and published in the Legacy repositories!
We still need work on the FC3 version of
On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:50:46 -0600, David Eisenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We still need work on the FC3 version of this package:
mailman-2.1.5-32.fc3.src.rpm
in Bugzilla #211676.
This should be easier, as the patches I used from RHEL (attached in this mail)
were for mailmail 2.1.5.
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 06:45, Martin Marques wrote:
Would you people like to see the patches first or do I send the src.rpm?
Either way. We now manage FC-4 in CVS so adding just a patch to generate a
updates-testing rpm is easy enough.
OK. I
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:19:48AM -0300, Martin Marques wrote:
I have a FC4 web server installed and got this mailman report:
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19831/discuss
Is it to worry?
Probably. See also
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 06:45, Martin Marques wrote:
Would you people like to see the patches first or do I send the src.rpm?
Either way. We now manage FC-4 in CVS so adding just a patch to generate a
updates-testing rpm is easy enough.
- Original Message -
From: Martin Marques martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar
To: fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 7:19 AM
Subject: Mailman vulnerability
I have a FC4 web server installed and got this mailman report:
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19831/discuss
- Original Message -
From: Martin Marques martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar
To: Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: Mailman vulnerability
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006
I have a FC4 web server installed and got this mailman report:
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19831/discuss
Is it to worry?
I am thinking about promoting it to FC5 but as it is a server in
production I want to make a very good plan first.
--
21:50:04 up 2 days, 9:07, 0 users, load
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:19:48AM -0300, Martin Marques wrote:
I have a FC4 web server installed and got this mailman report:
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19831/discuss
Is it to worry?
Probably. See also http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0600.html
FC4 is using mailman-2.1.5-35
