Marc Deslauriers wrote:
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 03:42 +0530, Rahul wrote:
In general, IMO, Fedora Legacy errata policy should be to bump up to
the newer upstream version on ancillary packages and backport fixes to
only libraries or software that have other visible major dependencies
and externa
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 03:42 +0530, Rahul wrote:
> In general, IMO, Fedora Legacy errata policy should be to bump up to
> the newer upstream version on ancillary packages and backport fixes to
> only libraries or software that have other visible major dependencies
> and externally defined interf
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I think it might be a good idea to evaluate a change of
Firefox/Thunderbird/Mozilla to the latest tree set. This would mean
changing Mozilla to Seamonkey, and moving Firefox/Thunderbird to 1.5.x
series.
I know this is a big change, but is the time to backport fixes wo
On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 15:11 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> I think it might be a good idea to evaluate a change of
> Firefox/Thunderbird/Mozilla to the latest tree set. This would mean
> changing Mozilla to Seamonkey, and moving Firefox/Thunderbird to 1.5.x
> series.
>
> I know this is a big
I think it might be a good idea to evaluate a change of
Firefox/Thunderbird/Mozilla to the latest tree set. This would mean
changing Mozilla to Seamonkey, and moving Firefox/Thunderbird to 1.5.x
series.
I know this is a big change, but is the time to backport fixes worth
the headache in time of b
