Quoting Jancio Wodnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
When i remember, there was an update of sendmail in march, wait, i will
grep that for you:
25 of march my system was update with sendmail-8.12.11-4.22.9.legacy
and then was problem with AUTH - mail from local lan were rejected, so
i greep mailing list,
Eric Rostetter napisał(a):
Quoting Jancio Wodnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I have got latest sendmail's update on my rh73 and rh9 boxes.
Issues are still the same: after update there is lack of those files:
After update from which version? Were any manual changes made those files
on the machine b
Eric Rostetter napisał(a):
Quoting Jancio Wodnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I have got latest sendmail's update on my rh73 and rh9 boxes.
Issues are still the same: after update there is lack of those files:
After update from which version? Were any manual changes made those files
on the machine b
Quoting Jancio Wodnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I have got latest sendmail's update on my rh73 and rh9 boxes.
Issues are still the same: after update there is lack of those files:
After update from which version? Were any manual changes made those files
on the machine before the latest install? D
I can confirm most of this info on my RH 9 and 7.3 systems as well. For me, it
was just user auth that appeared to be broken by this last package. The secure
cert setup that was part of the last bad-package-fix-effort didn't show any
direct errors, relaying from localhost worked fine, receivi
i was going to ask the same question... sort of.
i installed the first sendmail fix (22.9) on a redhat 7.3 system last week
without noticing any problems since.
would you guys still advice me to also update to the newly updated sendmail
packages(22.10) or would it be wiser not fix something tha
Eric Rostetter napisał(a):
Quoting Jancio Wodnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi. but above statement is not true. There are still problem with
alternatives on rh7.3 and rh9 when updated to latest sendmail update.
Lates update didn't fix that. Sorry, but there is still some work to do.
Regrads,
Iren
Quoting Jancio Wodnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi. but above statement is not true. There are still problem with
alternatives on rh7.3 and rh9 when updated to latest sendmail update.
Lates update didn't fix that. Sorry, but there is still some work to do.
Regrads,
Irens.
Then you best report wh
Kelson napisał(a):
Kurt Bechstein wrote:
I have a question on the recent sendmail updates. I'm referencing two
urls here and they are:
http://fedoranews.org/cms/node/489
http://fedoranews.org/cms/node/581
They both appear to refer to the same sendmail bug so I'm just curious
if the initial pack
Kurt Bechstein wrote:
I have a question on the recent sendmail updates. I'm referencing two
urls here and they are:
http://fedoranews.org/cms/node/489
http://fedoranews.org/cms/node/581
They both appear to refer to the same sendmail bug so I'm just curious
if the initial packages didn't fully f
10 matches
Mail list logo
