On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 01:58 -0600, Eric Rostetter wrote:
In any case, I think we should _at least_ release all FC3 packages
for x86_64. In other words, we shouldn't release new FC3 x86_64
without releasing also the older FC3 x86_64, for consistency.
So far, all FC3 updates have had x86_64
So with the new build software that we're having good success with we
can produce x86_64 packages (and with future hardware donations ppc
packages too). We've been spinning all FC3 updates with x86_64
packages, but the question remains, do we want to rebuild all previously
released errata for
Jesse Keating wrote:
So with the new build software that we're having good success with we
can produce x86_64 packages (and with future hardware donations ppc
packages too). We've been spinning all FC3 updates with x86_64
packages, but the question remains, do we want to rebuild all previously
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:06 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
So perhaps an obvious question is could Red Hat internal build systems
used by Fedora Core or the ones used for Fedora Extras be spared a few
cycles for Fedora legacy on x86_64/PPC or do you want to keep the
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:26 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Thats strange. How does RHL content affect the ability of Fedora Legacy
to use Fedora Extras buildsystems?. I didnt see any public discussion
happening on this and we definitely need the details spelled out more
precisely.
Again, I'm
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:26 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Thats strange. How does RHL content affect the ability of Fedora Legacy
to use Fedora Extras buildsystems?. I didnt see any public discussion
happening on this and we definitely need the details spelled out more
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
The way I see it, Fedora Extras and Core already have access to PPC
systems and Legacy is meanwhile waiting for hardware donations. If we
share the infrastructure and we are well integrated, that shouldnt be
happening. This is not
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jesse Keating
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 10:21 PM
To: fedora-legacy-list@redhat.com
Subject: Rebuild exisitng errata for x86_64?
So I guess the bottom line question is, is there a
significant
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
The way I see it, Fedora Extras and Core already have access to PPC
systems and Legacy is meanwhile waiting for hardware donations. If we
share the infrastructure and we are well integrated, that shouldnt be
Quoting Jesse Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
packages, but the question remains, do we want to rebuild all previously
released errata for x86_64, for releases that have x86_64 (FC1,2,3).
Yes, if possible, but this is something to be done in the background,
at lower priority, as time permits.
In
10 matches
Mail list logo