Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thursday 30 November 2006 10:32, Matthew Miller wrote:
Everyone's pretty much talking like this is a done deal. Any idea when an
official decision will be made?
I'm involved in discussions with RH management this week, and probably next
week.
Any chance that
On Friday 01 December 2006 18:58, David D. Eisenstein wrote:
I'm involved in discussions with RH management this week, and probably
next week.
Any chance that others involved with Fedora Legacy in addition to you
might be able to be involved in those discussions, Jesse?
Unfortunately it is
On Thursday 30 November 2006 06:55, Matthew Miller wrote:
Is the 13-month lifespan for Core (i.e. merged Legacy) accepted as
official?
That honestly depends on if releasing core to the outside world gets the
approval of Red Hat management. We hope it does, and if it does (and if
Legacy and
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:12:53AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thursday 30 November 2006 06:55, Matthew Miller wrote:
Is the 13-month lifespan for Core (i.e. merged Legacy) accepted as
official?
That honestly depends on if releasing core to the outside world gets the
approval of Red
Axel Thimm wrote:
If some statement from legacy is needed about FC3/FC4 before that
decision is made (which IMHO is needed), how about something along a
heading of
Fedora Legacy is ending its current support model working towards
direct involvement in maintenance of upcoming Fedora
Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
Unfortunately I will have to be migrating our last Fedora servers
over to CentOS even sooner now...
I take it, then, that extending Fedora's (supported) life-cycle to 13+ mos
isn't sufficient for your needs?
-- Rex
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
On Thursday 30 November 2006 14:59, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
I think it's sad Fedora Legacy seems to be ending a little
prematurely, but I totally understand that the people that were
carrying this dying beast have decided to just put it down and let it
be. Unfortunately I will have to
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 09:11:52AM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
Unfortunately I will have to be migrating our last Fedora servers
over to CentOS even sooner now...
I take it, then, that extending Fedora's (supported) life-cycle to 13+ mos
isn't sufficient for your needs?
That's the case here
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:12:53AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
That honestly depends on if releasing core to the outside world gets the
approval of Red Hat management. We hope it does, and if it does (and if
Legacy and FESCO agrees) than the 13month will fall into effect. So it
hasn't
On Thursday 30 November 2006 10:32, Matthew Miller wrote:
Everyone's pretty much talking like this is a done deal. Any idea when an
official decision will be made?
I'm involved in discussions with RH management this week, and probably next
week.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 10:35:44AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
Everyone's pretty much talking like this is a done deal. Any idea when an
official decision will be made?
I'm involved in discussions with RH management this week, and probably next
week.
Okay, thanks for the update.
--
Rex Dieter wrote:
Unfortunately I will have to be migrating our last Fedora servers
over to CentOS even sooner now...
I take it, then, that extending Fedora's (supported) life-cycle to
13+ mos
isn't sufficient for your needs?
Not for that couple of FC3 machines my clients have running.
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 04:40:55PM +0100, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
Not for that couple of FC3 machines my clients have running. Or am I
misunderstanding the 13 months of support somehow? FC3 was released
on November 8 2004. Also, FC4 (I don't have any FC4 machines) was
released on
Op 30-nov-2006, om 17:11 heeft Matthew Miller het volgende geschreven:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 04:40:55PM +0100, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)
wrote:
Not for that couple of FC3 machines my clients have running. Or am I
misunderstanding the 13 months of support somehow? FC3 was released
on
On 11/30/06, Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
Unfortunately I will have to be migrating our last Fedora servers
over to CentOS even sooner now...
I take it, then, that extending Fedora's (supported) life-cycle to 13+ mos
isn't sufficient for your needs?
Benjamin Smith wrote:
On Saturday 18 November 2006 01:20, Florian La Roche wrote:
Interest in Fedora Legacy has slowed down. You can find some
FC4 updates at http://www.jur-linux.org/rpms/fc-updates/4/ ,
but some updates will probably also soon show up at
http://fedoralegacy.org/
I can see
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 01:26:12PM -0600, David Eisenstein wrote:
I wish I could do more. But really, I don't know that that wish is
realistic. Does anyone else wish more could be done? Or do we just kill the
project?
Well, as I've said, I wish more could be done, but I can't really do it.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Discussion of the Fedora Legacy Project
Subject: nails in coffins? Re: Openssl updates
Benjamin Smith wrote:
On Saturday 18 November 2006 01:20, Florian La Roche wrote:
Interest in Fedora Legacy has slowed down. You can find some
FC4 updates at http://www.jur-linux.org/rpms/fc
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 02:29:28PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 01:26:12PM -0600, David Eisenstein wrote:
I wish I could do more. But really, I don't know that that wish is
realistic. Does anyone else wish more could be done? Or do we just kill
the
project?
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 03:33:59AM +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
I would rephrase it in a positive way: Legacy is merged with Core and
Extras under one umbrella redefining EOL time marks. E.g. there is a
shorter total lifespan, but during that lifespan there is more
manpower assigned to get timely
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 21:58, Matthew Miller wrote:
Okay, what more do we need to make it official?
Webpage changes to note our wrapup, reporting to the Fedora Board regarding
our project status, postings to fedora-announce-list, and then watching the
flames roll in.
--
Jesse Keating
21 matches
Mail list logo
