Hi,
I am preparing a package (Atari++, http://www.math.tu-berlin.de/%
7Ethor/atari++/) that is using a clone of the MPLv1.1. What License: tag
should I use? All files related to licensing are attached, source files
contain a header like in adrspace.cpp.
Thanks,
Da
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 17:58 +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> I am preparing a package (Atari++, http://www.math.tu-berlin.de/%
> 7Ethor/atari++/) that is using a clone of the MPLv1.1. What License:
> tag
> should I use? All files related to licensing are attached, source
> files
> contain a header like in
This package brings up a couple of other issues.
Firstly, it's an emulator, but it doesn't seem to need any original
ROMs to run because they're written their own work-alikes. I'm
assuming this is OK, but I guess it's worth asking.
Secondly, those work-alike ROMs are included in pre-assembled fo
Jason L Tibbitts III píše v St 19. 11. 2008 v 12:36 -0600:
> This package brings up a couple of other issues.
>
> Firstly, it's an emulator, but it doesn't seem to need any original
> ROMs to run because they're written their own work-alikes. I'm
> assuming this is OK, but I guess it's worth ask
Hi,
can someone check the cc65 cross-compiler environment license at
http://www.cc65.org/#Copyright ? The second part related to libs and
utils is "zlib/libpng license", but I cannot decode the first part.
Thanks,
Dan
___
Fedo
> "DH" == Dan Horák <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DH> Hi, can someone check the cc65 cross-compiler environment license
DH> at http://www.cc65.org/#Copyright ?
"
Anyone may copy or redistribute these programs, provided that:
1: You don't charge anything for the copy. It is permissable (sic
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 14:51 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> "
> Anyone may copy or redistribute these programs, provided that:
>
> 1: You don't charge anything for the copy. It is permissable (sic)
> to
> charge a nominal fee for media, etc.
> "
>
> seems to be non-free to me. I'v
