On 07/08/2009 03:43 AM, Luis Villa wrote:
>
> Sure, though of course we know they've gone around suing using
> companies before, so if I were a company-based contributor to Fedora
> (or a mirror) I'd be a bit twitchy.
Then, it would be up to the company to consider joining OIN. You don't
have to
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 07/07/2009 05:52 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
>> So what coverage/license/protection do I, as a Fedora contributor but
>> not a RH employee, get?
>
> You, individually? Probably none,
Just checking. ;)
> although the likelyhood of Microsoft
On 07/07/2009 05:52 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
> So what coverage/license/protection do I, as a Fedora contributor but
> not a RH employee, get?
You, individually? Probably none, although the likelyhood of Microsoft
suing you, individually is very very very very very very low, since you
are giving cont
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 07/07/2009 03:44 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Tom "spot" Callaway
>>> wrote:
On 07/07/2009 08:32 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> Just to make sur
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 07/07/2009 03:39 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
>> OIN is 'if they shoot first, we'll take them down with us, so they
>> probably won't shoot first.' MCP at least purports to be an
>> enforceable 'we won't shoot' promise. The second is certainl
On 07/07/2009 03:44 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Tom "spot" Callaway
>> wrote:
>>> On 07/07/2009 08:32 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Just to make sure it's seen by the legal-minded, fwiw:
http://port25.technet.
On 07/07/2009 03:39 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
> OIN is 'if they shoot first, we'll take them down with us, so they
> probably won't shoot first.' MCP at least purports to be an
> enforceable 'we won't shoot' promise. The second is certainly a better
> and substantially different situation to be in, if
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Luis Villa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Tom "spot" Callaway
> wrote:
>> On 07/07/2009 08:32 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>>> Just to make sure it's seen by the legal-minded, fwiw:
>>> http://port25.technet.com/archive/2009/07/06/the-ecma-c-and-cli-standar
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 07/07/2009 08:32 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>> Just to make sure it's seen by the legal-minded, fwiw:
>> http://port25.technet.com/archive/2009/07/06/the-ecma-c-and-cli-standards.aspx
>>
>> Doesn't have anything to do with our recent
On 07/07/2009 08:32 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> Just to make sure it's seen by the legal-minded, fwiw:
> http://port25.technet.com/archive/2009/07/06/the-ecma-c-and-cli-standards.aspx
>
> Doesn't have anything to do with our recent move of Tomboy -> Gnote
> for the Live CD, but worth noting for o
Just to make sure it's seen by the legal-minded, fwiw:
http://port25.technet.com/archive/2009/07/06/the-ecma-c-and-cli-standards.aspx
Doesn't have anything to do with our recent move of Tomboy -> Gnote
for the Live CD, but worth noting for overall packaging and
background.
--
Paul W. Frields
11 matches
Mail list logo
