On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:19:51 +0200, Nifty Fedora Mitch
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:30:14AM +0200, roland wrote:
I am using a terminalemulator Anita to login to a server, who validates
the ssh connection with 3DES Cipher.
Now this server is hacked, somebody entered
Hi,
Also, many thanks for the feedback!
In fact, I've done that before also without success...
I've tried again, and I have the following selected in Edit-->Preferences:
-Master
-PCM
-Line-In
-Line-In capture
-CD
-CD capture
-Microphone
-Microphone capture
-Mic Boost (+20db)
-Mic select
-PC speaker
Kevin Martin wrote:
| sh-3.2$ /bin/ksh -c " set -xv ; grep ABCD b ; echo $? ; if [ "$?" =
| "0" ] ; then echo yes ; fi"
What I've been seeing is if I try to pass the
"/bin/ksh -c "if"" script the $? of the grep never seems to be 0 for
some reason so I essentially get the results that I
Stewart Williams wrote:
I think I know the answer to this, but I'm just clarifying.
I have updated to the updates-newkey repo for updates, but there are
packages that I want to install, and these are still pulled from the
fedora (Everything) repo.
Is it safe to use the repo yet or are all th
Hi Tim;
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 13:05 +0930, Tim wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 12:30 -0400, William Case wrote:
> > When I originally installed the new "*.26.3* kernel. the oldest kernel
> > was not removed as usual. (Perhaps the full installation was not
> > completed??)
>
> How many kernels do
--- On Tue, 9/16/08, Rahul Sundaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Rahul Sundaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: yum upgrade F8->F9
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for
> using Fedora."
> Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2008, 7:14 PM
> Globe Trott
Robin Laing wrote
Jim wrote:
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Jim wrote:
FC8
Does Thunderbird crash when you have to many emails in Inbox ??
I have a friend that has had thunderbird crash three times in one year
he says he has 600 emails in Inbox, and I check to see how many
emails are in his in
I still can't find anything on this. I've tried using setarch to
change the reported architecture to ppc, but it says that it's
unrecognized. Can anybody give me a lead? Thanks.
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Jameson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to use mock to test building packa
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 12:30 -0400, William Case wrote:
> When I originally installed the new "*.26.3* kernel. the oldest kernel
> was not removed as usual. (Perhaps the full installation was not
> completed??)
How many kernels do you have installed? rpm -q kernel
You normally should have more
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 10:11 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> how can you tell when the thread ends
When there are no more messages tied to it... Mail clients that thread
messages will, somewhere in the list of messages (perhaps before the
subject line, perhaps just leftmost of the message listing),
Patrick O'Callaghan writes:
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 22:05 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Rahul Sundaram writes:
> Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
>> However, nothing stops you from installing 32 bit Firefox, which will
>> run just fine on a 64 bit Fedora install.
>
> You don't have to do that. Fedora
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 22:05 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram writes:
>
> > Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> >
> >> However, nothing stops you from installing 32 bit Firefox, which will
> >> run just fine on a 64 bit Fedora install.
> >
> > You don't have to do that. Fedora by default inst
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 05:50:18PM -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> Dave Feustel wrote:
> [snip]
>>> 1. Machines do not have X installed and boot to run level 3
I did not write the above point 1.
I did write the following:
>> Having spent some time running X on OpenBSD, FreeBSD, Fedora, and now SUSE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram writes:
>
>> Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>>
>>> However, nothing stops you from installing 32 bit Firefox, which will
>>> run just fine on a 64 bit Fedora install.
>>
>> You don't have to do that. Fedora by default i
I have some php classes I use for accessing mySQL databases on localhost.
Somewhere in there, I have the mySQL userid/password so the php script can
access the data.
What is the normal practice for concealing that type of information? Keeping
classes in /usr/share/php seems to imply they need to b
Rahul Sundaram writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
However, nothing stops you from installing 32 bit Firefox, which will
run just fine on a 64 bit Fedora install.
You don't have to do that. Fedora by default installs nspluginwrapper
which works with the 32-bit plugins on 64-bit arch. It also has
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
However, nothing stops you from installing 32 bit Firefox, which will
run just fine on a 64 bit Fedora install.
You don't have to do that. Fedora by default installs nspluginwrapper
which works with the 32-bit plugins on 64-bit arch. It also has the
advantage of adding
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 09:41:28 pm Kevin Martin wrote:
> Have you checked the website
> http://lifehacker.com/software/note-taking/note-taking-roundup-230867.php
> ?
I don't see any reference there to any Linux outliner.
I did my google search before posting on the list and couldn't find a
Hi,
After i have downloaded Fedora Desktop Live Media x86_64 Live Cd, I tried to
boot iso_linux within poweriso but it says invalid public key security object
file: this file (boot.cat) is invalid for the use of the following: Security
Catalogue. How do I resolve this?
_
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Henning Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 21:29 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > Henning Larsen writes:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I have 32 and 64bit pc's with f9, I believe 32bit is less troublesome,
> > > Is there any big loss in speed run
Henning Larsen writes:
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 21:29 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Henning Larsen writes:
> Hi
>
> I have 32 and 64bit pc's with f9, I believe 32bit is less troublesome,
> Is there any big loss in speed running 32bit f9 on 64bit cpu?
There's some speed penalty. Native 64 bit a
Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've been using Tuxcards for a couple of years as my main outliner (before
> that I used Knowit). The problem is... both projects are no longer
> maintained (more than 2 years ago).
>
> Does anyone knows any good two-pane outliner - similar to the a
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 21:29 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Henning Larsen writes:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I have 32 and 64bit pc's with f9, I believe 32bit is less troublesome,
> > Is there any big loss in speed running 32bit f9 on 64bit cpu?
>
> There's some speed penalty. Native 64 bit application b
Henning Larsen writes:
Hi
I have 32 and 64bit pc's with f9, I believe 32bit is less troublesome,
Is there any big loss in speed running 32bit f9 on 64bit cpu?
There's some speed penalty. Native 64 bit application benefit from having
more 64 bit registers on the CPU.
Is 32bit more stable t
Hi
I have 32 and 64bit pc's with f9, I believe 32bit is less troublesome,
Is there any big loss in speed running 32bit f9 on 64bit cpu?
Is 32bit more stable than 64bit?
Henning Larsen
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedo
Dave Feustel wrote:
[snip]
1. Machines do not have X installed and boot to run level 3
Having spent some time running X on OpenBSD, FreeBSD, Fedora, and now SUSE 11,
I am convinced that using X on any of these platforms enables exploits that
cannot be disabled. You cannot have both security an
Hello everyone,
I've been using Tuxcards for a couple of years as my main outliner (before
that I used Knowit). The problem is... both projects are no longer
maintained (more than 2 years ago).
Does anyone knows any good two-pane outliner - similar to the above ones -
that is alive?
Thanks!
Globe Trotter wrote:
I was wondering if anyone had experience with upgrading F8 to F9 of late. I get
a strange bunch of dependencies which indicate that the current rpms (to be
upgraded) have dependencies on the old (F8) ones. For example, claws-mail in F8
needs libssl.so.6, etc.
But why shou
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 September 2008, Joel Rees wrote:
>>On Sep 16, 2008, at 4:44 PM, Andrea Mastellone wrote:
>>> Mike wrote:
It seems that the directory:
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/8/
I was wondering if anyone had experience with upgrading F8 to F9 of late. I get
a strange bunch of dependencies which indicate that the current rpms (to be
upgraded) have dependencies on the old (F8) ones. For example, claws-mail in F8
needs libssl.so.6, etc.
But why should yum care? Claws-mail
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 15:27 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 11:01 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 10:11 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > > How in evolution to you tell the program to thread by In-Reply-To
> > > header and not by subject?
> >
> > Evo *
On Tuesday 16 September 2008, Joel Rees wrote:
>On Sep 16, 2008, at 4:44 PM, Andrea Mastellone wrote:
>> Mike wrote:
>>> It seems that the directory:
>>> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/8/
>>> i386.newkey
>>> has disappeared from the main download server so yum update is
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 23:17:13 +0200, Boris Glawe wrote:
>
>
>>> Is there anything of interest in the mysqld.log file?
>>>
>>> Kevin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> This could be interesting, though I don't know how to interprete these
>> messages
>>
>> 080916 21:28:02 [W
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 23:17:13 +0200, Boris Glawe wrote:
>
> > Is there anything of interest in the mysqld.log file?
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> >
>
> This could be interesting, though I don't know how to interprete these
> messages
>
> 080916 21:28:02 [Warning] Aborted connection 2 to db: 'uncon
Is there anything of interest in the mysqld.log file?
Kevin
This could be interesting, though I don't know how to interprete these
messages
080916 21:28:02 [Warning] Aborted connection 2 to db: 'unconnected'
user: 'UNKNOWN_MYSQL_US' host: 'localhost' (init_connect command failed)
2008/9/16 Antonio M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/9/16 Antonio M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Some points:
>>
>> I have installed Audacity...so I imported an mp3 file and I tried to play.
>> I get the message
>> Error during audio device opening.Please check playback device options
>> and sampling frequen
for your network/situation,
provide us the information/diagram for how you're getting to the net.
machine1(ipaddress,os,mask,default gateway,etc...)
^
|
|
V
switch/router (ipaddress,os,mask,etc...)
^
|
|
V
cable/dsl (ipaddress,os,mask,etc...)
^
|
|
V
Inte
I think I know the answer to this, but I'm just clarifying.
I have updated to the updates-newkey repo for updates, but there are
packages that I want to install, and these are still pulled from the
fedora (Everything) repo.
Is it safe to use the repo yet or are all the packages in the process
mohammed magraby wrote:
Dear MailMan,
I have a proplem, I am using fedora 9 on 6 machines “Intel
Core 2 Due 2.40GHz, 1 GB of RAM., and I have a problem connecting to the
LAN and Internet. I am wondering if out of the box I need to do
something for Fedora to be able to get on the
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 11:01 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 10:11 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > How in evolution to you tell the program to thread by In-Reply-To
> > header and not by subject?
>
> Evo *always* threads by In-Reply-To where present and AFAIK this cannot
>
roland wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 18:11:05 +0200, Aldo Foot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:30 AM, roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello
I am using a terminalemulator Anita to login to a server, who
validates the
ssh connection with 3DES Cipher.
Do we assume that yo
Greetings. We've got a number of Fedora 9 systems at work, and most of
them seem now to be stable regarding yum updates. But on one of the
systems we're getting an error trying to do a "yum update":
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# yum -y update
There was a problem importing one of the Python modul
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:30:14AM +0200, roland wrote:
>
> I am using a terminalemulator Anita to login to a server, who validates
> the ssh connection with 3DES Cipher.
>
> Now this server is hacked, somebody entered with the root user.
> Suddenly I have ssh2
So root has been compromized?
How
Hi,
Is your FC9 the default installation or you have made some changes on the
system?
Could you please show us few lines from the system logs? /var/log/message
Could you please make sure you turned off the firewall (IPTABLES)? just for
a test.
What is the results for ifconfig -a command?
On Tue,
Two of my pc's behave different when I try to watch streaming videos,
one is 32bit and the other 64bit. Both is ok on youtube but on
http://atvs.vg.no/player/?id=18458 only the 32bit works. Is this a
common problem, or is it my pc that is failing?
any ideas?
Henning Larsen
--
fedora-list mailing
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 12:23 -0700, mohammed magraby wrote:
>
> Dear MailMan,
>
>
> I have a proplem, I am using fedora 9 on 6 machines “Intel
> Core 2 Due 2.40GHz, 1 GB of RAM., and I have a problem connecting to
> the LAN and Internet. I am wondering if out of the box I need to do
>
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 12:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
mohammed magraby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My network setup is as follows :
> 1 - Static IP to every machine
For machines with static IPs, you will almost certainly get
better networking behavior if you turn off the new default
NetworkManager service a
Dear MailMan,
I have a proplem, I am using fedora 9 on 6 machines “Intel Core 2 Due
2.40GHz, 1 GB of RAM., and I have a problem connecting to the LAN and Internet.
I am wondering if out of the box I need to do something for Fedora to be able
to get on the Internet and LAN.
My net
> e.g. Load up http://www.google.com/ and click on the about link, let
> it
> load up the about page, then go *back* to their home page. The
> "about"
> link will be in a different colour than the unvisited links on that
> page
alas; same color; it as a box around it until I move the cursor
TIA
r
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 07:25:55PM +, Beartooth wrote:
>
> I've come into possession of an otherwise nice machine (so I'm
> told; I don't speak hardware) that still has Fedora Core 5 installed. I
> want to upgrade it to F8 now, and F10 once that's released.
>
> Is there a best w
> fedora 8 firefox 3.01
> I set the visited link color to red; all links still display black on
> white
> any ideas?
Probably bad authoring on the website that you've tried it with, but you
haven't given any examples. Link colouring works as it should do with
Firefox 3.0.1 on Fedora 9, here.
thi
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:20:06AM -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
>> On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:34 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:11 -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
As I said...I don't agree with it...I'm just saying that I understand
the thinking
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Waleed Harbi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> It seems a bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431124 , try
> use ntfsresize http://www.linux-ntfs.org/doku.php?id=ntfsresize before you
> start the installation.
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 6:15 AM, Richard Sha
My /var/log/messages has over 900 copies of:
Sep 16 12:57:32 bree gnome-keyring-daemon[24951]: couldn't read 4 bytes
from client:
Sep 16 13:07:32 bree gnome-keyring-daemon[24951]: couldn't read 4 bytes
from client:
Sep 16 13:17:33 bree gnome-keyring-daemon[24951]: couldn'
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:20:06 -0700
Rick Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For example, PCI compliance says that you must render the
machines as physically difficult to get into as you can.
So, you let the Italian Communist Party dictate what you
do? :-).
That's what I lo
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 18:48:22 +0200
roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So please give me another advice,
Shut it down if you can't get back to deal with it immediately.
Your client could be currently serving as a site hosting anything from spam to
stolen credit cards to child pornography and an
> So please give me another advice, because nobody seems to know how to stop
> ssh2.
>
> Thanks for understanding
>
> Roland
Have a look at this:
http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1806
is best if you understand some details of how keys work.
~af
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redha
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:20:06 -0700
Rick Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For example, PCI compliance says that you must render the
> machines as physically difficult to get into as you can.
So, you let the Italian Communist Party dictate what you
do? :-).
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-
> Mike Burger wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:11 -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
>>>
As I said...I don't agree with it...I'm just saying that I understand
the thinking behind it.
>>> Sorry, but I think you don't. You might want to read Alan Cox's message
>>> on the fedora-test list:
>
Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:34 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:11 -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
As I said...I don't agree with it...I'm just saying that I understand
the thinking behind it.
Sorry, but I think you don't. You might want to read Alan Cox's
Mike Burger wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:11 -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
As I said...I don't agree with it...I'm just saying that I understand
the thinking behind it.
Sorry, but I think you don't. You might want to read Alan Cox's message
on the fedora-test list:
https://www.redhat.
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 18:11:05 +0200, Aldo Foot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:30 AM, roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello
I am using a terminalemulator Anita to login to a server, who validates
the
ssh connection with 3DES Cipher.
Now this server is hacked, somebody
O> IANAL, however, this doesn't sound right. I can GPL my stuff,
> and still have a EULA. I just have to be willing to supply source.
You can have an EULA providing it doesn't conflict with the GPL (and
local law). That makes the EULA for the code rather limited in what it
can contain 8)
> Most s
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:53:40AM -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
> Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:44:55AM -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
For instance, a license that says:
"you may not use this software for larceny"
*IS*NOT* Free Software.
>>> Then ISTM
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:44:55AM -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
For instance, a license that says:
"you may not use this software for larceny"
*IS*NOT* Free Software.
Then ISTM that whoever releases software which patently
could be used for criminal purpose
Everyone,
Maybe as a compromise, Mozilla (Firefox) could tie the pop-up to the
first use of the security feature and not to the start of the application.
This way distributions that didn't want the pop-up could disable the
features in the default configuration before firefox starts. And when
the
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:44:55AM -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
> Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:28:43AM -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
>>> No. For example, even with GPL, it's normal for people to insist that
>>> their software is not being released for purposes of helping
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:28:43AM -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
No. For example, even with GPL, it's normal for people to insist that
their software is not being released for purposes of helping commit
crimes. For example, some software which rips CDs include EULAs t
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:28:43AM -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
> No. For example, even with GPL, it's normal for people to insist that
> their software is not being released for purposes of helping commit
> crimes. For example, some software which rips CDs include EULAs that
> prohibit the use for d
Tim wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 08:24 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
It's absolutely pointless to have a discussion about EULA text we are
not showing.
jef"Is pretty sure that Ubuntu isn't showing this:
http://fedoraproject.org/static/firefox/ "spaleta
Some might call that a EULA, but I wouldn't
Hi;
I installed kmod-nvidia-2.6.26.3-29.fc9.x86_64 a few days ago. I just
learnt that akmod-nvidia should take care of re-compiling for the livna
nvidia driver so I installed akmod-nvidia this morning. Now I get the
"driver referenced before assignment" warning every time I boot
subsequently fol
Steve Hill wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008, Joel Rees wrote:
Did you read it?
Yep.
Some apps show you a EULA for the GPL when they install. And if you
can7t agree to the GPL, you can click disagree and refrain from
installing.
The GPL is not an EULA - the end user is not required to agree to
James Wilkinson wrote:
[...]
hadn’t been delivered. So the mailing list software sets the envelope
sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and analyses incoming e-mail
to that address to see if it’s a bounce from something it sent out.
[...]
Thanks for the explanation. I'm not a list management exp
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:30 AM, roland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am using a terminalemulator Anita to login to a server, who validates the
> ssh connection with 3DES Cipher.
>
> Now this server is hacked, somebody entered with the root user.
> Suddenly I have ssh2
>
> So now I get t
> On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:11 -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
>> As I said...I don't agree with it...I'm just saying that I understand
>> the thinking behind it.
>
> Sorry, but I think you don't. You might want to read Alan Cox's message
> on the fedora-test list:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedor
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 10:11 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> How in evolution to you tell the program to thread by In-Reply-To
> header and not by subject?
Evo *always* threads by In-Reply-To where present and AFAIK this cannot
be turned off. It only falls back to thread-by-subject when there's no
In
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 10:40 -0400, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:34 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:11 -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> > > As I said...I don't agree with it...I'm just saying that I understand
> > > the thinking behind it.
> >
> > Sorry,
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 16:58 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 15:32 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 10:09 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 03:47 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 22:26 -0430, Patrick
On Tuesday 16 September 2008 07:08:21 am Eric wrote:
> At 12:16 AM 9/16/2008, Tim wrote:
> >Such as replying to someone's
> >message instead of starting a *new* thread for a "new" message (thread
> >hijacking). Or, not doing a proper reply when you reply to someone's
> >message, like replying to s
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
If you're interested in the full story of how we've gotten to where we
are now, I've written it up here:
http://spot.livejournal.com/299409.html
Thank you - that is a very informative article.
- Steve
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] sip:[EMAIL PRO
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 06:37 -0800, Kam Leo wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 5:23 AM, Bob Marcan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:54:27 +0900
> > Joel Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Sep 16, 2008, at 4:44 PM, Andrea Mastellone wrote:
> >>
> >> > Mike wrote:
> >>
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Joel Rees wrote:
If you do not agree to the GPL, you have no license at all, and the only
thing that allows you to use the software in any way is fair use. Fair use
does not necessarily cover running the software.
Certainly not the case the world over. ISTR that UK copyr
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:45 +0100, Steve Hill wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2008, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>
> > Here's the problem... Steve hasn't actually seen how the EULA
> > situation for FF3 is handled in Fedora 9.
>
> Correct, which is why my original question was basically: does this issue
> affect
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:34 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:11 -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> > As I said...I don't agree with it...I'm just saying that I understand
> > the thinking behind it.
>
> Sorry, but I think you don't. You might want to read Alan Cox's message
>
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 5:23 AM, Bob Marcan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:54:27 +0900
> Joel Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 16, 2008, at 4:44 PM, Andrea Mastellone wrote:
>>
>> > Mike wrote:
>> >> It seems that the directory:
>> >> http://download.fedora.redhat
Il giorno lun, 15/09/2008 alle 11.41 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan ha
scritto:
> poc
Many Thanks Poc! for your exhaustive response.
--
Dario Lesca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 09:11 -0400, Mike Burger wrote:
> As I said...I don't agree with it...I'm just saying that I understand
> the thinking behind it.
Sorry, but I think you don't. You might want to read Alan Cox's message
on the fedora-test list:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/
Around 10:38am on Tuesday, September 16, 2008 (UK time), Antonio M scrawled:
> Some points:
>
> I have installed Audacity...so I imported an mp3 file and I tried to play.
> I get the message
> Error during audio device opening.Please check playback device options
> and sampling frequency of the p
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 07:08 -0400, Eric wrote:
> At 12:16 AM 9/16/2008, Tim wrote:
>
> >
> >Such as replying to someone's
> >message instead of starting a *new* thread for a "new" message (thread
> >hijacking). Or, not doing a proper reply when you reply to someone's
> >message, like replyin
I really don't have time for this tonight.
On Sep 15, 2008, at 9:01 PM, Steve Hill wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2008, Joel Rees wrote:
[...]
Some apps show you a EULA for the GPL when they install. And if
you can7t agree to the GPL, you can click disagree and refrain
from installing.
The GPL i
Try this:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=332781#c17
- Mike
Dan Steele wrote:
Hello
When I got it to recognize the sound card a lot of update came
through and now when I try to test the sound card it comes back with
this message.
audiotestsrc wave=sine freq=512 ! aud
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:54:27 +0900
Joel Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 16, 2008, at 4:44 PM, Andrea Mastellone wrote:
>
> > Mike wrote:
> >> It seems that the directory:
> >> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/8/
> >> i386.newkey
> >> has disappeared from the
Hello
When I got it to recognize the sound card a lot of update came
through and now when I try to test the sound card it comes back with this
message.
audiotestsrc wave=sine freq=512 ! audioconvert ! audioresample !
gconfaudiosink profile=music: Could not open audio device for playback
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Mike Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Mike Burger
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Mike Burger
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>>> Mike Burger wrote:
>>
94 matches
Mail list logo
