-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
as parting thoughts,
go thru 'configure kate' to see just what is set.
'r & r'. use yum to remove and replace.
you may have a squirreled install.
you never know until you try...
- --
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gate
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Trapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Somewhere along the line I saw a small script that provides a display of
> label information as a part of "fdisk -l" results. My searches have proved
> fruitless. Anyone recall such a script?
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
>
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Rick Stevens nerd.com> writes:
you really need to run 0.9.8h or 0.9.8i because of security issues.
No you don't. The only security advisory released after 0.9.8g is this:
http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20080528.txt
(There's another one on their site, but that's for ope
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:00 PM, g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Aldo Foot wrote:
>
>> I did tried that, but no dice; the cursor becomes completely inactive.
>
> what do you mean by 'completely inactive'?
It means I cannot type anything at the pr
Rick Stevens nerd.com> writes:
> you really need to run 0.9.8h or 0.9.8i because of security issues.
No you don't. The only security advisory released after 0.9.8g is this:
http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20080528.txt
(There's another one on their site, but that's for openssl-fips, not openssl
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 05:42:49PM -0400, Todd Denniston wrote:
> Ian Burrell wrote, On 10/17/2008 02:40 PM:
>> Todd Denniston ssa.crane.navy.mil> writes:
>>> 1) you don't need to call hwclock while NTP is running to keep the
>>> hardware clock synced to system time, the kernel hackers "helpfully
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aldo Foot wrote:
> I did tried that, but no dice; the cursor becomes completely inactive.
what do you mean by 'completely inactive'?
when 'terminal emulators' on my systems become 'inactive', by changing to
a different window, or as in your case, ch
Andras Simon gmail.com> writes:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
That's the process for new packages, not for updates to existing ones. Updates
don't have to get reviewed, but they have to be careful about not bre
--- On Fri, 10/17/08, Kevin Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Kevin Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: How to talk ethernet to windows
> To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora."
>
> Date: Friday, October 17, 2008, 4:08 PM
> Colin Paul Adams wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:15 PM, g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Aldo Foot wrote:
>> --Move the Terminal
>> Right-click on the Terminal icon on the lower sidebar and
>> select "Left Sidebar" to place the terminal on the left
>> side. At this
Markku Kolkka wrote:
> There's a lack of trust, not lack of certification. Those are two
> different things when talking about the GPG/PGP "web of trust"
> certification scheme. You haven't specified the level of trust that
> you have on the keys used to certify the Fedora signing key.
Setting the
"Andras Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10/17/08, Linuxguy123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm waiting for gimp2.6, kernel 2.6.27 and open-office 3.0. If I am not
>> mistaken, there are a couple evolution releases that haven't been
>> accepted either.
>>
>> All of these packages have bee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aldo Foot wrote:
> --Move the Terminal
> Right-click on the Terminal icon on the lower sidebar and
> select "Left Sidebar" to place the terminal on the left
> side. At this point the cursor may or may not become a little
if cursor place indicato
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 10:57 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > I don't see the reason for this change since all it does is eliminate
> > the ucred structure definition without defining any replacement.
>
> This has nothing to do with replacing it. The #ifdef is need
Antonio M ha scritto:
2008/10/17 Arch Willingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
DVD are not going to be seen any more??? Bill, still there
Ciao Antonio,
a simply fast search on google is pointing me to:
http://rpmforge.net/user/packages/libdvdcss/
Please, don't forget laws are different from con
Ian Burrell wrote, On 10/17/2008 02:40 PM:
Todd Denniston ssa.crane.navy.mil> writes:
1) you don't need to call hwclock while NTP is running to keep the hardware
clock synced to system time, the kernel hackers "helpfully" put a sneak
circuit in the ntp implementation in the _kernel_ such that
Arthur Pemberton gmail.com> writes:
> I would guess that that is mostly due to limited manpower: new
> packages needed to be rebuilt and rereviewed.
Don't forget also that there may also be residual problems with the newest
versions - I am not sure that kernel 2.6.27 is entirely bug-free and
run
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Linuxguy123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm waiting for gimp2.6, kernel 2.6.27 and open-office 3.0. If I am not
> mistaken, there are a couple evolution releases that haven't been
> accepted either.
>
> All of these packages have been released for general distribu
Linuxguy123 wrote:
I'm waiting for gimp2.6, kernel 2.6.27 and open-office 3.0. If I am not
mistaken, there are a couple evolution releases that haven't been
accepted either.
All of these packages have been released for general distribution
outside of the Fedora community. Why does it take so
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aldo Foot wrote:
>
>> Kate's embedded terminal is helpful when writing programs.
>> It works well as long as it's located at the Lower Sidebar.
>> The terminal freezes up if it's moved to the left, right
>> or upper sidebar.
On 10/17/08, Linuxguy123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm waiting for gimp2.6, kernel 2.6.27 and open-office 3.0. If I am not
> mistaken, there are a couple evolution releases that haven't been
> accepted either.
>
> All of these packages have been released for general distribution
> outside of th
Colin Paul Adams wrote:
> I have a fedora 9 box which is connected to my wireless network (via
> network manager).
>
> It also has an ethernet port, and there is a windows xp professional
> box in the same room with an ethernet port too. I have a cable to
> connect the two boxes together.
>
> So
mike kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika perjantai, 17. lokakuuta
2008):
> My question is do I need to worry about the lack of
> certification?
There's a lack of trust, not lack of certification. Those are two
different things when talking about the GPG/PGP "web of trust"
certification scheme.
I'm waiting for gimp2.6, kernel 2.6.27 and open-office 3.0. If I am not
mistaken, there are a couple evolution releases that haven't been
accepted either.
All of these packages have been released for general distribution
outside of the Fedora community. Why does it take so long for them to
be a
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:33:07 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm not sure where to file this in bugzilla, so I'll start off here.
> This is kind of a developer question but not a Fedora development
> question and the exact rpm (glibc-headers) is not called out in bugzilla
>
I had CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-750-linux-gnu- in my environment. Grrr.
It's building fine now.
Robert
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 13:04 -0600, Robert Wuest wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to rebuild my kernel before I do some patching to it, and I'm
> running into an error.
>
> I've downloaded the src
Aldo Foot wrote:
> Kate's embedded terminal is helpful when writing programs.
> It works well as long as it's located at the Lower Sidebar.
> The terminal freezes up if it's moved to the left, right
> or upper sidebar.
Can you give me steps to follow to reproduce this? (In particular, I'm not
su
On 17.10.2008 16:35, Jim wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 12.10.2008 21:26, Jim wrote:
Beartooth wrote:
On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:24:03 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
[...]
The madwifi drivers at Livna does not work as they should for the
2.6.26 kernels.
Did you (or somebody else) file a bug s
mike wrote:
> I have a real basic question about verifying your download for Fedora 7,
> 8 and 9. I'm new to keys, signatures, certification, etc. and I haven't
> been able to find what I need in the Fedora help resources. Apologies
> if this is the wrong place to post or if a similar post appe
Hi,
I'm trying to rebuild my kernel before I do some patching to it, and I'm
running into an error.
I've downloaded the src.rpm and installed it
$ rpm -i kernel-2.6.26.5-45.fc9.src.rpm
cd to my SPECS and run
$ rpmbuild -bb --target=`uname -m` kernel.spec
(in my case, uname -m is x86_64)
Aft
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Antonio M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/10/17 Arch Willingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I don't see where anyone answered youI am wondering the same thing.
>>
>> Arch
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beha
KDE 4.1.1
2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686
I want to check the update configuration
the icon for update system is still there
Since a strange yum update,
I think the update has been somehow set to automatic.
Un expected yum results:
LMKIII (root) ~ [1000]>yum update
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
I have a fedora 9 box which is connected to my wireless network (via
network manager).
It also has an ethernet port, and there is a windows xp professional
box in the same room with an ethernet port too. I have a cable to
connect the two boxes together.
So I want to set up a lan with the linux en
Todd Denniston ssa.crane.navy.mil> writes:
>
> 1) you don't need to call hwclock while NTP is running to keep the hardware
> clock synced to system time, the kernel hackers "helpfully" put a sneak
> circuit in the ntp implementation in the _kernel_ such that if NTP declares a
> good sync with
Kate's embedded terminal is helpful when writing programs.
It works well as long as it's located at the Lower Sidebar.
The terminal freezes up if it's moved to the left, right
or upper sidebar.
Is this a Kate bug?
I'm running Fedora 8. Does this happen in the more
recent Fedora releases?
--
fed
Hi,
I have a real basic question about verifying your download for Fedora 7,
8 and 9. I'm new to keys, signatures, certification, etc. and I haven't
been able to find what I need in the Fedora help resources. Apologies
if this is the wrong place to post or if a similar post appears (not
sure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> I don't see the reason for this change since all it does is eliminate
> the ucred structure definition without defining any replacement.
This has nothing to do with replacing it. The #ifdef is needed for
namespace h
Somewhere along the line I saw a small script that provides a display of
label information as a part of "fdisk -l" results. My searches have
proved fruitless. Anyone recall such a script?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/
Hey all,
I'm not sure where to file this in bugzilla, so I'll start off here.
This is kind of a developer question but not a Fedora development
question and the exact rpm (glibc-headers) is not called out in bugzilla
and I'm not sure if I should file it under glibc or what.
A netw
Ryan wrote:
> How do you get rid of the favorites folder in the classic KDE
> application menu? I am running fedora 9 with KDE 4 if it makes any
> difference.
Afaik, the classic/kickoff menus are pretty much not configurable at all (at
the moment).
-- Rex
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-li
Chris wrote, On 10/17/2008 06:46 AM:
First of all, thanks for all the replies. Some useful suggestions in there
which I'll be trying this morning.
2008/10/17 Mikkel L. Ellertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
runs "/sbin/hwclock --utc --hctosys" to sync the hardware clock to
the system clock.
But this i
2008/10/17 Arch Willingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I don't see where anyone answered youI am wondering the same thing.
>
> Arch
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kwhiskerz
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:19 PM
> To: fedora-list@
How do you get rid of the favorites folder in the classic KDE
application menu? I am running fedora 9 with KDE 4 if it makes any
difference.
Thank You,
Ryan
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redha
I don't see where anyone answered youI am wondering the same thing.
Arch
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kwhiskerz
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:19 PM
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Subject: libdvdcss [quasi OT, quasi not OT]
I read
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris wrote:
> Thanks for the idea but these machines are sent out to various sites,
ok. if system time syncing is supper critical, have you considered time
sync with a radio clock? again, check '/usr/share/doc/ntp*'. and you
can google for suppliers
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 12.10.2008 21:26, Jim wrote:
Beartooth wrote:
On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:24:03 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
[...]
The madwifi drivers at Livna does not work as they should for the
2.6.26 kernels.
Did you (or somebody else) file a bug so this can be fixed? Then we
c
2008/10/17 g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> if you would like to make your life a little easier, set up one of
> your local boxes, that has internet access, to act as a local server.
>
> let it check 'outside' for time, then you can sync all boxes to a
> local time server and *all* of you local network wil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris wrote:
> Oh yes, I'm having the time of my life. :) Thanks for the suggestions.
if you would like to make your life a little easier, set up one of
your local boxes, that has internet access, to act as a local server.
let it check 'outside' for
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 09:46 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 16:33 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I'm getting messages like the above every few minutes, e.g.:
> >
> > Oct 15 15:19:26 bree gnome-keyring-daemon[6922]: couldn't read 4 bytes from
> > client:
> > Oct 15 15:19
On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 20:49 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Aaron Konstam wrote:
> >> On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 01:57 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >>> Aaron Konstam wrote:
> OK, installing those extra rpms make totem work. But that leaves us
> with
> two questi
Sean Bruno wrote:
> Just a notice, if you are using Flash and install the recently released
> Flash 10 for linux, you'll need to install curl-devel to get it to
> acutally work.
Hadn't seen it posted in this thead yet... so, here's the scoop:
http://wtogami.livejournal.com/28504.html
http://macro
2008/10/17 Todd Denniston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote, On 10/16/2008 05:23 PM:
>>
>> What are you trying to do with this cron job? You are updating the
>> system clock from the hardware clock, and not the other way around,
>> as you say you are trying to do. The system does syn
First of all, thanks for all the replies. Some useful suggestions in there
which I'll be trying this morning.
2008/10/17 Mikkel L. Ellertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> runs "/sbin/hwclock --utc --hctosys" to sync the hardware clock to
> the system clock.
>
> But this is syncing the system clock to the
I have this same problem in Fedora 9 (2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686).
/usr/lib/firefox-3.0.2/run-mozilla.sh: line 131: 3357 Segmentation fault
"$prog" ${1+"$@"}
Try running firefox in safe mode (firefox --safe-mode).
--
This is an email sent via The Fedora Community Portal https://fcp.surfsite.or
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 16:33 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I'm getting messages like the above every few minutes, e.g.:
>
> Oct 15 15:19:26 bree gnome-keyring-daemon[6922]: couldn't read 4 bytes from
> client:
> Oct 15 15:19:26 bree gnome-keyring-daemon[6922]: couldn't read 4 bytes from
> c
55 matches
Mail list logo
