Noel Zeng wrote:
> *That spatial mode leaves behind tons of windows, inconvenient for users.
> And I know you can use Shift-Doubleclick or simply change it browser mode,
> but why on earth would most of Fedora users have to suffer this
> inconvenience simply because the powers that be happened to l
Tim wrote:
> Don't you mean "update"? "Upgrade" is for changing releases.
"upgrade" also processes Obsoletes tags. You should always use "upgrade".
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidel
Tim wrote:
On Sun, 2008-12-21 at 05:28 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Please open a terminal and run:
su -c "yum upgrade"
Don't you mean "update"? "Upgrade" is for changing releases
It isn't. Read the man page.
Rahul
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: ht
Tim:
>> Five seconds is probably ambitious, but I still like how my old Amiga
>> would COLD BOOT in 13 seconds, warm boot was 11 seconds. That's from
>> off, to fully working system.
g:
> also, think about how much memory you had and was it 8 bit. hard drives?
No, not 8 bits. ;-) But there was
On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 11:29 -0600, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> One other thing - was the Amiga booting from ROM?
Only partially. Though the point was more about efficiency in a system,
versus not.
--
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.7-53.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, th
On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 13:12 -0500, Steve wrote:
> It appears that this started between Dec 9 and Dec 10 and the only
> thing that was updated was cups.
> Any ideas?
Look through yum.log rather than just the logwatch email, for other
things around that date. Logwatch is often behind, or even crazi
Tim:
>> Often, you really don't have much of a choice of what graphics hardware
>> to pick from. Before I bought my laptop, I spent ages researching what
>> I could buy locally. My choices were NVidia, ATI, and some Intel
>> chipset that I couldn't see listed as being supported.
Kevin Kofler:
>
On Sun, 2008-12-21 at 04:46 +, Noel Zeng wrote:
> That spatial mode leaves behind tons of windows, inconvenient for
> users. And I know you can use Shift-Doubleclick or simply change it
> browser mode, but why on earth would most of Fedora users have to
> suffer this inconvenience simply becaus
"David Orman" writes:
> Renders fine for me...
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.4) Gecko/2008111217 Fedora/
> 3.0.4-1.fc10 Firefox/3.0.4
>
>
> Only plugin in FF is Adblock Plus.
>
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:11 PM, Marcelo Magno T. Sales
> wrote:
>
> Em Sáb 20 Dez 2
On Sun, 2008-12-21 at 05:28 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Please open a terminal and run:
> su -c "yum upgrade"
Don't you mean "update"? "Upgrade" is for changing releases.
--
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.7-53.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I
r
Ed Greshko greshko.com> writes:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_access_poll
OK, you may argue that there is not enough proof to show that the poll is
reflective of normal users, but the other reasons for change are compelling
enough, methinks.
It is also a difficult ask for a scientific surv
Todd Zullinger wrote, On 12/20/2008 05:00 PM (EEST):
Aleksandar Kostadinov wrote:
does publican have any homepage and binary packages for download
(not fedora RPMs).
Yep: https://fedorahosted.org/publican/
Thanks!
I did find only http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/Publican and
http
Noel Zeng wrote:
> Ed Greshko greshko.com> writes:
>
>
>> It isn't the content of the pollit is the polling methodology.
>>
>> But, never mind. I'm glad important things are decided by these "polls".
>>
>
> I stand by my poll. You haven't addressed my points about the methodology,
Ed Greshko greshko.com> writes:
> It isn't the content of the pollit is the polling methodology.
>
> But, never mind. I'm glad important things are decided by these "polls".
I stand by my poll. You haven't addressed my points about the methodology, as
stated in my first post.
I have ne
Renders fine for me...
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.4) Gecko/2008111217
Fedora/3.0.4-1.fc10 Firefox/3.0.4
[orma...@ormandj-laptop ~]$ rpm -qi firefox
Name: firefox Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 3.0.4 Ven
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:36:30 +0100
DB wrote:
> Evening all,
>
> I just did the latest batch of F9 PackageKit updates - with
> disastrous effect! (See attached list)
Quite strange. How did you apply those updates?
PackageKit? yum? With what command?
Is there anything non standard in your /etc
--- On Sat, 12/20/08, Noel Zeng wrote:
> From: Noel Zeng
> Subject: Re: Call for vote: Nautilus use Browser view for fedora 11
> To: fedora-list@redhat.com
> Date: Saturday, December 20, 2008, 9:04 PM
> Ed Greshko greshko.com> writes:
>
> > Doesn't matter
> >
> > It is only a poll of thos
Em Sáb 20 Dez 2008, Marc Schwartz escreveu:
> "Marcelo Magno T. Sales" writes:
> > Hi, people
> >
> > Some sites I visit are displayed with text rendering problems when
> > I see them in FX3 on F10. However, FX3 on Windows displays them
> > correctly. I've setup fonts in the Linux version exactly
Noel Zeng wrote:
> Ed Greshko greshko.com> writes:
>
>
>> Doesn't matter
>>
>> It is only a poll of those people who have decided to respond.No
>> better than the various CNN online polls an those types.
>>
>
> So according to you, there won't be a way of determining whether people
Ed Greshko greshko.com> writes:
> Doesn't matter
>
> It is only a poll of those people who have decided to respond.No
> better than the various CNN online polls an those types.
So according to you, there won't be a way of determining whether people like
something or not? Because, if one
Noel Zeng wrote:
> Ed Greshko greshko.com> writes:
>
>
>> Woopie
>>
>> I hope you realized this type of "poll" is totally unscientific and
>> meaningless.
>>
>>
>
> Unscientific and meaningless? How so? I bet you didn't even read the poll.
>
Doesn't matter
It is only a poll of
Ed Greshko greshko.com> writes:
> Woopie
>
> I hope you realized this type of "poll" is totally unscientific and
> meaningless.
>
Unscientific and meaningless? How so? I bet you didn't even read the poll.
I kept my personal opinion out of my poll question and my post. Neutral and fair
des
stan wrote:
> I installed all updates from updates and updates testing for Fedora 10
> x86_64. When I try to start the service
> configuration from either the menu or the command line it fails. I
> remember seeing something about a dbus error but I
> thought that was fixed. Here is the error mes
Frank Cox wrote:
> A new wireless signal showed up on Network Manager on my Fedora 10 laptop
> yesterday named "Free Public Wifi".
You've fallen prey to the most widespread "SSID virus". It might not even
have been intended as such, but it's spreading like one. As others have
said, remove that SSI
Steven W. Orr wrote:
> I'm interested in trying it but I have no idea how to activate it. It
> looks cool. Where do I start?
Install compiz-kde, then pick the Compiz Switcher from the menu or run
desktop-effects-kde (that's its internal name) from a terminal. I think the
default window manager can
fred smith wrote:
> I'm trying to compile gnomesword.
You _do_ realize that gnomesword is already packaged in Fedora?
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/
Dave Feustel wrote:
> yum groupinstall LXDE fails (not found).
Are you on F10? LXDE is new in F10.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/Ma
g wrote:
> so what is patch?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323469
It's a source patch though, I haven't published any packages with it yet.
I'd have hoped the official Fedora PolicyKit (and PolicyKit upstream) to get
fixed, but it looks I was too optimistic there. :-(
Ke
Tim wrote:
> KDE's even worse - whacking great big menu, needs a search function to
> find things because it's two awkward to use as a menu. A gazillion and
> one configuration options that you fiddle with rather than actually use
> the computer.
Right-click, switch to Classic style menu. 2 click
Mark wrote:
> Also something important.
> I also installed (and removed) compiz fusion. KDE seems to go way more
> smoother with compiz fusion then with anything else so perhaps good to
> try that out.
> I had to install and use the emerald decoration manager to get it all
> working.
Is the kde4-w
Tim wrote:
> Often, you really don't have much of a choice of what graphics hardware
> to pick from. Before I bought my laptop, I spent ages researching what
> I could buy locally. My choices were NVidia, ATI, and some Intel
> chipset that I couldn't see listed as being supported.
Chances are it
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Mark wrote:
>> To be completely off topic -- the discussion about browser mode seems
>> over anyway -- the kde 4 menu does suck. besides that it's buggy it's
>> not intuitive although it might be better if the existing bugs are
>> fixed. The o
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson
wrote:
> Richard Shaw wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Michael Cronenworth
>> wrote:
>>> Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Sorry,
I guess it was ambiguous. That's what I have at which point it fails on
booting and when
I t
Frank Cox wrote:
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:13:54 -0600
Les Mikesell wrote:
You see those all over the place and can tell from the 'ad hoc' mode
that it is another computer instead of a real access point. I always
thought it was a scam trying to steal passwords or something, but I
guess it's
elk dolk wrote:
Hi all,
Instead of seeing the beautiful blue & white progress bar I want to see the
boot sequence detail. How can I change it?
still does the trick to get details when you want them. Seems to
work more consistantly than .
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.c
Mark wrote:
> To be completely off topic -- the discussion about browser mode seems
> over anyway -- the kde 4 menu does suck. besides that it's buggy it's
> not intuitive although it might be better if the existing bugs are
> fixed. The only thing it is is looking better then what was the
> classi
Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>> Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>> Sorry,
>>> I guess it was ambiguous. That's what I have at which point it fails on
>>> booting and when
>>> I type 0x34B at the prompt, it then works.
>>>
>> Not to sound rude, but cou
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Is there a fixed policy on how fedora must relate to upstream packages?
> That is, do you have a requirement to take every default that the
> upstream has (themes, etc.)? Or can any packager make any whimsical
> change he wants at any time? Or something in between?
The pa
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>
>> Sorry,
>> I guess it was ambiguous. That's what I have at which point it fails on
>> booting and when
>> I type 0x34B at the prompt, it then works.
>>
>
> Not to sound rude, but could you copy/paste the ex
Ed Greshko wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Noel Zeng wrote:
Mark gmail.com> writes:
Hey,
The question is simple:
Lets use the browser view of nautilus in the next fedora release.
Hi all,
I decided to set up a poll in Fedora Foru
"Marcelo Magno T. Sales" writes:
> Hi, people
>
> Some sites I visit are displayed with text rendering problems when I see
> them in FX3 on F10. However, FX3 on Windows displays them correctly.
> I've setup fonts in the Linux version exactly the same as they are in
> Windows.
> Most common pro
Mark wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Noel Zeng wrote:
>
>> Mark gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> The question is simple:
>>> Lets use the browser view of nautilus in the next fedora release.
>>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I decided to set up a poll in Fedora Forum -
>> ht
Hi,
anyone managed to subscribe to Fedora 10 Stables feed? I always get:
"500 Internal error
The server encountered an unexpected condition which prevented it from
fulfilling the request."
Other feeds (Pending, Testing and Security) are all fine.
Regards,
Andre
--
fedora-list mailing list
fe
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 15:50:36 -0600
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> Well, I am not too good with HAL rules yet, but you could try a udev
> rule something like this:
>
> ACTION=="add", ATTR{idVendor}=="1410", ATTR{idProduct}=="5010",
> run="/usr/sbin/eject $DEVPATH", OPTIONS="last_rule"
>
> The rule
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Noel Zeng wrote:
> Mark gmail.com> writes:
>
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> The question is simple:
>> Lets use the browser view of nautilus in the next fedora release.
>
> Hi all,
>
> I decided to set up a poll in Fedora Forum -
> http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?
g wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Konstantin Svist wrote:
So my question is, how plausible is running Fedora without initrd? Don't
the majority of users out there have similar hardware, making initrd
unnecessary?
'similar' is not the same as 'same'.
if every computer ha
I installed all updates from updates and updates testing for Fedora 10 x86_64. When I try to start the service
configuration from either the menu or the command line it fails. I remember seeing something about a dbus error but I
thought that was fixed. Here is the error messages I get.
# sys
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:13:54 -0600
Les Mikesell wrote:
> You see those all over the place and can tell from the 'ad hoc' mode
> that it is another computer instead of a real access point. I always
> thought it was a scam trying to steal passwords or something, but I
> guess it's just another c
On a F10 laptop, when I insert a commercial movie dvd I get a window that tells
me "you have just inserted a video dvd" and gives me an opportunity to select a
default application to open it with. However, the bar to make the selection in
says "no applications found".
A bit of google-searching te
g wrote:
> Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>
>> If you build your own kernel, with everything you need to boot built
>> in, then you do not need an initrd. I guess I am not in the
>> "majority" because none of my machines has the same hardware. One
>
> nice collection of 'toys'.
>
Thanks.
> if you h
Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:33:19 -0600
> Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>
>> I am glad to hear you have it working.
>
> I'm very pleased about that, myself.
>
>> Maybe a HAL rule to eject the SCSI device the Novatel as soon as it
>> is detected? Or a udev rule that does the same thing
Evening all,
I just did the latest batch of F9 PackageKit updates - with disastrous
effect! (See attached list)
I think (!) RPM is still working but Packagekit & yum amongst (many)
others have gone. I've tried to re enable the rpmfusion reps & rpm
tells me that the latest ones are installe
Passed on as requested.
Thanks Marko.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:24:04
From: Marko Vojinovic
Reply-To: vma...@phy.bg.ac.yu
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Cc: Steven W. Orr
Subject: Re: How do I activate compiz on kde with F10?
On Saturday 20 December 2008 05
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> If you build your own kernel, with everything you need to boot built
> in, then you do not need an initrd. I guess I am not in the
> "majority" because none of my machines has the same hardware. One
nice collection of 'to
Hi, people
Some sites I visit are displayed with text rendering problems when I see
them in FX3 on F10. However, FX3 on Windows displays them correctly.
I've setup fonts in the Linux version exactly the same as they are in
Windows.
Most common problems is text being truncated, or text that shou
Mark gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hey,
>
> The question is simple:
> Lets use the browser view of nautilus in the next fedora release.
Hi all,
I decided to set up a poll in Fedora Forum -
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=208330 - vote there guys!
Regards,
Noel.
--
fedora-list maili
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Mark wrote:
>>
>> I
>> think i am indeed getting done a part of what i hoped and that's
>> raising awareness that this option in nautilus should be changed and
>> that the majority of any linux related community is in favor of it. I
>> don
Konstantin Svist wrote:
>
> IIRC, the idea was to initialize hardware in parallel. The only thing
> (?) required for this to work is using kernel alone, without initrd.
> So my question is, how plausible is running Fedora without initrd? Don't
> the majority of users out there have similar hardwar
I am using F9.
I have noted, that for some reason, having local Nautilus
browsers and one (or more) remote Nautilus browsers
can cause problems.
For example, I have several local browsers opened, then
occasionally I would have one or more remote NTFS mounts
with remote browsers with each of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Konstantin Svist wrote:
> So my question is, how plausible is running Fedora without initrd? Don't
> the majority of users out there have similar hardware, making initrd
> unnecessary?
'similar' is not the same as 'same'.
if every computer had *exac
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>>
>> That's a copout excuse. You are spending a lot of time right now
>> beating your head on the brick wall on this issue. Figuring out a
>> technical solution in the form of a LiveCD under the umbrella of the
>> GNOME
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Mark wrote:
>>
>> 2. I always was under the impression that gnome especially was a
>> democracy but it turns out it's under dictatorship and then call it:
>> "Meritocracy" with a dictator like taste.
>>
>
> I have yet to see any Free and ope
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:39:54 -0500, Weiner, Michael wrote:
> I have an unusual request from a user that I support, who would like me
> to deactivate (or disable) the password request that occurs after the
> screen is locked in an X session. He runs KDE and when the session is
> inactive, it locks
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
That's a copout excuse. You are spending a lot of time right now
beating your head on the brick wall on this issue. Figuring out a
technical solution in the form of a LiveCD under the umbrella of the
GNOME project might actually be the better argument than what you are
doin
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 20:53 +0100, Mark wrote:
Btw your idea of "my spin idea" might very well be true ^_^ it's just
that it sucks up so much time which i don't want to spend at it.
Creating a sabayon profile with your favourite changes and storing it
away in some safe
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Mark wrote:
>> Now that you say it like that you might be right.
>
> I'm always right. That has never been the problem for me. Its just
> one of those inherent truths of the universe.
don't get over confide
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Mark wrote:
> Now that you say it like that you might be right.
I'm always right. That has never been the problem for me. Its just
one of those inherent truths of the universe.
But you know what, its not enough for me to be right all the time.
The skill I've had
On 12/14/2008 09:30 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:18:50 + (GMT)
Patrick Dupre wrote:
If crond was interrupted for some reasons, does anacron would restart it
at 12:11 ?
I can't for the life of me figure out when anacron decides to do what,
I just know that things a
2. I always was under the impression that gnome especially was a
democracy but it turns out it's under dictatorship and then call it:
"Meritocracy" with a dictator like taste.
No, gnome is not a democracy at all, and does not claim to be. The
individual module maintainers basically have total c
On Saturday 20 December 2008, Frank Cox wrote:
>On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:29:37 -0600
>
>Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>> One other thing - was the Amiga booting from ROM?
>
>Depends on the Amiga. On the 500 and 1000 models, you had to boot from a
>Kickstart disk, then boot from a Workbench disk. The 2
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 20:53 +0100, Mark wrote:
>
>> Btw your idea of "my spin idea" might very well be true ^_^ it's just
>> that it sucks up so much time which i don't want to spend at it.
>>
>
> Creating a sabayon profile with your favour
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Mark wrote:
>>>
>> To all other ppl. please keep the usability list included since this
>> really is something they should be aware of.
>>
>
> Keep in mind that cross-posting to multiple lists sucks for everyone who is
> not a member of all of
Steven W. Orr wrote:
I noticed that the new F10 boot process is supposed to be somewhat
faster because it took advantage of a new package called readahead.
That's incorrect. Readahead had nothing to do with Fedora boot
optimization.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureBetterStartup f
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Mark wrote:
>> What do you expect of me?
>> I started nice and what did i get in return: "we don't vote here" and
>> there is no other way to get the word out.
>
> No mark you didn't start nice. You started
Mark wrote:
To all other ppl. please keep the usability list included since this
really is something they should be aware of.
Keep in mind that cross-posting to multiple lists sucks for everyone who
is not a member of all of them because they'll get bounces pointing that
out, and there's a
Konstantin Svist wrote:
> Don't some programs interpret -- as stdin?
I've never run into one. If anything is interpreted as stdin, it's
usually just a single -.
--
ToddOpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Mark wrote:
> What do you expect of me?
> I started nice and what did i get in return: "we don't vote here" and
> there is no other way to get the word out.
No mark you didn't start nice. You started out demanding a vote in
order to coerce a change. Demanding a
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 08:14:18PM +0100, Mark wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 07:02:26PM +0100, Mark wrote:
> >> To the people reading the gnome usability list and see this for the
> >> first time.. look here for the full discussion (about
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Mark wrote:
>> To the people reading the gnome usability list and see this for the
>> first time.. look here for the full discussion (about 150 posts):
>> http://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?to
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:59:09 -0800
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
Is this some
quirkiness in the way command arguments are
being handled?
No quirkiness. Options start with -, putting quotes around a
string doesn't change the fact that it starts with a -, it
just changes t
Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:59:09 -0800
> Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>
>
>> Is this some
>> quirkiness in the way command arguments are
>> being handled?
>>
>
> No quirkiness. Options start with -, putting quotes around a
> string doesn't change the fact that it starts with a
Konstantin Svist wrote:
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
I wonder why this fails:
# touch '-foo'
touch: invalid option -- 'o'
# touch '\-foo' (works)
# mv '-foo' foo
mv: invalid option -- 'o'
Try `mv --help' for more information.
What confuses me is, if foo was surrounded by
double-quotes, th
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> 2008/12/20 Toshio Kuratomi :
>> I don't think rpm packages are the right way to do this. There might be
>> some interesting way to extend sabayon to be a "configuration package
>> tool", though. That would be highly experimental and is like
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Mark wrote:
> To the people reading the gnome usability list and see this for the
> first time.. look here for the full discussion (about 150 posts):
> http://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=65669&viewmode=flat&order=ASC&start=0
Mark, you nee
Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Konstantin Svist wrote:
>> There was a 5-second Linux entry a while back, and it was mentioned that
>> 2.6.27 should boot in 1 second (with .5-second boot coming in 2.6.28)
>> I'm not seeing it on the F10 install (updated to latest release
>> version).
>> I'm guessing that's
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:59:09 -0800
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> Is this some
> quirkiness in the way command arguments are
> being handled?
No quirkiness. Options start with -, putting quotes around a
string doesn't change the fact that it starts with a -, it
just changes the work the shell does to
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 07:02:26PM +0100, Mark wrote:
>> To the people reading the gnome usability list and see this for the
>> first time.. look here for the full discussion (about 150 posts):
>> http://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopi
Frank Cox wrote:
A new wireless signal showed up on Network Manager on my Fedora 10 laptop
yesterday named "Free Public Wifi".
As there has never, to my knowledge, been any announcement of anyone providing
free public wifi in Melville, I became quite curious about this and attempted
to connect t
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>
> I wonder why this fails:
>
> # touch '-foo'
> touch: invalid option -- 'o'
>
> # touch '\-foo' (works)
> # mv '-foo' foo
> mv: invalid option -- 'o'
> Try `mv --help' for more information.
>
> What confuses me is, if foo was surrounded by
> double-quotes, then expa
I wonder why this fails:
# touch '-foo'
touch: invalid option -- 'o'
# touch '\-foo' (works)
# mv '-foo' foo
mv: invalid option -- 'o'
Try `mv --help' for more information.
What confuses me is, if foo was surrounded by
double-quotes, then expansion may be a problem
but with single-quotes,
A new wireless signal showed up on Network Manager on my Fedora 10 laptop
yesterday named "Free Public Wifi".
As there has never, to my knowledge, been any announcement of anyone providing
free public wifi in Melville, I became quite curious about this and attempted
to connect to it.
However, whi
2008/12/20 David Nielsen :
>
>
> 2008/12/20 Mark
>>
>>
>> And for this entire issue where i made this thread for in the first
>> place. Don't expect me to be silent now. I will be vocal about this.
>> fedora has a "freedom" sign in it's logo so make that a reality!
>
> And you remain with the free
John Austin wrote:
On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 13:07 -0500, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Reg Clemens wrote:
Thanks, I loaded all the modules mentioned above with yum.
BOY, the i386 modules pulled in a LOT of other 386 modules, but
I guess thats why we have big disks today...
Frank Cox wrote:
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:29:37 -0600
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
One other thing - was the Amiga booting from ROM?
Depends on the Amiga. On the 500 and 1000 models, you had to boot from a
Kickstart disk, then boot from a Workbench disk. The 2000 had a Kickstart rom,
but you th
On Sat, 2008-12-20 at 13:07 -0500, Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > Reg Clemens wrote:
> >> Thanks, I loaded all the modules mentioned above with yum.
> >> BOY, the i386 modules pulled in a LOT of other 386 modules, but
> >> I guess thats why we have big disks today...
> >>
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Reg Clemens wrote:
Thanks, I loaded all the modules mentioned above with yum.
BOY, the i386 modules pulled in a LOT of other 386 modules, but
I guess thats why we have big disks today...
There's a 64-bit flash plugin now available. I'd suggest installing that
in
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Dimi Paun wrote:
>> So what do we get for asking that we see this changed?
>> - snide remarks
>
> In this thread..ive seen snide comments from multiple parties on both
> sides. I've seen a round in the cycl
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson
wrote:
> Anoop wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson
>>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> How did you enable the services? I suspect that you only enabled
>>> them for run level 3, and not run level 5.
>> Yes you are right. Anyway,
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 11:33:19 -0600
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
> I am glad to hear you have it working.
I'm very pleased about that, myself.
> Maybe a HAL rule to eject the SCSI device the Novatel as soon as it
> is detected? Or a udev rule that does the same thing? Just as a
> temporary fix? If
Anoop wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson
>
> wrote:
>>
>> How did you enable the services? I suspect that you only enabled
>> them for run level 3, and not run level 5.
> Yes you are right. Anyway, I have solved the problem now.
>
> Thanks,
> Anoop
>
An easy way to
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
