starry background

2009-02-18 Thread brian hurren
Just created a realistic starry background but i can't figure out how to upload it so everyone can see it. I've created an account. Get the world#39;s best email - http://nz.mail.yahoo.com/___ Fedora-art-list mailing list

Re: starry background

2009-02-18 Thread Martin Sourada
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 07:34 -0800, brian hurren wrote: Just created a realistic starry background but i can't figure out how to upload it so everyone can see it. I've created an account. Use https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Special:Upload and set something descriptive for file name,

Re: starry background

2009-02-18 Thread Nicu Buculei
Martin Sourada wrote: On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 07:34 -0800, brian hurren wrote: Just created a realistic starry background but i can't figure out how to upload it so everyone can see it. I've created an account. Use https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Special:Upload and set something descriptive for

Re: starry background

2009-02-18 Thread Ian Weller
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 06:21:03PM +0200, Nicu Buculei wrote: Since he is not [yet] part of any group, I don't think he can use fedorapeople, not sure about the wiki... If you can log in, you can upload. -- Ian Weller ianwel...@gmail.com http://ianweller.org GnuPG

Background

2009-02-18 Thread Paul W. Frields
Hi team, I was looking at the F11 Artwork page on the wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F11_Artwork ...and wondering about (1) the group's progress in converging on a background, and (2) what needs to happen, and when, for the background to land in the F11 Beta. The F11 Beta freeze arrives

Re: [PATCH] Add compatibility back in for older versions of Yum.

2009-02-18 Thread Mike Bonnet
James Antill wrote: On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 10:29 -0600, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote: We would like for Koji to remain compatible with the version of Yum that is shipped with RHEL 5. Signed-off-by: Jeffrey C. Ollie j...@ocjtech.us --- builder/mergerepos | 11 +++ 1 files changed, 7

Error from repoview when composing with pungi.

2009-02-18 Thread William F. Acker WB2FLW +1 303 722 7209
Hi all, I'm not sure which new package might have broken this; I think I succeeded after upgrading yum, but I can't be sure. Here's the spewage. Pungi:ERROR: Got an error from /usr/bin/repoview Pungi:ERROR: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/repoview, line 926, in

Re: Error from repoview when composing with pungi.

2009-02-18 Thread seth vidal
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 09:10 -0700, William F. Acker WB2FLW +1 303 722 7209 wrote: Hi all, I'm not sure which new package might have broken this; I think I succeeded after upgrading yum, but I can't be sure. Here's the spewage. Pungi:ERROR: Got an error from

Re: Error from repoview when composing with pungi.

2009-02-18 Thread William F. Acker WB2FLW +1 303 722 7209
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, seth vidal wrote: On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 09:10 -0700, William F. Acker WB2FLW +1 303 722 7209 wrote: Hi all, I'm not sure which new package might have broken this; I think I succeeded after upgrading yum, but I can't be sure. Here's the spewage. Pungi:ERROR:

Re: Error from repoview when composing with pungi.

2009-02-18 Thread seth vidal
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 14:35 -0700, William F. Acker WB2FLW +1 303 722 7209 wrote: I back leveled sqlite on the build machine which didn't help. I know that's not conclusive since some packages such as Anaconda are downloaded from the repo and never cached. So, before putting the old

Re: Error from repoview when composing with pungi.

2009-02-18 Thread seth vidal
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 16:43 -0500, seth vidal wrote: On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 14:35 -0700, William F. Acker WB2FLW +1 303 722 7209 wrote: I back leveled sqlite on the build machine which didn't help. I know that's not conclusive since some packages such as Anaconda are downloaded

[Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 483589] terminus-font-x11 partially unusable on F-10

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483589 Hans Ulrich Niedermann rhb...@n-dimensional.de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477481] [wastesedge] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 --- Comment #12 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@no-log.org 2009-02-18 04:54:09 EDT --- I'm wondering something: I remove the

[Bug 444281] Provides: freetype2-devel

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444281 --- Comment #2 from Ed Avis e...@membled.com 2009-02-18 08:15:12 EDT --- This is still the case in Fedora 10. --

[Bug 477481] [wastesedge] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 --- Comment #13 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-02-18 10:08:12 EDT --- Yep. You need to make a modified

rpms/libXfont/devel .cvsignore, 1.16, 1.17 import.log, 1.1, 1.2 libXfont.spec, 1.42, 1.43 sources, 1.17, 1.18 libXfont-1.3.1-fast-retry.patch, 1.1, NONE libXfont-1.3.1-visibility.patch, 1.1, NONE libX

2009-02-18 Thread Adam Jackson
Author: ajax Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libXfont/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19423/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore import.log libXfont.spec sources Removed Files: libXfont-1.3.1-fast-retry.patch libXfont-1.3.1-visibility.patch

[Bug 477368] [a2ps] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477368 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:31:52 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477372] [childsplay] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477372 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:31:55 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477371] [cave9] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:31:53 EDT --- This is a reminder for all

[Bug 477046] [filesystem] Please drop fonts-related directories from filesystem

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477046 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:31:41 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477375] [denemo] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477375 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:31:58 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477331] [asana-math-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477331 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:31:45 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477334] [darkgarden-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477334 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:31:48 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477054] [fontconfig] Rebuild against fontpackages-devel depending on fontpackages-filesystem

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477054 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:31:44 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 480455] [ftgl] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480455 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:21 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 480454] [freedink] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480454 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:20 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 480457] [gramps] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480457 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:21 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 480469] [plplot] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480469 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:29 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 480453] [foobillard] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480453 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:18 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 480461] [mapnik] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480461 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:24 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 480473] [slingshot] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480473 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:31 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 480459] [libprojectM] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480459 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:23 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477404] [k3d] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477404 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:18 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 480445] [cinepaint] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480445 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:12 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 480462] [mapserver] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480462 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:26 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 480446] [e16] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480446 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:13 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477394] [groff] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477394 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:11 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477464] [TeXmacs] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477464 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:54 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 481423] [OpenJDK] Adapt to F11 fonts packaging changes

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481423 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:35 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477471] [tuxpaint] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477471 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:57 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 480470] [publican] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480470 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:30 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 480467] [perl-PDF-API2] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480467 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:27 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477487] [xpilot-ng] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477487 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:09 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477444] [pygame] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477444 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:45 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477382] [enscript] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477382 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:01 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477483] [widelands] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477483 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:07 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477424] [meanwhile] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477424 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:34 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 480477] [vdr-skins] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480477 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:31 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477450] [rosegarden4] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477450 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:50 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477442] [poker2d] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477442 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:43 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 480447] [e16-docs] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480447 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:14 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477386] [flumotion] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477386 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:06 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477473] [tvtime] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:00 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 480452] [fillets-ng-data] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480452 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:18 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 480468] [php-ZendFramework] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480468 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:28 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477413] [liblo] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477413 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:24 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477378] [e16-themes] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477378 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:00 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477419] [lklug-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477419 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:29 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477421] [madan-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477421 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:30 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477390] [glob2] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477390 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:10 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477463] [texlive-texmf] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477463 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:53 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477405] [kacst-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477405 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:18 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477443] [poker3d-data] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477443 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:44 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477474] [un-core-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477474 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:01 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477393] [GraphicsMagick] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477393 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:10 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477436] [padauk-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:39 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477423] mathml-fonts: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477423 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:33 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477403] [jomolhari-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477403 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:16 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477459] [sportrop-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477459 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:52 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477409] koffice: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477409 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:21 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477401] [inconsolata-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477401 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:14 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477398] [icelandic-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477398 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:13 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477389] [ghostscript-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477389 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:09 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477416] [lilypond] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #28 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:25 EDT --- This is a reminder for all

[Bug 477486] [xorg-x11-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477486 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:08 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477395] [hanazono-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477395 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:12 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477446] [python-reportlab] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477446 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:47 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477481] [wastesedge] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:05 EDT --- This is a reminder for all

[Bug 477488] [xplanet] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477488 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:10 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477437] [paktype-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477437 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:41 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477445] [python-matplotlib] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477445 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:46 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:02 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 480482] [terminus] update to new font package naming guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:32 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477422] [mapserver] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477422 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:32 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477466] [thibault-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477466 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:55 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477431] [nethack-vultures] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477431 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:38 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477429] [myanmar3-unicode-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477429 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:37 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477418] [linux-libertine-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:27 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477385] [fillets-ng-data] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477385 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:32:04 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 481494] Renaming review: unikurd-web-font ⇒ kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-02-18 14:33:36 EDT --- This is a reminder for all the

[Bug 477409] koffice: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477409 --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-02-18 14:53:12 EDT --- *** Bug 477407 has been marked as a

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477407, which changed state. Bug 477407 Summary: [koffice] Please convert to new font packaging

[Bug 477407] [koffice] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477407 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 484042] Review Request: vlgothic-fonts - Japanese TrueType fonts

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484042 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-02-18 15:29:13 EDT --- Did you hit the Refresh

[Bug 486221] New: spectemplate-fonts-simple.spec uses non-existing macro %{fontdir}

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: spectemplate-fonts-simple.spec uses non-existing macro %{fontdir} https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486221 Summary: spectemplate-fonts-simple.spec

[Bug 480477] [vdr-skins] Adapt to font package renamings

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480477 --- Comment #6 from Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi 2009-02-18 17:20:31 EDT --- Nicolas, this bug is assigned to you, see

[Bug 477476] [unikurd-web-font] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477476 Bug 477476 depends on bug 481494, which changed state. Bug 481494 Summary: Renaming review: unikurd-web-font ⇒

[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 481494, which changed state. Bug 481494 Summary: Renaming review: unikurd-web-font ⇒

[Bug 481494] Renaming review: unikurd-web-font ⇒ kurdit-unikurd-web-fonts

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481494 Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

  1   2   3   >