Hi all...
I can produce all the materials to fit the Leonidas Lion Theme in the
scheduling for the final release, so we can bring all inside, at least as an
alternative theme, I don't propose nothing for the landscape 'cause after a lot
of test I really don't like my works 'cause it was so
For those willing to reply, add Bill in CC, he is not subscribed to the
list.
Bill DeJohn wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
My name is Bill DeJohn ( Dadster ). I am co-founder of Linux Graphics
Users forum. We have a monthly article where we feature a distros art
team.
Samuele Storari wrote:
Hi guys,
I want to submit a new concept and a new layout for this F11 release, seeing you a little
stuck on the current landscape theme,and I hear a lot of rumors about
Windows-like layout.
I like this, and the people in the office love it. I don't think I would
To be honest, I prefer the theme with the lion to the one with the green
field. The reason I proposed a concept of the theme with a river was
because I didn't want it to resemble with the winxp theme...
Generally, I 'd suggest a bit more discreet design (or placing etc) of
the lion because I
On Monday 30 March 2009 14:46:36 Charlie Brej wrote:
Samuele Storari wrote:
Hi guys,
I want to submit a new concept and a new layout for this F11 release,
seeing you a little stuck on the current landscape theme,and I hear a lot
of rumors about Windows-like layout.
I like this, and
Hi,
- Original Message
From: Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com
We should decide very soon which theme become default one. Current Leonidas
landscape still needs a lot of work - it looks very nice on small screens
(EEE) but on my workstation it lacks details and looks blurry.
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 09:43 -0700, Máirín Duffy wrote:
What do folks think?
I love the lion. Its a great background already. With some polishing, it
can be perfect. Go for it, as far as I'm concerned.
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
� wrote:
Hi,
- Original Message
From: Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com
We should decide very soon which theme become default one. Current Leonidas
landscape still needs a lot of work - it looks very nice on small screens
(EEE) but on my workstation it lacks details
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 15:52 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
The licensing statements for the freebies on the site are kept here:
http://blogspoon.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/freebies/terms-of-use.html
[...]
The part that bothers me about these licensing texts is the statement
of terms
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Would anyone be especially opposed to going with Samuele's Lion idea,
seeing that both Samuele and Charlie have committed to helping out
with it?
Also, some of our splash ideas
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477372
Johan Cwiklinski jo...@x-tnd.be changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044
Bug 477044 depends on bug 477372, which changed state.
Bug 477372 Summary: [childsplay] Please convert to new font packaging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491962
Tim Waugh twa...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492900
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492797
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490364
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418
Bug 477418 depends on bug 490364, which changed state.
Bug 490364 Summary: Package does not build in rawhide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418
--- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-03-30
15:38:29 EDT ---
Also upstream has released a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492900
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491974
Qianqian Fang fan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
I'm sorry guys, but we had a minor problem with the tar.gz on the previous
RPM.
Can I have +1's for a new update on app1 to the 0.5.1-2 building?
http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/plague-results/fedora-5-epel/transifex/0.5.1-2.el5/noarch/
Thanks
--
Diego Búrigo Zacarão
http://diegobz.net
Linux
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Diego Búrigo Zacarão wrote:
I'm sorry guys, but we had a minor problem with the tar.gz on the previous
RPM.
Can I have +1's for a new update on app1 to the 0.5.1-2 building?
http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/plague-results/fedora-5-epel/transifex/0.5.1-2.el5/noarch/
For those not on the announce list:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2009-March/msg00010.html
-Mike
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
Hello,
What about the use of S/Key (one-time passwords) I think it is possible
to deploy SSH with S/Key authentication. I haven't look into it that
much but it could be a possible solution?
susmit shannigrahi wrote:
So I'm not quite sure how to 'fix' this problem. By that I mean, even if
Opps Sorry I didn't check the link Susmit posted.
susmit shannigrahi wrote:
So I'm not quite sure how to 'fix' this problem. By that I mean, even if
we knew this attack was going to happen I'm not totally sure of a feasible
solution, using only free software, that we could have used to fix it.
Xavier Lamien wrote:
2009/3/30 Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Diego Búrigo Zacarão wrote:
I'm sorry guys, but we had a minor problem with the tar.gz on the previous
RPM.
Can I have +1's for a new update on app1 to the 0.5.1-2 building?
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Damian Myerscough wrote:
Hello,
What about the use of S/Key (one-time passwords) I think it is possible to
deploy SSH with S/Key authentication. I haven't look into it that much but it
could be a possible solution?
If someone had my username, password, and ssh key.
I have just done some research on SSH and S/Key and I read that S/Key
cannot withstand a brute forced attack [1]
[1] http://www.gentoo-wiki.info/OpenSSH_skey
Mike McGrath wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Damian Myerscough wrote:
Hello,
What about the use of S/Key (one-time passwords) I think it
If someone had my username, password, and ssh key. How would that prevent
them from getting a otp?
Supposedly, they will not have access to the mobile device/pager where
this single time password will be sent.
--
Regards,
Susmit.
=
ssh
Mike McGrath wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Damian Myerscough wrote:
What about the use of S/Key (one-time passwords) I think it is possible to
deploy SSH with S/Key authentication. I haven't look into it that much but it
could be a possible solution?
If someone had my username, password, and
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
If someone had my username, password, and ssh key. How would that prevent
them from getting a otp?
Supposedly, they will not have access to the mobile device/pager where
this single time password will be sent.
Interestingly I saw someone
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Damian Myerscough
damian.myersco...@gmail.com wrote:
I have just done some research on SSH and S/Key and I read that S/Key cannot
withstand a brute forced attack [1]
[1] http://www.gentoo-wiki.info/OpenSSH_skey
True, but We can lock out an account after 10
Supposedly, they will not have access to the mobile device/pager where
this single time password will be sent.
Interestingly I saw someone doing something very similar to this at pycon
using asterisk.
You mean, pretend to be another number using asterix
and grab this single time passwd?
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Damian Myerscough wrote:
Hello,
What about the use of S/Key (one-time passwords) I think it is possible to
deploy SSH with S/Key authentication. I haven't look into it that much but it
could be a
Damian Myerscough wrote:
I have just done some research on SSH and S/Key and I read that S/Key
cannot withstand a brute forced attack [1]
[1] http://www.gentoo-wiki.info/OpenSSH_skey
OTPW looks better:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OTPW
___
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, susmit shannigrahi wrote:
Supposedly, they will not have access to the mobile device/pager where
this single time password will be sent.
Interestingly I saw someone doing something very similar to this at pycon
using asterisk.
You mean, pretend to be another
So doing a liitle looking around I cane across some options that look
interesting, the following options would mean you need to physically have
something to login.
yubikey
http://www.yubico.com/products/yubikey/
It would require a pam module and for us to setup a server for managing keys.
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:57:23 -0500
From: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
Reply-To: Fedora Infrastructure fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
To: Fedora Infrastructure fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
Subject: More auth options
So doing a liitle looking around I cane across some
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Matthew Galgoci mgalg...@redhat.com wrote:
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:57:23 -0500
From: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
Reply-To: Fedora Infrastructure fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
To: Fedora Infrastructure fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
Subject:
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:57:23 -0500
From: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
Reply-To: Fedora Infrastructure fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
To: Fedora Infrastructure fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
Subject: More auth options
So doing a liitle looking around I cane across some
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
So doing a liitle looking around I cane across some options that look
interesting, the following options would mean you need to physically have
something to login.
yubikey
http://www.yubico.com/products/yubikey/
It
Hello, my name is Ferino Mardo but you can call me Rino. I am a
network professional having been in the industry for more than 18
years. I used to be a coder (from assembler to C) but now working as a
network manager. I don't consider myself a newbie though I also don't
call myself a h4ck3r :-)
ok i found a FIG and it's called sysadmin. i think this is the closest
to my actual experience.
i want to join sysadmin. should i apply now or wait for a nod?
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
ubikey is max USD$25 where the etoken is probably at least USD$30.
I would think that with yubikey we could work out a deal with them
to get a discount in return for us being a case study/prominent user
of there product. all of the software for yubikey AFAICT is open
We're allowing for early branching now.
---
configs/build/update-static-repos.py |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configs/build/update-static-repos.py
b/configs/build/update-static-repos.py
index 16ee6ac..98d48c9 100755
---
On 2009-03-30 08:44:29 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
We're allowing for early branching now.
---
configs/build/update-static-repos.py |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configs/build/update-static-repos.py
b/configs/build/update-static-repos.py
index
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Rino Mardo wrote:
Hello, my name is Ferino Mardo but you can call me Rino. I am a
network professional having been in the industry for more than 18
years. I used to be a coder (from assembler to C) but now working as a
network manager. I don't consider myself a newbie
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Rino Mardo wrote:
ok i found a FIG and it's called sysadmin. i think this is the closest
to my actual experience.
i want to join sysadmin. should i apply now or wait for a nod?
Yep, that's a good one to apply for as any other sysadmin-* groups require
it. Let me know
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
ubikey is max USD$25 where the etoken is probably at least USD$30.
I would think that with yubikey we could work out a deal with them
to get a discount in return for us being a case study/prominent user
of there product.
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 08:56 +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
+* linux-2.6-net-fix-another-gro-bug.patch:
+virtio_net guest-remote GSO busted with 2.6.29 host
+https://bugzilla.redhat.com/490266
+Should be in 2.6.29.1
I took the liberty of just going ahead and
On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 21:38 +, Beartooth wrote:
I've installed Eeebuntu Base to an EeePC 701 and installed Alpine
2.0 (the only mailer I give a shrivelled electron for). I want to add
the .pinerc, and the .addressbook that I've been tweaking since before
AOL or the Web; but nothing I can
Hiisi wrote:
Dear Fedora crowd!
I've a desktop running Fedora 10 connected to the Internet via LAN.
There's 3 network controllers in the desktop. One integrated to the
motherboard and two additional. I would like to connect other
computers
(two laptops, one running fc9 and the other Window$
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Let me see - The Gnupg package is included with Fedora. RPMs are
signed with a GPG key - each version has its own key. The extra
repositories have their own keys. When their was a possibility that
the keys had been compromised, new keys were issued. It is not like
2009/3/29 Leslie Satenstein lsatenst...@yahoo.com:
Error Type: lt;type apos;exceptions.TypeErrorapos;gt;
File : /usr/lib/yum-plugins/rpm-warm-cache.py, line 32, in
postreposetup_hook
Remove yum-rpm-warm-cache, it's broken.
Richard.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To
2009/3/27 Mikkel L. Ellertson mik...@infinity-ltd.com:
Mattias Hellström wrote:
Could you post your /etc/fstab and the output of fdisk -l /dev/sdb?
Are you attempting to mount a partition on the SCSI drive?
Yes, yes.
[r...@amrut ~]# fdisk -l /dev/sdb
Disk /dev/sdb: 73.4 GB, 73407820800
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 10:52 +0400, Hiisi wrote:
Here's what I have now:
I assigned F10 eth1 an address 192.168.2.1/24
and done some additional iptables commands on F10:
iptables -A FORWARD -i eth1 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A FORWARD -o eth1 -j ACCEPT
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING
Also enabled
On Monday 30 March 2009 12:47:49 Tim wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 11:23 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
If you examine my key you will see that it is signed by a number of
people who have properly verified that I am who I say I am. This is
essential for the web of trust to work, but frankly it
Hi Experts,
Below is the dmesg log I am getting when I am connecting USB device(an embedded
board OMAP OSK5912) to my FC9 PC.
.
usb 3-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2
usb 3-1: device descriptor read/64, error -71
usb 3-1: device descriptor
On Monday 30 March 2009 08:28:12 Stanisław T. Findeisen wrote:
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Let me see - The Gnupg package is included with Fedora. RPMs are
signed with a GPG key - each version has its own key. The extra
repositories have their own keys. When their was a possibility that
Hello there,
few sounds after rebooting, sound doesn't play anymore in my Fedora 10,
kept up-to-date using yum. Hardware is a Dell Latitude E6500, featuring,
according to `lspci -vv`:
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) HD Audio
Controller (rev 03)
Subsystem:
Message: 7
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 05:45:26 +0200
From: Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
Subject: Re: Help to sort a multimedia system??? (still)
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Message-ID: gqmqsn$pl...@ger.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
DB wrote:
$ rpm -qa phonon\*
Has anyone gotten this combo to work?
Dell 2950 with stock MD3000 array (not the MD3000i)
MDSM to manage the MD3000
iSCSI Target
All on F10
We're been trying to get this to work for weeks and have been thoroughly
unsuccessful! MDSM doesn't want to run on F10. In fact, it doesn't want
to run on
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 11:23 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
If you examine my key you will see that it is signed by a number of
people who have properly verified that I am who I say I am. This is
essential for the web of trust to work, but frankly it is not
understood by many people, and I've seen
On 03/29/2009 11:29 AM, Steven Stern wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Running named in a chroot, I've been getting these messages for about a
week. Running restorecon, as suggested by the troubleshooter, doesn't help.
Mar 26 05:08:55 sds-desk setroubleshoot: SELinux is
The crontab files are there . I was just looking on the wrong machine.
Sorry for early morning stupidity.
--
===
Eat shit -- billions of flies can't be wrong.
===
In the last week my personal crontab entries have disappeared. Can
someone suggest an answer to why that happened?
--
===
Fats Loves Madelyn.
===
Aaron Konstam
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 22:17 +1030, Tim wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 11:23 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
If you examine my key you will see that it is signed by a number of
people who have properly verified that I am who I say I am. This is
essential for the web of trust to work, but frankly it
On Friday 27 March 2009 19:32:13 James Harrison wrote:
When removing a USB key, I use:
sync ; sync ; umount {/Path/to/USB/key}
Just eject /dev/whatever works well in my experience, and causes e.g. my
phone
to display USB connection ended as well, i.e. equivalent to Safely remove.
--
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 10:00 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
This communication provides additional information on the Fedora
infrastructure intrusion first reported on August 14, 2008. In part
this communication reiterates information provided in previous
announcements.
snip
Thank you for the
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:48:01 +1030
Tim wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 08:55 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
What is wrong with Verisign?
Is that a loaded question, or what?
Directly on point, someone persuaded Verisign to issue genuine Microsoft
Corporation keys to them in 2001.
--
MELVILLE
On Monday 30 March 2009 15:29:55 Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 10:00 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
This communication provides additional information on the Fedora
infrastructure intrusion first reported on August 14, 2008. In part
this communication reiterates information
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 00:48 +1030, Tim wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 08:55 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
What is wrong with Verisign?
Is that a loaded question, or what?
Some have no kind words for the company. Here's a short bit about that:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 08:55:52 -0500,
Aaron Konstam akons...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
What is wrong with Verisign?
Lot's of things. They did spin off some of their evil when they made Network
Solutions a separate entity again, but I am sure there is still plenty of
evil left behind.
--
On Monday 30 March 2009 00:42:44 Kevin Kofler wrote:
Adel ESSAFI wrote:
I try have a FSA and I have uploaded my RSA key since 10 minutes, but I
can't log yet! is there any think missing ?
10 minutes are not enough, you need to wait for the key to be synced from
FAS to the server. This only
Gene Poole wrote:
Robin Laing wrote:
Does the drive showup in the BIOS? Is your powersupply supplying the
correct voltages?
I have seen issues with low powersupply voltages.
--
Robin Laing
There's no problem with the DVD drive. If I boot off of the prior
kernel all is OK.
2009/3/30 Bill Crawford
I'd love to, but I don't seem to have received the message you're replying
to,
nor does
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2009-March/thread.html
(which is a bit odd :o)) ...
I think it was sent to only fedora-announce-list.
--
Paul
--
fedora-list
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 08:24 -0700, Craig White wrote:
http://www.openca.org/
Though that leaves you with a few problems:
Few clients recognise them as an authority. If they want to use them,
users have to figure out how to add their root certificate (if they
can). And that's not just *you*,
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 09:42:03AM -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
Dunno, if Marc is part of the `Gnome' club or is one himself, but does
not add much with his comment.
Yes, my being the only person who correctly pointed out that the problem
is an upstream regression, and something Fedora is
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 09:18:45 -0700,
Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
I agree that you are discussing the present day practical limitations
but the concept of an open certificate authority would seem to defeat
most, if not all of the problems of a corporate certificate
Craig White:
http://www.openca.org/
Tim:
Though that leaves you with a few problems:
Few clients recognise them as an authority ... (and) ... not so
trustworthy trusting
Craig White:
I agree that you are discussing the present day practical limitations
but the concept of an open
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 11:42 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 09:18:45 -0700,
Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
I agree that you are discussing the present day practical limitations
but the concept of an open certificate authority would seem to defeat
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 03/29/2009 11:29 AM, Steven Stern wrote:
Running named in a chroot, I've been getting these messages for about a
week. Running restorecon, as suggested by the troubleshooter, doesn't
help.
Mar 26 05:08:55 sds-desk setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing logrotate
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 09:50:20 -0700,
Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
I'm not sure that I agree with you at all but your being vague. If I
assume that you are talking about the way Firefox handles untrusted
certificates with their alert and requires you to 'get the certificate'
On 03/30/2009 12:54 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 03/29/2009 11:29 AM, Steven Stern wrote:
Running named in a chroot, I've been getting these messages for about a
week. Running restorecon, as suggested by the troubleshooter, doesn't
help.
Mar 26 05:08:55 sds-desk
On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 15:08 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
You will also have to add routes on all the machines. If you have
configured ifcfg-eth0 correctly on the laptops, they will already
have the routes.
I've never had to add routes, just giving my network configurations
network
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 03:21:12 +1030,
Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
Just how many root certificates are software builders willing to add?
As many as contribute funding.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
Tim wrote, On 03/30/2009 12:51 PM:
That sort of decision would be based on popularity (a problem you'd like
to see overcome, and could be overcome, given enough of a push, but
whether we have the numbers is another matter), and whether the
certificate authority is effective enough to support
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:28 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
So I suppose this is some problem related with the v4l2 plugin for
gstreamer, but I don't know how to fix this. I've Googled it and I saw
people from other distributions having the same
fred smith ha scritto:
Downloading OpenMOTIF requires registration, which I'm not especially
interested in doing.
Are you sure!?
ftp://ftp.ics.com/openmotif/2.3/2.3.1/
wgetting now: ftp://ftp.ics.com/openmotif/2.3/2.3.2/openmotif-2.3.2.tar.gz
Anybody know how to get this working on F10?
I'm in my bash book and looking on web but can't seem to resolve this
simple problem.
$ if [ -n grep A121 myfile.csv ]; then echo null; fi
null
$ if [ -n grep A125 myfile.csv ]; then echo null; fi
null
A125 definitely is null when I just run the grep command in the quotes
but A121 definitely is
Craig White wrote:
I'm in my bash book and looking on web but can't seem to resolve this
simple problem.
$ if [ -n grep A121 myfile.csv ]; then echo null; fi
null
$ if [ -n grep A125 myfile.csv ]; then echo null; fi
null
A125 definitely is null when I just run the grep command in the quotes
Craig White wrote:
I'm in my bash book and looking on web but can't seem to resolve this
simple problem.
$ if [ -n grep A121 myfile.csv ]; then echo null; fi
null
$ if [ -n grep A125 myfile.csv ]; then echo null; fi
null
A125 definitely is null when I just run the grep command in the quotes
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 11:33 -0700, Agile Aspect wrote:
Craig White wrote:
I'm in my bash book and looking on web but can't seem to resolve this
simple problem.
$ if [ -n grep A121 myfile.csv ]; then echo null; fi
null
$ if [ -n grep A125 myfile.csv ]; then echo null; fi
null
Craig White wrote:
I'm in my bash book and looking on web but can't seem to resolve this
simple problem.
$ if [ -n grep A121 myfile.csv ]; then echo null; fi
null
$ if [ -n grep A125 myfile.csv ]; then echo null; fi
null
A125 definitely is null when I just run the grep command in the quotes
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 13:33 -0500, Justin Willmert wrote:
Craig White wrote:
I'm in my bash book and looking on web but can't seem to resolve this
simple problem.
$ if [ -n grep A121 myfile.csv ]; then echo null; fi
null
$ if [ -n grep A125 myfile.csv ]; then echo null; fi
null
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 13:42 -0500, Robert Nichols wrote:
Craig White wrote:
I'm in my bash book and looking on web but can't seem to resolve this
simple problem.
$ if [ -n grep A121 myfile.csv ]; then echo null; fi
null
$ if [ -n grep A125 myfile.csv ]; then echo null; fi
null
2009/3/30 Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com:
$ if [ -n $(grep A125 ARdebtorsmaster.csv) ]; then echo null; fi
null
$ if [ -n $(grep A121 ARdebtorsmaster.csv) ]; then echo null; fi
bash: [: too many arguments
and then of course, light bulb goes off...I have to figure out how to
get a basic
Craig White wrote, at 03/31/2009 03:27 AM +9:00:
I'm in my bash book and looking on web but can't seem to resolve this
simple problem.
$ if [ -n grep A121 myfile.csv ]; then echo null; fi
null
$ if [ -n grep A125 myfile.csv ]; then echo null; fi
null
A125 definitely is null when I
2009/3/30 Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com:
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 13:42 -0500, Robert Nichols wrote:
Craig White wrote:
I'm in my bash book and looking on web but can't seem to resolve this
simple problem.
$ if [ -n grep A121 myfile.csv ]; then echo null; fi
null
$ if [ -n grep
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 19:57 +0100, Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
2009/3/30 Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com:
$ if [ -n $(grep A125 ARdebtorsmaster.csv) ]; then echo null; fi
null
$ if [ -n $(grep A121 ARdebtorsmaster.csv) ]; then echo null; fi
bash: [: too many arguments
and then of course,
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
