On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 04:07:33PM -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
>I am still running F-10, I will wait until things settle down to
>try F-11 otherwise I burn up a lot of bandwidth doing updates
>over and over. I have a satellite system for my internet
>connection and I
Hi All,
Have just upgraded from F10 to F11, it all seemed to go well. However, I
am having trouble with yum as it is not fetching info from livna or
RPMfusion.
I tried to have a look at my repolist but got this error message:
yum repolist
Loaded plugins: dellsysidplugin2, presto, protect-packag
Partha wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 04:07:33PM -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
I am still running F-10, I will wait until things settle down to
try F-11 otherwise I burn up a lot of bandwidth doing updates
over and over. I have a satellite system for my internet
connec
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 07:56 -0700, Jason Ish wrote:
> Did not installing swap from the beginning cause an issue here? I
> ask, b/c suspend and hibernate just worked on this laptop with F9 and
> F10.
Possibly...
Prior behaviour (and probably still current), is that the initrd file
created when in
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:06:32 +1000, Anthony wrote:
> Hi All,
> Have just upgraded from F10 to F11, it all seemed to go well. However, I
> am having trouble with yum as it is not fetching info from livna or
> RPMfusion.
> I tried to have a look at my repolist but got this error message:
> yum rep
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 22:57 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> With the Firefox that was included in F10, when I clicked on a link in
> my email client that link would open in a new tab in Firefox.
That sort of thing's always been a "tabs" preference in the Firefox
program, itself. See how yours are set u
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 00:31 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I don't think that is correct. If you move a file within the same file
> system or you copy using the appropiate preserve option then you
> should get the original context (assuming selinux doesn't block this).
> Otherwise the context depe
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Tim wrote:
>> Surely not... If you copy a file to a standard location, it should get
>> set the proper contexts, during the copy.
>
> That's not how SELinux works. It'll copy the context from the original
> location. You need to explicitly rel
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
> Mark Simonson (http://www.marksimonson.com/) has posted a
> freely-distributable fixed-width font I'd like to try out as a
> programmers font. It comes as a TrueType font. Up to now, I've just
> worked with the fonts provided with the distribution
Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Jason Ish mailto:i...@unx.ca>> wrote:
I'm hoping I just missed something here. I recently installed F11
on my Lenovo X61 laptop without a swap partition, I've since added
one (and set it up in /etc/fstab) as I'd like hibernate
Gregory Machin wrote:
Hi
I have a Huawei device that I have been using on fc 8 and fc 10. But
now with fc 11 it does not work.
Here is the log file entries for the device.
Jun 13 15:42:25 localhost kernel: usb 3-2: USB disconnect, address 26
Jun 13 15:42:25 localhost kernel: usb 3-2: new full s
Craig White wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 12:27 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>>
>> Maybe try one thing?
>>
>> Just for a test, create a new user and test with that to see if there is
>> a difference.
>>
>
> yes a difference...new user does not have the problem so maybe it is
> related t
Hi friends,
I have installed Fedora 11 x86_64 on my laptop.
But adobe flash-player don't work on 64 bit platform.
It gives error
ERROR: Your architecture, \'x86_64\', is not supported by the
Adobe Flash Player installer.
I could not find out the x86_64 version of flash player. Is it avail
Hi,
read this:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Flash
Peter
2009-06-14 12:30 keltezéssel, Digvijay Patankar írta:
Hi friends,
I have installed Fedora 11 x86_64 on my laptop.
But adobe flash-player don't work on 64 bit platform.
It gives error
ERROR: Your architecture, \'x86_64\', is not support
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Digvijay Patankar <
digvijay_patan...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi friends,
> I have installed Fedora 11 x86_64 on my laptop.
> But adobe flash-player don't work on 64 bit platform.
> It gives error
>
> ERROR: Your architecture, \'x86_64\', is not supported by the
>
On 14.06.2009 10:15, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:06:32 +1000, Anthony wrote:
>
>> Have just upgraded from F10 to F11, it all seemed to go well. However, I
>> am having trouble with yum as it is not fetching info from livna or
>> RPMfusion.
>> I tried to have a look at my rep
Hi,
I didn't see the posting that I sent to the list yesterday show up so
another posting to test. Apologies for the noise.
Regards,
Patrick
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.or
Hi,
Did a clean install of F11 x86_64. When the laptop boots I noticed that
there was quite a delay for gdm to startup. Also when I press enter to
select the default user it lasts at least 5 seconds for the password
line to appear. I noticed this message in /var/log/messages:
Jun 12 13:20:04 luna
On 14/06/09 12:12, Patrick wrote:
Hi,
I didn't see the posting that I sent to the list yesterday show up so
another posting to test. Apologies for the noise.
Regards,
Patrick
If your on Gmail it wont.
Best place to check is:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/
Frank
--
fedora-list
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Jason
Dickerson wrote:
> I have an IBM Thinkpad X30 that I upgraded from FC10 to FC11. It has an
> Intel i830 Integrated Graphics Chipset. Everything worked fine on FC10 with
> XAA acceleration and DRI. After the upgrade, I am getting UXA Acceleration
> with DRI2
Around 06:19am on Sunday, June 14, 2009 (UK time), Mike Dwiggins scrawled:
> I need to be able to log in as root to do my job! I wish it were not so
> but, it is! Life always fair!
What does logging in as root give you that can't be achieved by logging
in as yourself and using su?
Steve
--
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 01:42:53 -0400
Todd Zullinger wrote:
There's some truly awful advice in this thread, aside from Robert
Cochran's :-(
> Mike Dwiggins wrote:
> > Some of us are causal users who wander in from the Windows world! I
> > wish I could live in Linux but, that ain't gonna happen!
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 22:45:28 -0400
Todd Zullinger wrote:
> There was also a post on fedora-devel from the bind maintainer just a
> few days ago regarding this issue:
>
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-June/msg00683.html
>
> From that thread:
>
>As the man suggested it would
Hi all,
there have been a lot (well over 100 during the 1st 12 hours) of
dbusd-related SELinux denials after upgrading my x86_64 system from F10
to F11. In F10 and earlier SELinux problems were usually caused by
various fail2ban operations but now these denials - probably due to
updated fail2ban i
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 17:43 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 12:27 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Maybe try one thing?
> >>
> >> Just for a test, create a new user and test with that to see if there is
> >> a difference.
> >>
> >
> > yes a
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 12:34 +0200, Major Péter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> read this:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Flash
>
> Peter
>
> 2009-06-14 12:30 keltezéssel, Digvijay Patankar írta:
> > Hi friends,
> > I have installed Fedora 11 x86_64 on my laptop.
> > But adobe flash-player don't work on 64 bi
Mike Cloaked wrote:
fedora list wrote:
Install Doc 2.4.2.2
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/install-guide/f11/en-US/html/ch02s04s02s02.html
I followed this install method today on a Dell Latitude 610 and it was
fast
and flawless with one exception.
The usbdrive must be unmounted to write the im
Konstantin Svist wrote:
Frank Elsner wrote:
Make a seperate /boot an ext3 and all the other ext4.
By the way, why ext3 and not ext2? I thought ext2 was lighter, and since
/boot is usually used in read-only mode, stuff like journaling doesn't
matter
Agree, but it really doesn't make a lot
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:35:47 +0200, Thorsten wrote:
> > Livna has discontinued its service long ago
>
> Not really true, as I'd call this
>
> > and only provides a single package in its repos.
>
> as service ;-)
Splitting-hairs.
> > There is no Fedora 11 repo at Livna yet.
>
> That's untrue
I'm seeing things that work fine under Fedora 10 not work under Fedora 11.
Here is the latest example.
If connected via vnc, I can run nmapfe as a regular user, but get the
limitation message about being non-root.
If I use su and then run the program the following occurs.
No protocol specified
I have gotten into the habit of installing from Live CD, since I want to verify
that my hardware is still supported by the current release. It seems that if you
do that the following happens:
- the install starts
- the hostname screen appears with the correct hostname obtained from DHCP
- the sy
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
If you downloaded the DVD image and want to install it from the USB key
without burning it, read
http://wtogami.livejournal.com/30245.html
Very nice. What would it take to make it work with older ISO images, even
non-Fedora images? For testing I sometimes install SuSE
Chris wrote:
Despite a few useful suggestions to my earlier thread I can't stop
pulseaudio from respawning on F11. Does anyone know how to stop it?
I've searched /etc/event.d and /etc/init.d and can't see how it's
started or why it insists on respawning.
The reason I want to do this is that I ha
I upgraded to F11 a few days ago one of my servers and I have problems
with the account module of trac. It give me internal errors when
trying to login:
Trac[main] WARNING: HTTPInternalError: 500 Trac Error (Authentication
information not available. Please refer to the installation documentation.)
Michael Fleming wrote:
> - NEVER ssh as root. PermitRootLogin defaults to "no" in OpenSSH for
> good reason. If your root password is weak and an attacker guesses
> it, it's game over, your machine is compromised and you're another
> zombie in someone's botnet. Log in as a regular user and su
On 14.06.2009 15:15, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:35:47 +0200, Thorsten wrote:
>
>>> Livna has discontinued its service long ago
>> Not really true, as I'd call this
>>
>>> and only provides a single package in its repos.
>> as service ;-)
> Splitting-hairs.
Well, I added a sm
Is there some trick I've missed to tell NetworkManager to try one connection
first, and failover to another, but not to bring up both connections at the same
time. Doing that manually is just one more step required.
Use cases:
- don't bring up wireless if the cable connect is available
- use th
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 09:36:05 -0400
Bill Davidsen wrote:
> yum erase PulseAudio
I did that, and while it works fine for me, I noticed that
gnome-bluetooth depends on pulseaudio, so it takes
gnome-bluetooth with it. I can see a pulseaudio plugin
needing bluetooth, but I have no idea why you would
n
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 09:39:59 -0400
Todd Zullinger wrote:
> A minor nit, but root login is allowed by default in upstream OpenSSH
> (and in the Fedora packages). I disable that on my systems, which I
> think it a good practice.
I use the nifty (relatively) new "Match" sshd_config stuff to disable
Robert L Cochran wrote:
I need to mount an SCO OpenServer 5 (HTFS) disk on Fedora 11. I think I
can image the source hard drive to a USB flash drive and then just plug
the drive into my Fedora 11 laptop. Will Fedora 11 mount the OpenServer
partitions automatically, or do I need to enable this a
Tom Horsley wrote:
> Why not just *always* run bind chroot?
I'm guessing it's because, in general, Fedora is moving away from
chroot and toward SELinux to provide extra security for these sorts of
services?
> Have the files live in /var/named, then updates just update the one
> and only copy in /
Frank Cox wrote:
With the Firefox that was included in F10, when I clicked on a link in my email
client that link would open in a new tab in Firefox.
With F11, the link opens in the currently-open tab in Firefox, replacing the
content that I had there previously.
The same thing happens when, fo
On 06/12/2009 08:08 PM, Chris wrote:
> Despite a few useful suggestions to my earlier thread I can't stop
> pulseaudio from respawning on F11. Does anyone know how to stop it?
> I've searched /etc/event.d and /etc/init.d and can't see how it's
> started or why it insists on respawning.
>
> The rea
El 14 de junio de 2009 10:36, Martín Marqués escribió:
> I upgraded to F11 a few days ago one of my servers and I have problems
> with the account module of trac. It give me internal errors when
> trying to login:
>
> Trac[main] WARNING: HTTPInternalError: 500 Trac Error (Authentication
> informati
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 15:40:46 +0200, Thorsten wrote:
> >> Note that
> >> http://rpm.livna.org/fedora/
> >> is old, outdated and unmainted
> >
> > That's bad and misleading, too.
>
> And your suggestion is what? Remove all the old stuff? I guess the users
> on old and outdated releases won't like
I'm not expecting this to be fixed by anyone reading this, but just
pointing it out to save others the work of tracking it down. Google
Desktop does not index mail in Thunderbird 3 beta 2.
--
Steve
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mail
El 14 de junio de 2009 11:03, Martín Marqués escribió:
> El 14 de junio de 2009 10:36, Martín Marqués
> escribió:
>> I upgraded to F11 a few days ago one of my servers and I have problems
>> with the account module of trac. It give me internal errors when
>> trying to login:
>>
>> Trac[main] WARNI
Crash bug (#499139) seems to be open since a long time without any
reaction and a new release (0.11) is out since May 31. Someone have news
about this ?
Thanks
Eric
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
Once upon a time, Tim said:
> On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 12:41 +0100, Steve Searle wrote:
> > What does logging in as root give you that can't be achieved by
> > logging in as yourself and using su?
>
> I imagine the common problem being using a menu to fire off the things
> you want to configure.
Ev
Around 03:27pm on Sunday, June 14, 2009 (UK time), Tim scrawled:
> On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 12:41 +0100, Steve Searle wrote:
> > What does logging in as root give you that can't be achieved by
> > logging in as yourself and using su?
>
> I imagine the common problem being using a menu to fire off th
On 06/14/2009 09:51 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Robert L Cochran wrote:
I need to mount an SCO OpenServer 5 (HTFS) disk on Fedora 11. I think
I can image the source hard drive to a USB flash drive and then just
plug the drive into my Fedora 11 laptop. Will Fedora 11 mount the
OpenServer partiti
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 12:41 +0100, Steve Searle wrote:
> What does logging in as root give you that can't be achieved by
> logging in as yourself and using su?
I imagine the common problem being using a menu to fire off the things
you want to configure.
--
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.24-7
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:15:35 +0200,
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:06:32 +1000, Anthony wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> > Have just upgraded from F10 to F11, it all seemed to go well. However, I
> > am having trouble with yum as it is not fetching info from livna or
> > RPMfusion
No need to send a copy to me directly. I'm subscribed here.
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 09:49:41 -0500, Bruno wrote:
> Looking in http://rpm.livna.org/repo I see:
That's not the same than the previous location
( http://rpm.livna.org/fedora ) which users may have
used as baseurls in their .repo files or
The music hasn't stopped, so I don't think this is serious...
Jun 14 10:10:55 sds-desk pulseaudio[2385]: alsa-sink.c: Increasing
wakeup watermark to 30.00 ms
Jun 14 10:10:55 sds-desk pulseaudio[2385]: alsa-sink.c: ALSA woke us up
to write new data to the device, but there was actually nothing t
Tim:
>> I imagine the common problem being using a menu to fire off the things
>> you want to configure.
Steve Searle:
> Point taken, although I would have assumed it would be done from the
> command line.
Though they'd hardly need to log in graphically as root to do command
line work. Two big
Tim:
>> I imagine the common problem being using a menu to fire off the
>> things you want to configure.
Chris Adams:
> Everything that requires root access to configure should be prompting
> for it. If you find something that isn't, that's a bug and should be
> filed.
By and large, that sort of
I'm getting popup window, where is told, that I have 4 updates
GeoIP-1.4.6-2.fc10
ppl-0.10.2-1.fc10
crda-1.0.1_2009.04.16-10.fc10
libkate-0.3.3-1.fc10
I've updated my system from fc10 to fc11 couple of days ago.
When I accept update, I don't get them. Should I need them?
They are for fc10. H
On 06/14/2009 10:17 PM, jarmo wrote:
> I'm getting popup window, where is told, that I have 4 updates
>
> GeoIP-1.4.6-2.fc10
> ppl-0.10.2-1.fc10
> crda-1.0.1_2009.04.16-10.fc10
> libkate-0.3.3-1.fc10
>
> I've updated my system from fc10 to fc11 couple of days ago.
>
> When I accept update, I
On sunnuntai 14 kesäkuu 2009 19:52:10 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> # yum repolist
>
> and
>
> # yum update
>
> Let us know the output
>
> Rahul
yum repolist
Loaded plugins: dellsysidplugin2, refresh-packagekit
repo id repo name
status
adobe-lin
On 06/14/2009 10:52 PM, jarmo wrote:
>
> It is obvious, that they can't be found from fc11 repo's, 'cause they
> are for fc10. Why do fc11 need them?
Seems you have packages left over from the upgrade
# package-cleanup --dupes
If you have dupes, run
# package-cleanup --cleandupes
Then do,
On 06/14/2009 07:51 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> administration.
>
> Why not just *always* run bind chroot?
If someone installs bind-chroot - then yes obviously.
> Have the files live in /var/named,
No. If bind-chroot is installed then all files should live under the
chroot.
If non-chroot'e
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 17:43 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 12:27 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Maybe try one thing?
> >>
> >> Just for a test, create a new user and test with that to see if there is
> >> a difference.
> >>
> >
> > yes a
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 09:52 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Tom Horsley wrote:
> > Why not just *always* run bind chroot?
>
> I'm guessing it's because, in general, Fedora is moving away from
> chroot and toward SELinux to provide extra security for these sorts of
> services?
>
> > Have the files
2009/6/14 Rahul Sundaram :
>
> # yum list installed | grep fc10
>
> remove them manually if needed
Carefull. Rahul said "if needed". Some packages in F11 are named fc10,
asw they are packages that haven't changed and so version name hasn't
changed as well.
Just so you don't end up removeing packa
On 06/14/2009 11:35 PM, Martín Marqués wrote:
> 2009/6/14 Rahul Sundaram
>>
>> # yum list installed | grep fc10
>>
>> remove them manually if needed
>
> Carefull. Rahul said "if needed". Some packages in F11 are named fc10,
> asw they are packages that haven't changed and so version name hasn't
>
Not quite. You want to -c against the small CHECKSUM file, which contains
a list of ISOs and their sha256sums. For example:
$ sha256sum -c Fedora-11-i386-CHECKSUM
I don't get it! you want me to match a downloadable checksum text file to what?
how do i get the numbers from the iso file to check
2009/6/14 Rahul Sundaram :
> On 06/14/2009 11:35 PM, Martín Marqués wrote:
>> 2009/6/14 Rahul Sundaram
>>>
>>> # yum list installed | grep fc10
>>>
>>> remove them manually if needed
>>
>> Carefull. Rahul said "if needed". Some packages in F11 are named fc10,
>> asw they are packages that haven't c
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 19:22 -0700, gmspro wrote:
> --- On Sat, 6/6/09, Mail Lists wrote:
>
> > From: Mail Lists
> > Subject: Re: Questions with rsync
> > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora."
> >
> > Cc: "GMS S"
> > Date: Saturday, June 6, 2009, 6:18 AM
> > O
2009/6/14 Sharpe, Sam J :
> 2009/6/14 Rahul Sundaram :
>> On 06/14/2009 11:35 PM, Martín Marqués wrote:
>>> 2009/6/14 Rahul Sundaram
# yum list installed | grep fc10
remove them manually if needed
>>>
>>> Carefull. Rahul said "if needed". Some packages in F11 are named fc10,
>>>
On 06/14/2009 11:51 PM, Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
> Where is the F11 version of unique - I don't see it...
# rpm -q unique
unique-1.0.4-4.fc11.i586
> Also, what about these?
>
> [...@samlap ~]$ sudo yum list | grep fc10
I don't have time to check on every one of them for you but look up in
http://k
2009/6/14 Rahul Sundaram :
> On 06/14/2009 11:51 PM, Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
>
>> Where is the F11 version of unique - I don't see it...
>
> # rpm -q unique
> unique-1.0.4-4.fc11.i586
>
>> Also, what about these?
>>
>> [...@samlap ~]$ sudo yum list | grep fc10
>
> I don't have time to check on every o
On 06/15/2009 12:06 AM, Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
> So, the outcome is that there are genuine packages in F11 that are
> tagged as fc10 - I can check more cases if you are still not sure.
I am sure there are but the examples you gave out earlier weren't valid.
That's all.
Rahul
--
fedora-list maili
2009/6/14 Rahul Sundaram :
> On 06/15/2009 12:06 AM, Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
>
>> So, the outcome is that there are genuine packages in F11 that are
>> tagged as fc10 - I can check more cases if you are still not sure.
>
> I am sure there are but the examples you gave out earlier weren't valid.
> That
On 09-06-14 09:50:23, Tom Horsley wrote:
>I use the nifty (relatively) new "Match" sshd_config stuff to disable
>root login (and any kind of simple password login for that matter)
>from IP addresses outside my local network, so I can still ssh as root
>easily inside my firewall, but if I'm coming
On 06/15/2009 12:09 AM, Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
> 2009/6/14 Rahul Sundaram :
>> On 06/15/2009 12:06 AM, Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
>>
>>> So, the outcome is that there are genuine packages in F11 that are
>>> tagged as fc10 - I can check more cases if you are still not sure.
>>
>> I am sure there are but th
2009/6/14 Rahul Sundaram :
> On 06/15/2009 12:09 AM, Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
>> 2009/6/14 Rahul Sundaram :
>>> On 06/15/2009 12:06 AM, Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
>>>
So, the outcome is that there are genuine packages in F11 that are
tagged as fc10 - I can check more cases if you are still not sure
Hi,
I just upgraded from Fedora 8 -> 9 -> 10.
Most everything is working or even improved, except for a
puzzling mailer bug. All my incoming mail has the the line:
"BAD MSG:" inserted before body of the message.
I sent a message to my offsite mail server that looks like this:
On 14.06.2009 17:19, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 09:49:41 -0500, Bruno wrote:
>
>> Looking in http://rpm.livna.org/repo I see:
> That's not the same than the previous location
> ( http://rpm.livna.org/fedora ) which users may have
> used as baseurls in their .repo files or in boo
Dennis Gilmore Wrote:
> rpm -qa --qf="%{name}\n"
Thank you! :)
Scott
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Around 07:20pm on Sunday, June 14, 2009 (UK time), terry scrawled:
> Not quite. You want to -c against the small CHECKSUM file, which contains
> a list of ISOs and their sha256sums. For example:
> $ sha256sum -c Fedora-11-i386-CHECKSUM
>
>
> I don't get it! you want me to match a downloadable che
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 19:36:13 +0100,
"Sharpe, Sam J" wrote:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=55464
>
> Note that the version of all the msv packages is in F11 is
> 2-0.2.20050722.3.4.fc10 - because it's tagged as in f11-final. This is
> probably because the build of
How does one compose a reply to a message inside digest mode? Point me
to instruction or supply instructions, please.
thank you
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communi
Fernando Cassia Wrote:
[]
> :-P Have fun running two copies of the gecko engine to have FF and
> Thunderbird open at once...
See Rahul's reply. And FWIW, I have 8GB of RAM. :)
> I just find Evolution slow and bloated. The fact that it´s part of the
> Gnome project means nothing.
I agree.
Around 09:48pm on Sunday, June 14, 2009 (UK time), terry scrawled:
> How does one compose a reply to a message inside digest mode? Point me
> to instruction or supply instructions, please.
You can't re-join it to its original thread, so jsut do the best
possible.
Change the subject back to the
After upgrading to F11 the Alps touchpad moves the pointer very slowly. For F10
I had to enable SHMConfig, for which I had a config file in /etc/hal/fdi/policy
which contained
True
But this no longer does the trick apparently. Oh, and the pointer moves nice as
expected while at
Kevin Kofler Wrote:
> homb...@tips-q.com wrote:
>> Kate seems to have disappeared from KDE4.
>
> Kate is now part of kdesdk.
>
> Kevin Kofler
And it's very annoying.
All I want is Kate, I don't want the other apps in kdesdk.
It's not that I don't have the space for them. It's just the
Kevin Kempter Wrote:
> Kate comes with the kdesdk package
> "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd";> name="qrichtext" content="1" />p, li {
> white-space: pre-wrap; }On Thursday
> 11 June 2009 22:55:20 Ed Greshko wrote: > homb...@tips-q.com
> wrote:
> > > Kate seems to have disappeared fr
Hi all,
I got an error message after running preupgrade and rebooting:
"Unable to read package metadata. This may be due to a missing repodate
directory. Please ensure that your install tree has been correctly
generated."
Anyone know what is going on here?
Thanks.
-
Colin Brace
Ams
El 14 de junio de 2009 15:06, Rahul
Sundaram escribió:
> On 06/14/2009 11:35 PM, Martín Marqués wrote:
>> 2009/6/14 Rahul Sundaram
>>>
>>> # yum list installed | grep fc10
>>>
>>> remove them manually if needed
>>
>> Carefull. Rahul said "if needed". Some packages in F11 are named fc10,
>> asw they
2009/6/14 Sharpe, Sam J :
>
> To answer my own question, if you've pre-upgraded from a recent F10 to
> F11, you will still have the fc10 version of unique as it's a higher
> version (1.2-8) than the version shipped with F11 (1.2-7). I guess as
> versions move on, that will sort itself out.
Can som
Hi,
I have installed Fedora 11 on my sisters laptop with this webcam:
Bus 002 Device 002: ID 0c45:62c0 Microdia Sonix USB 2.0 Camera
Laptop is MSI MS-1221 (PR200):
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LaptopTestingTeam/MSIPR200
It worked on Ubuntu 8.04 with System76 drivers package, but now on
Fedora 11 it do
2009/6/14 Martín Marqués :
> 2009/6/14 Sharpe, Sam J :
>>
>> To answer my own question, if you've pre-upgraded from a recent F10 to
>> F11, you will still have the fc10 version of unique as it's a higher
>> version (1.2-8) than the version shipped with F11 (1.2-7). I guess as
>> versions move on, t
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Jason
Dickerson wrote:
> I have an IBM Thinkpad X30 that I upgraded from FC10 to FC11. It has an
> Intel i830 Integrated Graphics Chipset. Everything worked fine on FC10 with
> XAA acceleration and DRI. After the upgrade, I am getting UXA Acceleration
> with DRI2
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 21:55 +0100, Steve Searle wrote:
> Around 09:48pm on Sunday, June 14, 2009 (UK time), terry scrawled:
>
> > How does one compose a reply to a message inside digest mode? Point me
> > to instruction or supply instructions, please.
>
> You can't re-join it to its original th
Hi all,
I recently installed F11 over F10 on my Eee PC 1000HE (dual-booting with
Windows). The trackpad supports multi-touch including tapping with two and
three fingers. In F10, tapping with two fingers was a middle-button click
and three was a right button tap. In F11, the meanings of the tap
You could try to start with the kernel-parameter "nomodeset", and use
EXA or XAA.
>From what I've seen UXA is always used when kms is active, no matter
what is set in xorg.
- Clemens
PS: I guess the intel-driver guys would be happy about a bug report
(although it won't change anything).
--
fedo
On 06/14/2009 02:19 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Why don't you try reading the manual? Most of the questions you're
> asking here are clearly documented if you only take the trouble to
> check. Sure, some stuff is not adequately documented and some docs may
> even have errors, but asking if rs
On 06/14/2009 02:51 PM, Rick Walker wrote:
> BAD MSG:
Could it be your .procmailrc or some anti-spam filter gone awry ?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/
I cannot install Fedora 11 on my home system. The rewritten anaconda
storage code is bombing out with mysterious errors about file
descriptors and select.
I thought that I could install it as a KVM guest and then "V2P" it, but
I have failed in my attempts to install Fedora 11 as a KVM guest on
Fe
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
