On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 22:36 -0400, gil...@altern.org wrote:
> Somebody has enough confidence in filling bugs to fill this one? I
> find bugzilla is a nightmare.
You really need to fill in bugzilla yourself, because unless you provide
them with the answer at the same time, or they're able to reprod
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 13:11 -0400, linux guy wrote:
> if I do a cd /boot from the chroot session, it shows a blank
> directory. However, if I cd to /media/-/boot, its definitely not
> empty.
>
> I think I need to link the /boot directory to /media/-/boot and then
> to an rpm -i against the F12 k
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:29:06 -0700
stan wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:11:52 +0200
> Peter Diercks wrote:
>
> > Hello List!
> >
> > I am running Fedora 9 on a remote dedicated server leased from a
> > service provider. Access is through SSH. It is a LAMP server with
> > moodle (an educational
> So Ill ask, is there either a way to get this pos working, or is there
> any way to just turn it off so it wont bother me?
>
Like many others I had troubles with pulseaudio so I understand.
I skipped from F9 to F11 so I'm not sure about the F10 specifics, but as
of F9 I came up with the fol
2009/7/16 w bugar :
> I know that fresh install is the recommended path but getting all the mplayer
> deps installed is just too painfull to go thru again, if I can help it.
I can't help you with your other problem, but as for the mplayer and
its deps just follow this.
http://www.mjmwired.net/re
> On 07/16/2009 10:40 PM, gil...@altern.org wrote:
> What you're missing is that the codecs are required for the player to
> load and play the media. The codecs are not required to read the
> contents of the CD.
I see. You're teaching me a lot here. I always thought that, when you
install the mp
Hello list,
I was trying to upgrade from f10 to f11 (from DVD) but am getting a
"insufficient disk space" message after the "preparing transaction" step gets
to 90%. I have a 10G disk with df showing 1.9G avail.
Any way to get the upgrade to finish?
Is 10G now too small?
I think the disk just
On 07/16/2009 10:40 PM, gil...@altern.org wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 22:26 -0400, gil...@altern.org wrote:
Why is it that, when I insert an audio disk, I see it as an audio disk
on
my desktop, but when I click it, GNOME shows the .wav files that are
present. No application is suggested, even u
On 09-07-16 18:59:02, Ed Landaveri wrote:
...
> The reason your directory listing fails is because of iptables.
> Remember vsftp as any ftp server uses incoming port 21 connections
> but not well-known ports outgoing connections. Google and you'll find
> the exact configuration.
He's using PASV
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Reg Clemens wrote:
> I had hoped, that since f10 has been out now for at least 6months, that the
> children that wished pulseaudio on us, would have fixed it so that it would
> work 'out of the box'
>
> Alas, Im sure that they are off breaking something else in Fedo
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 22:26 -0400, gil...@altern.org wrote:
> Why is it that, when I insert an audio disk, I see it as an audio disk on
> my desktop, but when I click it, GNOME shows the .wav files that are
> present. No application is suggested, even under "Open", to play the
> damned music. If I
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Aldo Foot wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Aldo Foot wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Peter Diercks wrote:
>>> Hello List!
>>>
>>> I am running Fedora 9 on a remote dedicated server leased from a service
>>> provider. Access is through SSH. It is
> On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 22:26 -0400, gil...@altern.org wrote:
>> Why is it that, when I insert an audio disk, I see it as an audio disk
>> on
>> my desktop, but when I click it, GNOME shows the .wav files that are
>> present. No application is suggested, even under "Open", to play the
>> damned mus
--- On Thu, 7/16/09, gil...@altern.org wrote:
> From: gil...@altern.org
> Subject: Ranter or evangelist?
> To: fedora-list@redhat.com
> Date: Thursday, July 16, 2009, 7:26 PM
> Why is it that, when I insert an
> audio disk, I see it as an audio disk on
> my desktop, but when I click it, GNOME
> On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 10:04 -0400, gil...@altern.org wrote:
>> peter wrote:
>>
>> > What you could do is install pavucontrol.
>> > Start pavucontrol and select the Configuration tab.
>> > Try to find the correct output device.
>>
>> pavucontrol doesn't work in x86_64. Well, not here. Maybe somebo
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 22:26 -0400, gil...@altern.org wrote:
> Why is it that, when I insert an audio disk, I see it as an audio disk
> on
> my desktop, but when I click it, GNOME shows the .wav files that are
> present. No application is suggested, even under "Open", to play the
> damned music.
Wh
Why is it that, when I insert an audio disk, I see it as an audio disk on
my desktop, but when I click it, GNOME shows the .wav files that are
present. No application is suggested, even under "Open", to play the
damned music. If I go to Application, sound and video, the first option,
"Audio Player"
F-IN-A
/* RANT ON
I can't help but think that all of this policy junk on a default
install of the Linux Operating System is akin to microsoft's
implementation of the standard unix operating philosophy of operating
as a non-root user. If we want to tighten up our security, then we
should ha
G'day all,
I have a s3virge graphics card and Acerview56c monitor. All
looked
fine with FC6 but with F11 there are vertical lines and following the
mouse pointer are some pixels in contrasting colours. The maximum screen
size available through system-config-display is 832x
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 18:38 -0600, Reg Clemens wrote:
> I had hoped, that since f10 has been out now for at least 6months, that the
> children that wished pulseaudio on us, would have fixed it so that it would
> work 'out of the box'
>
> Alas, Im sure that they are off breaking something else in F
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Ed Landaveri wrote:
>> I would advise you NOT to allow WRITE_ENABLE. If your clients are other
>> *.nix clients you only need scp/sftp or psftp on Windows clients. If you
>> have MAC clients they also can
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Aldo Foot wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Peter Diercks wrote:
>> Hello List!
>>
>> I am running Fedora 9 on a remote dedicated server leased from a service
>> provider. Access is through SSH. It is a LAMP server with moodle (an
>> educational cms) as the
I had hoped, that since f10 has been out now for at least 6months, that the
children that wished pulseaudio on us, would have fixed it so that it would
work 'out of the box'
Alas, Im sure that they are off breaking something else in Fedora instead.
I have had had audio working on Redhat/Fedora fo
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Peter Diercks wrote:
> Hello List!
>
> I am running Fedora 9 on a remote dedicated server leased from a service
> provider. Access is through SSH. It is a LAMP server with moodle (an
> educational cms) as the only application. I want to upgrade to Fedora
> 11, and I
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Ed Landaveri wrote:
> I would advise you NOT to allow WRITE_ENABLE. If your clients are other *.nix
> clients you only need scp/sftp or psftp on Windows clients. If you have MAC
> clients they also can use scp. These clients run over ssh that come stardard
> on F
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:11:52 +0200
Peter Diercks wrote:
> Hello List!
>
> I am running Fedora 9 on a remote dedicated server leased from a
> service provider. Access is through SSH. It is a LAMP server with
> moodle (an educational cms) as the only application. I want to
> upgrade to Fedora 11,
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 16:16 -0600, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> I fixed it. The problem had nothing to do with Linux whatsoever. It
> was a bonehead problem caused by me. Someday when I am not mad at
> myself and way behind schedule I'll talk about it.
>
> I re installed kernel kernel-2.6.31-0.69.rc3.f
Hello List!
I am running Fedora 9 on a remote dedicated server leased from a service
provider. Access is through SSH. It is a LAMP server with moodle (an
educational cms) as the only application. I want to upgrade to Fedora
11, and I need some advice as to which method to choose. Should I
- use p
I would advise you NOT to allow WRITE_ENABLE. If your clients are other *.nix
clients you only need scp/sftp or psftp on Windows clients. If you have MAC
clients they also can use scp. These clients run over ssh that come stardard on
Fedora/CentOS/Red Hat boxes. If you have Debian you install th
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 17:04 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 12:04 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > An RC version has been available for at least a couple of weeks:
> >
> > % rpm -q vlc
> > vlc-1.0.0-0.12rc4.fc11.x86_64
>
> That looks like a F11 package. I was aski
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
Globe Trotter wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been missing audio after installing F11 (from the XFCE spin)
> on my IBM Thinkpad T61. I looked around and even tried the following:
>
> http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=206868&highlight=problems+sou
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 00:13:12 +0200
Mildred Ki'Lya wrote:
> Since recently, in Fedora 11, debugging software is becoming difficult.
> Neither GDB nor Valgrind can read debugging symbols from my executables.
I just tried building my Qt app "kewpie" with debug info and running
it under debugger, and
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
> I've been trying to get vsftpd working but have had no luck so far. This is
> my config:
>
> anonymous_enable=NO
> local_enable=YES
> write_enable=YES
> local_umask=022
> dirmessage_enable=YES
> xferlog_enable=YES
> connect_from_port_20=YES
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 23:37 -0700, john wendel wrote:
> On 07/14/2009 10:02 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 20:31 -0700, john wendel wrote:
> >> Looks like our junk is similar - Intel chip
> >>
> >> I had lots of sound problems until I moved to a 2.6.30 kernel. You'll
> >> note tha
I fixed it. The problem had nothing to do with Linux whatsoever. It
was a bonehead problem caused by me. Someday when I am not mad at
myself and way behind schedule I'll talk about it.
I re installed kernel kernel-2.6.31-0.69.rc3.fc12.i586.rpm. It works OK
as far as I can tell.
LG
--
fedora
Hi,
Since recently, in Fedora 11, debugging software is becoming difficult.
Neither GDB nor Valgrind can read debugging symbols from my executables.
Debug symbols shipped with the distribution are readable. So for
example, when i'm debugging my code, I can access local variables when
I'm inside t
Try running
strace hp-setup
This should tell you where it is hanging. I tried hp-setup on my F11 system
and it works fine. Note you may have to install the strace package. strace
will tell you what system calls are being executed by the program being
traced. There is also ltrace which traces
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/16/09 15:33, quoth Christoph Höger:
> Hi,
>
> is there a lightweight spam filter out there that works well with
> postfix?
> Especially important would be to whitelist some servers I forward mail
> from that already run a spamfilter.
>
> regard
--- On Thu, 7/16/09, linux guy wrote:
> Here is my grub file. The boot
> partition is /dev/sda1. That should
> be hd0,0, right ? The root partition is
> sda2. That should be
> hd0,1, right ?
>
> Does anyone see anything wrong with my grub setup ?
>
Check your /boot/grub/device.map fi
> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:59:19 -0400
> From: cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net
> To: fedora-list@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: F11 upgrade - worse than Windows
>
> Peter J. Stieber wrote:
>
>> Thanks for all of the help Kevin.
>>
>> What can I do to start obtain
Hi,
I have been missing audio after installing F11 (from the XFCE spin) on my IBM
Thinkpad T61. I looked around and even tried the following:
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=206868&highlight=problems+sound
but this did nothing. alsamixer -c0 brought in a while lot of stuff and I
PS = Pete Stieber
PS So your feeling is I should abort the
PS currently stuck install?
KC = Kevin J. Cummings
KC>>> If you can't find out what's been installed
KC>>> and what isn't, yes, I'd abort and try again.
KC>>> Seems I always end up doing that anyways. B^)
KC>>>
KC>>> 24x80 is *not
Peter J. Stieber wrote:
PS = Pete Stieber
PS>> Thanks for all of the help Kevin.
PS>>
PS>> What can I do to start obtaining fc11
PS>> rpms with yum?
KC = Kevin Cummings
KC> Check your fedora-release package. It
KC> should be the f11 one. If so, you'll
KC> use f11 repos. If not, you'll use f10
> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:33:51 -0700
> From: develo...@toyon.com
> To: fedora-list@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: F11 upgrade - worse than Windows
>
> PS = Pete Stieber
> PS So your feeling is I should abort the
> PS currently stuck install?
>
> KC
> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:56:07 -0700
> From: develo...@toyon.com
> To: fedora-list@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: F11 upgrade - worse than Windows
>
> PS = Pete Stieber
> PS>> So your feeling is I should abort the
> PS>> currently stuck install?
>
> KC = Ke
> From: akons...@sbcglobal.net
> To: fedora-list@redhat.com
> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:38:40 -0500
> Subject: Re: Cannot get Flash working with Fedora 11
>
> On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 10:32 -0400, Doctor Who wrote:
>> When I visit a site with Flash, either t
PS = Pete Stieber
PS>> Thanks for all of the help Kevin.
PS>>
PS>> What can I do to start obtaining fc11
PS>> rpms with yum?
KC = Kevin Cummings
KC> Check your fedora-release package. It
KC> should be the f11 one. If so, you'll
KC> use f11 repos. If not, you'll use f10
KC> repos. Get/install
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 12:04 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> An RC version has been available for at least a couple of weeks:
>
> % rpm -q vlc
> vlc-1.0.0-0.12rc4.fc11.x86_64
That looks like a F11 package. I was asking about a F10 update.
I may just abandon 3D for a while and move up to F11
Peter J. Stieber wrote:
Thanks for all of the help Kevin.
What can I do to start obtaining fc11 rpms with yum?
Check your fedora-release package. It should be the f11 one. If so,
you'll use f11 repos. If not, you'll use f10 repos. Get/install it by
hand if you have to
Pete
--
PS = Pete Stieber
PS So your feeling is I should abort the
PS currently stuck install?
KC = Kevin J. Cummings
KC>>> If you can't find out what's been installed
KC>>> and what isn't, yes, I'd abort and try again.
KC>>> Seems I always end up doing that anyways. B^)
KC>>>
KC>>> 24x80 is *n
> I downloaded the supergrub iso and installed it onto my usb drive.
> When I boot from it, it gives me the grub> command line. Is that a
> sign I don't have the USB installation right or is that the tool that
>I am supposed to use to fix my non booting drive ?
I dont know supergrub
but my advic
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 14:59:58 -0400,
linux guy wrote:
> I downloaded the supergrub iso and installed it onto my usb drive.
> When I boot from it, it gives me the grub> command line. Is that a
> sign I don't have the USB installation right or is that the tool that
> I am supposed to use to fi
Hi,
I've tried to run hp-setup and after the copyright it just hangs there.
those are the packages I have installed
hplip-gui-3.9.2-4.fc11.i586
hplip-3.9.2-4.fc11.i586
hplip-libs-3.9.2-4.fc11.i586
the debug option does not add much
[r...@thinkpad andrea]# hp-setup -g
HP Linux Imaging and Pri
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 14:58:00 -0400,
linux guy wrote:
>
> default=0
> timeout=15
> splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
> hiddenmenu
> title Fedora (2.6.29.5-191.fc11.i586)
> root (hd0,0)
> kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.29.5-191.fc11.i586 ro
> root=UUID=f543d554-9344-4cad-a7da-47de47
Peter J. Stieber wrote:
PS = Pete Stieber
PS>> So your feeling is I should abort the
PS>> currently stuck install?
KC = Kevin J. Cummings
KC> If you can't find out what's been installed
KC> and what isn't, yes, I'd abort and try again.
KC> Seems I always end up doing that anyways. B^)
KC>
KC>
> Here is my grub file. The boot partition is /dev/sda1. That should
> be hd0,0, right ?The root partition is sda2. That should be
> hd0,1, right ?
> Does anyone see anything wrong with my grub setup ?
> I don't understand how installing an f12 kernel and then uninstalling
> it could stil
linux guy wrote:
I downloaded the supergrub iso and installed it onto my usb drive.
When I boot from it, it gives me the grub> command line. Is that a
sign I don't have the USB installation right or is that the tool that
I am supposed to use to fix my non booting drive ?
Thanks
On 7/16/09, lin
PS = Pete Stieber
PS>> So your feeling is I should abort the
PS>> currently stuck install?
KC = Kevin J. Cummings
KC> If you can't find out what's been installed
KC> and what isn't, yes, I'd abort and try again.
KC> Seems I always end up doing that anyways. B^)
KC>
KC> 24x80 is *not* enough buf
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
>
> You don't want a live CD but to run the f11 DVD in rescue mode. Then you
> can chroot to the F11 / directory and apply any fixes. That way the
> programs you run will be F11 programs.
>
If you read the thread, I did chroot. Chroot runs w
Christoph Höger wrote:
Hi,
is there a lightweight spam filter out there that works well with
postfix?
IMHO, if there was an effective lightweight SPAM filter out there, SPAM
wouldn't be the problem that it is today
Especially important would be to whitelist some servers I forward mail
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 21:33 +0200, Christoph Höger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a lightweight spam filter out there that works well with
> postfix?
> Especially important would be to whitelist some servers I forward mail
> from that already run a spamfilter.
>
> regards
>
> christoph
spamassassin i
Peter J. Stieber wrote:
So your feeling is I should abort the currently stuck install?
If you can't find out what's been installed and what isn't, yes, I'd
abort and try again. Seems I always end up doing that anyways. B^)
24x80 is *not* enough buffer space on any of the 3 log screens to b
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 10:32 -0400, Doctor Who wrote:
> When I visit a site with Flash, either the area containing Flash
> animations does not work (like adobe.com) or with a video (like
> YouTube) I get the video initally then it just changes to a gray box.
> I'm not sure what's going on here.
>
>
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 16:07 +, davide wrote:
> linux guy gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> > I am now running from a Fedora 9 live CD I had laying around. I can
> > see the hard drive and its partitions from the live session. How
> > would I fix the F11 installation so it runs again ? Is it pos
Hi,
is there a lightweight spam filter out there that works well with
postfix?
Especially important would be to whitelist some servers I forward mail
from that already run a spamfilter.
regards
christoph
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
--
fedora-list
> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:26:11 -0700
> From: develo...@toyon.com
> To: fedora-list@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: F11 upgrade - worse than Windows
>
> PS = Pete Stieber
> PS>> Thanks Kevin. That's exactly what I needed!
> PS>>
> PS>> In the shell I ran top,
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 21:02 +0530, Anant More wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm trying to install 'fedora 11' in to my system, while this I'm not
> able to make '/boot' partition. I have 2 HDD's in system, in 1st disk
> I have windows XP, and want to install 'fedora 11' on 2nd disk!
> If I'm trying for '/boot'
PS = Pete Stieber
PS>> Thanks Kevin. That's exactly what I needed!
PS>>
PS>> In the shell I ran top, and Xorg is consuming 97%
PS>> of CPU with anaconda consuming the rest. Maybe
PS>> the video driver is causing me grief.
PS>>
PS>> Is there anything I can do to give anaconda more
PS>> priority o
Peter J. Stieber wrote:
Thanks Kevin. That's exactly what I needed!
In the shell I ran top, and Xorg is consuming 97% of CPU with anaconda
consuming the rest. Maybe the video driver is causing me grief.
Is there anything I can do to give anaconda more priority or get Xorg
out of the way?
TM = Timothy Murphy
TM I'm trying to upgrade a Thinkpad T23 (with
TM preupgrade) from F10. Everything went fine
TM until "Finishing upgrade process", which
TM has been running now for 14 hours, with that
TM ghastly imitation-Windows yo-yo swinging
TM from side to side.
TM>
I downloaded the supergrub iso and installed it onto my usb drive.
When I boot from it, it gives me the grub> command line. Is that a
sign I don't have the USB installation right or is that the tool that
I am supposed to use to fix my non booting drive ?
Thanks
On 7/16/09, linux guy wrote:
> He
> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:52:09 -0700
> From: develo...@toyon.com
> To: fedora-list@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: F11 upgrade - worse than Windows
>
> PS = Pete Stieber
> PS>> How did you get a shell when you were in the
> PS>> "Please wait while setup is f
Here is my grub file. The boot partition is /dev/sda1. That should
be hd0,0, right ?The root partition is sda2. That should be
hd0,1, right ?
Does anyone see anything wrong with my grub setup ?
I don't understand how installing an f12 kernel and then uninstalling
it could still result in a
PS = Pete Stieber
PS>> How did you get a shell when you were in the
PS>> "Please wait while setup is finished. This
PS>> may take a while" state?
KC = Kevin J. Cummings
KC> CTRL-ALT-F2 usually does it when you are running
KC> anaconda
PS>> I'm stuck in this state with a desktop machine.
PS>
TM = Timothy Murphy wrote:
TM I'm trying to upgrade a Thinkpad T23 (with
TM preupgrade) from F10. Everything went fine
TM until "Finishing upgrade process", which
TM has been running now for 14 hours, with
TM that ghastly imitation-Windows yo-yo
TM swinging from side to sid
I've been trying to get vsftpd working but have had no luck so far. This is
my config:
anonymous_enable=NO
local_enable=YES
write_enable=YES
local_umask=022
dirmessage_enable=YES
xferlog_enable=YES
connect_from_port_20=YES
xferlog_file=/var/log/vsftpd.log
xferlog_std_format=YES
ascii_upload_enabl
Peter J. Stieber wrote:
How did you get a shell when you were in the "Please wait while setup is
finished. This may take a while" state?
CTRL-ALT-F2 usually does it when you are running anaconda
I'm stuck in this state with a desktop machine. I'm updating F10 -> F11
with the network in
> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:17:50 -0700
> From: develo...@toyon.com
> To: fedora-list@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: F11 upgrade - worse than Windows
>
> TM = Timothy Murphy wrote:
> TM>> I'm trying to upgrade a Thinkpad T23 (with preupgrade) from F10.
> TM>>
See the "software upgrade failed" thread on this list.
Due to all mirrors out of sync, any network install
(or install with online repositories included) is impossible
at now. I learned that on Sunday, July 12. I did terminate
an installation from DVD with online repositories
included. An offline
Is anyone else seeing this failure in fwbackups under
Fedora 10? I find that when I start fwbackups, click on
the One-Time Backup, select a directory in my user account
and then select a directory on an external usb firewire drive
(ext3) which I have write permission to that the backup fails
wit
TM = Timothy Murphy wrote:
TM>> I'm trying to upgrade a Thinkpad T23 (with preupgrade) from F10.
TM>> Everything went fine until "Finishing upgrade process",
TM>> which has been running now for 14 hours,
TM>> with that ghastly imitation-Windows yo-yo swinging from side to side.
TM>>
TM>> I am told
> I did that, twice, first off, before I ever posted to the group. The
> f12 kernel installed to default 0 and then I had 2 f11 2.6.29 kernels
> in positions 1 and 2. I changed the default to both of them and
> neither would boot.
I have had this problem often when I've been moving disks aroun
All traces of the f12 kernel have been removed without errors via rpm.
My computer still won't boot.
When I run fdisk on sda (the hard disk), partition 1 is still set to
boot and the ID is still 83/Linux. Everything looks good.
Why won't my computer boot ?
On 7/16/09, linux guy wrote:
>> To f
linux guy wrote:
To fix Grub fast and easy, after editing the kernel grouping, or
anything else out of /boot/grub/grub.conf, you can grab a livecd that
works good on fixing a broken grub boot, called super grub disk (I have
used it plenty of times when a borked boot of a fedora box happened to
m
> To fix Grub fast and easy, after editing the kernel grouping, or
> anything else out of /boot/grub/grub.conf, you can grab a livecd that
> works good on fixing a broken grub boot, called super grub disk (I have
> used it plenty of times when a borked boot of a fedora box happened to
> me) and it
Jim wrote:
On 07/16/2009 11:55 AM, suvayu ali wrote:
You rename it to what ever name is mentioned in the page and put it in
/lib/firmware.
I'm sorry but I don't understand this paragraph, what page ?
suvayu, Thanks for your help on this.
I am sorry for being unclear. Was getting late for a
So here is what I did:
- open a regular (non chroot) session.
- cd to /media/-/
- mount /dev/sda1 boot /dev/sda1 is the /media/-boot/ drive. I
found this out by doing a df and looking at the mappings.
- the mount has to be done in the NON chroot session because the
chroot session doesn't have a
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Seann Clark wrote:
> linux guy wrote:
>
>> No joy. All I got was the same blinking cursor. I'm running from the
>> F9 Live CD.
>>
>> BTW: chroot above was actually /usr/sbin/chroot. And the yum problem
>> with the repos wasn't the repos at all. The chroot sess
linux guy wrote:
No joy. All I got was the same blinking cursor. I'm running from the
F9 Live CD.
BTW: chroot above was actually /usr/sbin/chroot. And the yum problem
with the repos wasn't the repos at all. The chroot session doesn't
have access to the network. ping www.google.com returns
No joy. All I got was the same blinking cursor. I'm running from the
F9 Live CD.
BTW: chroot above was actually /usr/sbin/chroot. And the yum problem
with the repos wasn't the repos at all. The chroot session doesn't
have access to the network. ping www.google.com returns "unknown
host" in t
After installing fc11 from dvd, I discovered there was no rt2860sta.ko module.
I then downloaded the kernel source rpm, reconfig'ed to support rt2860
and rebuilt and installed.
Now, rt2860sta.ko gets loaded and wpa_supplicant is happy.
___
I think I got it fixed. Here is what I did in case someone needs it someday :)
- booted F9 Live. Just because I had it around.
- opened Dolphin, because it displays the hard drives for the machine
- opened a terminal in Dolphin
- browse to the root directory of the hard drive
- did a pwd in the
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 23:57 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Does anyone know if rpm fusion will be releasing vlc 1.0.0 for F10? I
> want to try out the improved AVCHD support in 1.0.0, but I don't want to
> move up to F11 (not until I have 3D support for my HD3850 video card).
A
On 07/16/2009 11:55 AM, suvayu ali wrote:
You rename it to what ever name is mentioned in the page and put it in
/lib/firmware.
You rename it to what ever name is mentioned in the page and put it in
/lib/firmware.
I'm sorry but I don't understand this paragraph, what page ?
suvayu, Thanks for
Will chroot work when the target system has a broken kernel ? It
keeps running the old kernel ?
I tried using rpm with --dbpath so that it used the F11 rpm data. It
wouldn't run because of incompatible rpm versions.
On 7/16/09, davide wrote:
> linux guy gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>> I am now ru
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 09:02:09PM +0530, Anant More wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm trying to install 'fedora 11' in to my system, while this I'm not able
> to make '/boot' partition. I have 2 HDD's in system, in 1st disk I have
> windows XP, and want to install 'fedora 11' on 2nd disk!
> If I'm trying for
linux guy gmail.com> writes:
> I am now running from a Fedora 9 live CD I had laying around. I can
> see the hard drive and its partitions from the live session. How
> would I fix the F11 installation so it runs again ? Is it possible to
> do an rpm -e on the non running F11 partition fro
I'll give adjusting the timeout a try.
Thanks
On 7/16/09, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:30:59 -0400,
> linux guy wrote:
>> So... I found the koji site and I found a 2.6.31-rc3 kernel rpm for
>> fc12. It installed on my machine just fine with rpm -i.
>>
>> However, when
Probably I have the opportunity to set-up (in my spare time) 4 PC for
the library of the town where I live.
They have been given as a present and are Dell GX260 PC with good cpu
and ram (but) with 20Gb hard disk.
There is not a robust infrastructure in the library at the moment.
There are 5 PC with
Anant More wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm trying to install 'fedora 11' in to my system, while this I'm not
> able to make '/boot' partition. I have 2 HDD's in system, in 1st disk I
> have windows XP, and want to install 'fedora 11' on 2nd disk!
> If I'm trying for '/boot' partition it will generate a 'Unex
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
