On 10/05/2009 09:05 PM, Joshua C. wrote:
2009/10/5 Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com:
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 19:19 +0200, Joshua C. wrote:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x003cc3cd70b3 in __select_nocancel () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x004e615a in WaitForSomething (
pClientsReady=value
The report for 20091001 shows the following broken dependency, and it is
not listed in the report for 20091002:
perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP-0.85-3.fc11.noarch requires
perl(POE::Component::Client::Keepalive) = 0:0.0901
However, the report for 20091002 shows no relevant package update that
- Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com wrote:
But there's patch http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20901
you might wanna test it -- looked good.
As of now it's RESOLVED FIXED. Should be part of 2.6.32 kernel (when
is out).
Michal
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
Joshua C., Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:05:54 +0200:
Do we have a bug for this? If not, please do file one and include all
those information you collected for this thread together with /var/log/
Xorg.0.log (if possible after the problem happened -- on reboot put 3 to
the end of the kernel command line,
Hi,
the repository at http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/packages/
contains a lot of rawhide (f12) packages, so it can no longer be used
on f11, was that intentional?
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
Matej Cepl, Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:26:09 +:
However, for personal reasons I
need to decrease my personal involvment in non-work related Fedora work.
I have still on my list:
* cycle -- Calendar program for women (any ladies would like to decrease
gender gap in Fedora packaging? Or would
yum list all |grep olpc
dracut-modules-olpc.x86_64 0.2.1-2.fc12 rawhide
olpc-contents.x86_642.6-2.fc12 rawhide
olpc-library.noarch 2.0.2-2.fc12 rawhide
olpc-netutils.noarch
Hi,
I am a user of the 'usb_modeswitch'[1] tool which is also available as a Fedora
package.
Since this is a tool to be run as super-user but currently does not error out or
warn when it is not invoked by root. I thought that i'd file a bug against the
package to prompt for root password.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
yum list all |grep olpc
dracut-modules-olpc.x86_64 0.2.1-2.fc12 rawhide
olpc-contents.x86_64 2.6-2.fc12 rawhide
olpc-library.noarch
Hi!
Oracle released a new DB 4.8.24 recently and it is now ready to hit
rawhide. Before that happens I want to let you test your package(s)
with this new release so that we may delay updating to the latest
version if severe problems with it are reported.
With an exception of the RPC support
2009/10/6 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
yum list all |grep olpc
dracut-modules-olpc.x86_64 0.2.1-2.fc12
rawhide
olpc-contents.x86_64 2.6-2.fc12
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/6 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
yum list all |grep olpc
dracut-modules-olpc.x86_64 0.2.1-2.fc12
rawhide
Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/6 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
yum list all |grep olpc
dracut-modules-olpc.x86_64
A while ago there was a request to add a bug reporting URL to packages:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512774
This was added to Fedora's rpm recently, what's still missing is the
default contents of the %{bugurl} macro in redhat-rpm-config.
Opinions wanted:
a) just make it
Le 06/10/2009 14:48, Panu Matilainen a écrit :
A while ago there was a request to add a bug reporting URL to packages:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512774
This was added to Fedora's rpm recently, what's still missing is the
default contents of the %{bugurl} macro in
On Tuesday 06 October 2009 15:48:32 Panu Matilainen wrote:
This was added to Fedora's rpm recently, what's still missing is the
default contents of the %{bugurl} macro in redhat-rpm-config.
Opinions wanted:
a) just make it https://bugzilla.redhat.com
b) use
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 01:49:49PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi!
Oracle released a new DB 4.8.24 recently and it is now ready to hit
rawhide. Before that happens I want to let you test your package(s)
You mean devel/dist-f13. Rawhide is still tracking dist-f12.
/me tries to avoid confusion.
On 10/06/2009 06:43 PM, Juha Tuomala wrote:
On Tuesday 06 October 2009 15:48:32 Panu Matilainen wrote:
This was added to Fedora's rpm recently, what's still missing is the
default contents of the %{bugurl} macro in redhat-rpm-config.
Opinions wanted:
a) just make it
I'm trying to build the latest Asterisk sounds package, but I'm
getting the following error:
error: Recognition of file
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/asterisk-sounds-core-1.4.16-1.fc13.noarch/usr/share/asterisk/sounds/fr/digits/1.g729
failed: mode 100444 zlib: invalid stored block lengthsempty (gzip
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Juha Tuomala wrote:
On Tuesday 06 October 2009 15:48:32 Panu Matilainen wrote:
This was added to Fedora's rpm recently, what's still missing is the
default contents of the %{bugurl} macro in redhat-rpm-config.
Opinions wanted:
a) just make it https://bugzilla.redhat.com
b)
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 17:37 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Something like that is quite easily doable by adding a RPMTAG_BUGURL tag
extension which grabs its value from macro configuration if set, otherwise
use the contents from the package.
It is out of scope for this discussion though,
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE
On 10/06/2009 11:41 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
Matej Cepl, Fri, 02 Oct 2009 15:26:09 +:
However, for personal reasons I
need to decrease my personal involvment in non-work related Fedora work.
I have still on my list:
* vim-vimoutliner -- Script for building an outline editor on top of Vim
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 17:37 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Something like that is quite easily doable by adding a RPMTAG_BUGURL tag
extension which grabs its value from macro configuration if set, otherwise
use the contents from the package.
It is out
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 09:32:08AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 01:49:49PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
Hi!
Oracle released a new DB 4.8.24 recently and it is now ready to hit
rawhide. Before that happens I want to let you test your package(s)
You mean devel/dist-f13.
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 19:59 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Well in that case rpm is the wrong place entirely, and ditto for respins
controlling their own bug report URLs. For these you'd want the bug
reporting URL in repodata instead: spins are creating their own
repositories so they can set
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 14:07 -0400, James Antill wrote:
Yum already keeps track of that:
already as in a brand new feature not seen outside of rawhide IIRC.
And that's great for packages installed via yum via repos, which leaves
the other junk to worry about.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora --
Compose started at Tue Oct 6 06:15:15 UTC 2009
Broken deps for ppc64
--
python-mwlib-0.11.2-3.20090522hg2956.fc12.ppc64 requires LabPlot
New package pure
A term-rewriting functional programming language
Removed
Le Mar 6 octobre 2009 17:03, Tom \spot\ Callaway a écrit :
On 10/06/2009 10:37 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
It is out of scope for this discussion though, the question here is
about the default value Fedora packages should have. The BUGURL tag
contents is just a plain old string which is
2009/10/6 Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com:
2009/10/6 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com:
Joshua C., Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:05:54 +0200:
Do we have a bug for this? If not, please do file one and include all
those information you collected for this thread together with /var/log/
Xorg.0.log (if
Le mardi 06 octobre 2009 20:15:40, Jesse Keating a écrit :
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 14:07 -0400, James Antill wrote:
Yum already keeps track of that:
already as in a brand new feature not seen outside of rawhide IIRC.
And that's great for packages installed via yum via repos, which leaves
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 17:00 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
that feature has been in since the first update of yum released for
f11.
so it's been in use for at least 6 months, now.
I stand corrected. I could have sworn we had a discussion about a late
landing change for the history db.
--
Jesse
Hi everybody,
I've started packaging TypePad Motion [1] and thrown it into a repo at
my FedoraPeople space [2] in case some of you wanted to give it a try.
It's pretty easy, just install the RPMs from above and run:
django-admin typepadproject mymotion --settings=motion.settings
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
which is that we should avoid making permanent optimizations, and
instead try to do runtime tests wherever possible. This is because
P2V, V2V and virtual machine migration makes it more likely that
CPU features such
There was at least one noarch package in today's Rawhide updates, and I
didn't see the usual md5 mismatch error when rebuilding the RPMs.
Does this mean that they are now being built on a little endian arch
(probably Intel), and if so, will this be done consistently from now on?
(At least until
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527214
--- Comment #3 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-10-06 03:23:21
EDT ---
re: 1-3: yeah, exactly. That's all that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527214
--- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2009-10-06 03:57:06 EDT ---
Great. thanks!
--
Configure bugmail:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058
--- Comment #7 from Hedayat Vatankhah heda...@grad.com 2009-10-06 04:30:47
EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058
Hedayat Vatankhah heda...@grad.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527406
Hedayat Vatankhah heda...@grad.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512079
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-10-06 06:06:13 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525498
--- Comment #4 from Denis Jacquerye moy...@gmail.com 2009-10-06 07:11:06 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #3)
Is this patch a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525498
--- Comment #5 from Denis Jacquerye moy...@gmail.com 2009-10-06 07:16:11 EDT
---
As far as I know, no hinting has gone
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525866
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454
--- Comment #10 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-10-06 12:02:47
EDT ---
Has nothing to do with fontconfig. I
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454
Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523454
--- Comment #12 from Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com 2009-10-06 13:16:37
EDT ---
What I meant was to go into the folder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526058
Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607
Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Author: salimma
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/EL-5
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32320/EL-5
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec
Log Message:
oflb-smonohand-fonts:
Author: salimma
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/EL-4
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32320/EL-4
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec
Log Message:
oflb-smonohand-fonts:
Author: salimma
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/F-12
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32320/F-12
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec
Log Message:
oflb-smonohand-fonts:
Author: salimma
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32320/F-11
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec
Log Message:
oflb-smonohand-fonts:
Author: salimma
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32320/devel
Added Files:
oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec
Log Message:
oflb-smonohand-fonts: initial import
--- NEW FILE
Author: salimma
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32320/F-10
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
oflb-smonohand-fonts-fontconfig.conf oflb-smonohand-fonts.spec
Log Message:
oflb-smonohand-fonts:
Author: salimma
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/oflb-smonohand-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1570
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Log Message:
Commit font TTF to devel branch
Index: .cvsignore
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525866
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-10-06
16:09:20 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I'm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-10-06 16:28:45 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526607
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2009-10-06 16:28:50 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527406
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Author: hedayat
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-scheherazade-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv9555/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log sil-scheherazade-fonts-fontconfig.conf
sil-scheherazade-fonts.spec
Log
Author: hedayat
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-scheherazade-fonts/F-10
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24044/F-10
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log sil-scheherazade-fonts-fontconfig.conf
sil-scheherazade-fonts.spec
Log
Author: hedayat
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-scheherazade-fonts/F-11
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26314/F-11
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log sil-scheherazade-fonts-fontconfig.conf
sil-scheherazade-fonts.spec
Log
Author: hedayat
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sil-scheherazade-fonts/F-12
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27733/F-12
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
import.log sil-scheherazade-fonts-fontconfig.conf
sil-scheherazade-fonts.spec
Log
On ۰۹/۱۰/۰۶ 01:12, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Lun 28 septembre 2009 17:25, Hedayat Vatankhah a écrit :
Hi all,
I've created a new font package request at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=526058
Any comments and/or suggestions are highly appreciated. Notice that this
is
Hello,
Is there a reason fontpackages is not available on EPEL (both EL-4 and
EL-5)? I don't currently have my CentOS virtual machine set up
(VirtualBox is a bit annoying to set up on Rawhide), otherwise I would
have tested this myself.
Thanks,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
Le Mar 6 octobre 2009 22:28, Michel Alexandre Salim a écrit :
Hello,
Hi
Is there a reason fontpackages is not available on EPEL (both EL-4 and
EL-5)? I don't currently have my CentOS virtual machine set up
(VirtualBox is a bit annoying to set up on Rawhide), otherwise I would
have tested
Hey guys,
Could people who are using the publictest machines please make sure that the
wiki pages for those machines are currently up to date?
For instance, I am trying to find the person currently testing sogod on
publictest15 after an out of space alert came up, however, looking at
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Nigel Jones nigjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey guys,
Could people who are using the publictest machines please make sure that the
wiki pages for those machines are currently up to date?
For instance, I am trying to find the person currently testing sogod on
I stopped the service after I found the cause, it was chkconfig'd on a the time.
- Nigel
- susmit shannigrahi thinklinux@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Nigel Jones nigjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hey guys,
Could people who are using the publictest machines please
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Because of its mess status should we just outright rebuild it?
Darren VanBuren
onekop...@gmail.com
http://theoks.net/
On Oct 6, 2009, at 12:58 AM, Nigel Jones wrote:
I stopped the service after I found the cause, it was
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Nigel Jones nigjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I stopped the service after I found the cause, it was chkconfig'd on a the
time.
oops. Sorry.
--
Regards,
Susmit.
=
ssh
0x86DD170A
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/user:susmit
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 04:21:43PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
Time: 3 PM EDT (19:00 UTC)
Date: 2009-10-07
^^ This Tuesday is 2009-10-06... just confirming.
This is several hours from now... Just reminding people that are
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009, Ac-town wrote:
Hey fedora-infrastructure-list, I would like to introduce myself to you all.
My name is Derrick, I go by the nick Actown
in IRC and I am currently a first year student at Oregon State University
studying computer science.
I started working with computers
Mike McGrath said the following on 10/06/2009 07:29 AM Pacific Time:
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 04:21:43PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
Time: 3 PM EDT (19:00 UTC)
Date: 2009-10-07
^^ This Tuesday is 2009-10-06... just confirming.
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:42:05 -0700,
John Poelstra poels...@redhat.com wrote:
Yes it is today at 3 PM EDT on #fedora-fad
I'll probably miss the meeting, but might make the tail end of it. I'll
be recording it though to review.
1) Nail down the package version of Asterisk that we will use
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:42:05 -0700,
John Poelstra poels...@redhat.com wrote:
Yes it is today at 3 PM EDT on #fedora-fad
I'll probably miss the meeting, but might make the tail end of it. I'll
be recording it though
I should mention that I'll be right in the middle of a class when this
meeting takes place.
Darren VanBuren
-
Sent from my iPod
Take control of your desktop with Fedora 11. Reign. http://fedoraproject.org/
On Oct 6, 2009, at 9:05, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
--
My LikedIn Profile: www.linkedin.com/in/sikku
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:42:05AM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
Mike McGrath said the following on 10/06/2009 07:29 AM Pacific Time:
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 04:21:43PM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
Time: 3 PM EDT (19:00 UTC)
Date: 2009-10-07
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-fad/2009-10-06/fedora-fad.2009-10-06-19.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-fad/2009-10-06/fedora-fad.2009-10-06-19.00.txt
Log:
Bruno Wolff III said the following on 10/06/2009 08:59 AM Pacific Time:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:42:05 -0700,
John Poelstra poels...@redhat.com wrote:
Yes it is today at 3 PM EDT on #fedora-fad
I'll probably miss the meeting, but might make the tail end of it. I'll
be recording it though
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, John Poelstra wrote:
Bruno Wolff III said the following on 10/06/2009 08:59 AM Pacific Time:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 08:42:05 -0700,
John Poelstra poels...@redhat.com wrote:
Yes it is today at 3 PM EDT on #fedora-fad
I'll probably miss the meeting, but might make
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 01:22:46PM +1000, Ruediger Landmann wrote:
On 10/06/2009 09:47 AM, Jeffrey Fearn wrote:
Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
IANAL, but this can be specified in single file, like
Common_Content/common/README: all the data in this directory is under
GFDL, but better check with your
On 10/06/2009 02:01 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
We need this license to be compatible with inclusion in works produced
by Fedora Docs, and in works that incorporate content from the Fedora
wiki, right? If CC0 can coexist peacefully in that role with the new
CC licensing used in both those
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 02:14:12PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 10/06/2009 02:01 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
We need this license to be compatible with inclusion in works produced
by Fedora Docs, and in works that incorporate content from the Fedora
wiki, right? If CC0 can coexist
On 10/06/2009 02:46 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 02:14:12PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 10/06/2009 02:01 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
We need this license to be compatible with inclusion in works produced
by Fedora Docs, and in works that incorporate content from the
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 09:31 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
I haven't found any client that would eliminate viewing follow ups
that are OT.
I seem to recall that hitting W again would unwatch a thread, from that
point onwards, and all it's descendants, not affecting parents or other
branches.
--
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 08:23 +0500, gil...@altern.org wrote:
When a thread has hundreds of posts, the discussion often becomes
irrelevant to the original post and then you have to find out answers
to your posts among hundred of posts. So, sometimes, you miss some
relevant answers to your posts,
On 06Oct2009 16:30, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
| On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 09:31 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
| I haven't found any client that would eliminate viewing follow ups
| that are OT.
|
| I seem to recall that hitting W again would unwatch a thread, from that
| point onwards, and
Jim wrote:
Trying to Relabel my Laptop and if I do a touch / autorelabel in
permissive mode.
what does 'touch /.autorelabel' do? note /.a
hth
--
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend
dear all
can anybody explain me .. what is lash panel in sound video portion on
Fedora 11 how do I use it ?? what is the purpose of it ???
what can be achieved by it ???
Regards
--
Jatin Khatri
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
On 10/06/2009 01:28 PM, Jatin K wrote:
dear all
can anybody explain me .. what is lash panel in sound video portion on
Fedora 11 how do I use it ?? what is the purpose of it ???
what can be achieved by it ???
http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/lash. IIRC, it is a dependency of
On 10/06/2009 01:26 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 10/06/2009 01:28 PM, Jatin K wrote:
dear all
can anybody explain me .. what is lash panel in sound video portion on
Fedora 11 how do I use it ?? what is the purpose of it ???
what can be achieved by it ???
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Dan Track dan.tr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Tait Clarridge t...@clarridge.ca wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 16:58 +0100, Dan Track wrote:
Hi,
I've just added a new hp array to my server and when looking in dmesg
I can see the following:
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:52:17 +0530, Jatin wrote:
On 10/06/2009 01:26 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 10/06/2009 01:28 PM, Jatin K wrote:
dear all
can anybody explain me .. what is lash panel in sound video portion on
Fedora 11 how do I use it ?? what is the purpose of
What has happened to rpmfusion? Its web site and download site seem to be gone.
--
Cheers
Erik.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
2009/10/6 Erik P. Olsen epod...@gmail.com
What has happened to rpmfusion? Its web site and download site seem to be
gone.
--
Cheers
Erik.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
