* Wolfgang S. Rupprecht [2009-12-02 14:47]:
>
> Cannot complete the install because one or more required items could not be
> found.
> Software being installed: Android Development Tools
> 0.9.4.v200910220141-17704 (com.android.ide.eclipse.adt.feature.group
> 0.9.4.v200910220141-17704)
> M
* Christoph Höger [2009-09-30 13:45]:
> Eclipse seems to cache bundles based on names and versions, so if you
> put a damaged plugin to dropins/ and overwrite it (what I tried) the
> new jar will not even be read if it has the same version - no warning,
> nothing.
It checks timestamps so if you d
* Christoph Höger [2009-09-30 06:55]:
> in the good old days there used to be a plugins/ folder somewhere inside
> ~/.eclipse .
Yes, this was before p2 in 3.4.
> For f11 (eclipse 3.4) I cannot find this folder anymore. Any ideas where
> it has gone?
I don't know if it's possible to do it anymor
Hi Dan,
> Tomcat5 is structurally different, almost completely
> "rearranged" and tomcat6 has missing pieces that
> could not be found, or so the error messages say.
I suggest you file a bug with the tomcat package in Fedora. This
package originated at JPackage so you may want to discuss with th
I've heard good things about:
http://eclipsetutorial.sourceforge.net/introduction.html
Andrew
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
* Daniel B. Thurman [2009-08-28 14:53]:
> Can I get the the fix now, at least so I can continue on or do
> I need to wait for upstream to release the fix, sometime in
> the future?
There will not be a release of 3.4 with that fix [1]. The fix is there
and we carry it in our Fedora packages. You
* Mark Wielaard [2009-08-27 16:36]:
> I am sure we want to fix any issues that prevent Eclipse's Ganemede from
> working out of the box.
Eclipse works just fine with OpenJDK.
I've spoken with Dan offline and while I don't have confirmation, I
suspect he was bitten by the fact that the XULRunner
* Daniel B. Thurman [2009-08-26 16:45]:
> have to figure out if I can downgrade from v1.6x to v1.4x,
> which may not be possible or is it?
I don't know. If it's important, I suggest asking the subversion
maintainer.
Glad you got things straightened around,
Andrew
--
fedora-list mailing list
* Daniel B. Thurman [2009-08-26 15:28]:
> I downloaded Galileo from Eclipse. What are the steps to
> get a working SVN package installed?
I don't use this kind of setup as the Fedora packages work great for me
and allow me to use javahl with my ssh keys which I've always found to a
bit a of a PI
* Daniel B. Thurman [2009-08-26 13:29]:
>>> I checked. It does not work at all.
>>>
>> You love the inflammatory subjects and statements,eh? :)
>>
> Was that a joke? It was specifically on SVN and perhaps a
> localized problem, i.e. maybe it's just me! :)
Yes, I was kidding :)
> I c
Hi Dan,
> I checked. It does not work at all.
You love the inflammatory subjects and statements,eh? :)
FWIW, as usual, everything works perfectly fine for me.
> How does one get the latest updates with Fedora's
> version of Eclipse w/o trashing Fedora's Eclipse
> configurations?
yum update?
* Developer [2009-07-29 13:43]:
> Before (fc10) and after upgrade (fc11) Eclipse seems that close, but do
> not at all. Still remains open in background.
> If I run it again generates another process.
>
> Anyone knows how to solve this problem?
I don't know why this is happening for you. I can'
* Oliver Ruebenacker [2009-07-24 11:13]:
> Recovered: after doing "eclipse -clean" and removing .eclipse, Java
> and SVN perspective are available.
Yes, this is a known bug in the 3.4 series upstream. It's fixed in 3.5
which will be in F-12. Sorry about this.
Andrew
--
fedora-list mailing
> I just upgraded from F10 to F11 with the preupgrade that popped up
> spontaneously. Now, when I open Eclipse, it seems to have lost all its
> Java and SVN capabilities. The SVN plugins still are listed as
> installed, and I don't know what components Eclipse needs to do Java.
Try running with
* Neal Becker [2009-06-30 07:20]:
> Any ideas? Eclipse was working before update, now fails on startup:
mv ~/.eclipse{,.brokenduetoupstreambug} and re try. Lame, I know, but
it'll probably work.
Andrew
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 16:47 +0100, Yoram Halberstam wrote:
> Also, I'd like to know why eclipse under fedora (sun or fedora
> packaged) do not work with sun jdk it only works with open jdk. (just
> asking whilst we are on the subject).
There's no reason it shouldn't work.
Andrew
--
fedora-list
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 17:05 +0200, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> I'm thinking to write an article about the features Fedora users like
> in Eclipse.
Let me know if you need a hand. I'd love to see a draft :)
Andrew
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.
* Daniel B. Thurman [2009-05-01 17:20]:
>
> F10 seems to be running Eclipse v3.4.1, and to my surprise,
> SVN Repository Perspective does not seem to have the
> authorization entries for those who need it? I have no
> place to enter the name and password in order to open
> my repository!
I think
* Daniel B. Thurman [2009-05-01 16:49]:
> http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn
Works for me with:
eclipse-subclipse-1.4.7-3.fc11.noarch
See this URL for proof:
http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/svn.png
Andrew
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.co
* Daniel B. Thurman [2009-05-01 16:09]:
> Andrew Overholt wrote:
>> yum install eclipse-subclipse
>>
> Package eclipse-subclipse-1.2.4-11.fc9.i386 already installed and latest
> version
> Nothing to do
Did you try using it?
Andrew
--
fedora-list mailing list
f
Instead, try:
yum install eclipse-subclipse
Andrew
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
* Ian Malone [2009-04-18 19:12]:
> 2009/4/17 Deepak Bhole :
>
> >
> > PS: Out of curiosity.. why do you need the Sun VM? Is something lacking
> > in OpenJDK?
> >
>
> Well for me, the Facebook image uploader applet crashes FF under
> OpenJDK
This was something Deepak specifically tested and I kn
* anonymous [2009-04-17 12:21]:
> PHP and Python plugins don't work with the NetBeans in the repository, or at
> least they didn't two months ago.
Please file a bug against the netbeans package in Fedora to see if they
are expected to work.
Thanks,
Andrew
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-li
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 09:44 -0400, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
> com.sun.imageio.plugins.jpeg.JPEGImageWriter,
> com.sun.java.swing.plaf.windows.WindowsDesktopManager).
>
> Is there anything on the Fedora repositories that fixes the problem,
> perhaps even a different Java? Do I need Sun's Ja
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 21:51 -0400, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
> I'm using Fedora Eclipse with OpenJDK 5.0, and although I checked
> "allocate console" in the run configuration, System.console() returns
> null. Any idea how I can get my console, which I need for user
> terminal input? Output v
* François Patte [2009-03-18 04:59]:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Le 18/03/2009 09:39, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
> > François Patte wrote:
> >> I installed jre from Sun
> >
> > Why? What's wrong with OpenJDK as provided by Fedora?
>
> Nothing! Except that the ministry of i
* Erik P. Olsen [2009-03-18 05:17]:
> Den 18-03-2009 09:39, Kevin Kofler skrev:
> > François Patte wrote:
> >> I installed jre from Sun
> >
> > Why? What's wrong with OpenJDK as provided by Fedora?
>
> For example doesn't net banking work with OpenJDK (at least with my
> bank) whereas jre from S
* mantra UNIX [2009-03-12 18:23]:
> Can some one pl. point me to a working link/article/show configuring
> javaplugin for firefox.
$ yum install java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin
Ensure your alternative is pointing to java-1.6.0-openjdk.x86_64
# alternatives --config java
Andrew
--
fedora-list maili
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 16:06 -0500, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
> Hello, All,
>
> I am running F10 and installed via yum Java and Eclipse, including
> eclipse-jdk and java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel.i386. I can run Java and
> Eclipse, but there is no Java perspective in Eclipse. Am I missing a
> package?
* Patrick Steiner [2009-02-13 01:26]:
> Take a look at this bugzilla entry:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484858
That has to do with OpenJDK and not the Sun JDK.
Andrew
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fe
* Nigel Henry [2009-01-31 15:27]:
> Where do I get the java plugin from for F10.
yum install java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=72813
Andrew
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/f
Hi,
* Nigel Henry [2009-01-31 11:54]:
> I assume your asking me to try the F10 version of the plugin on F9. Yes?
I'm not sure it's been tested on F9 but yes, that's what he meant.
> I am still puzzled though, as to why, on Opera, and Konqueror, if I set a
> path
> to java, as on my original p
* Kevin Kofler [2009-01-29 15:10]:
> Noel wrote:
> > I heard that back in FC4, Red Hat compiled the
> > Java-based Eclipse into native machine code,
> > making it quicker to start and run.
> > What happened to that? I can't find it in F10...
>
> Unfortunately, OpenJDK's JIT is actually faster tha
Hi,
* Noel [2009-01-28 22:50]:
> I heard that back in FC4, Red Hat compiled the
> Java-based Eclipse into native machine code,
> making it quicker to start and run.
A bigger reason was because we didn't have a JIT so ahead-of-time
compilation was our only real option. We now have OpenJDK.
> W
* Dick Holland [2009-01-01 03:39]:
> I'm running 64-bit Fedora 8 which has this Eclipse onboard: "Fedora
> Eclipse Platform Version: 3.3.0 Based on build id: I20070625-1500".
>
> I have installed the Eclipse Plug-in version of Aptana Studio 1.2.1 as
> per the instructions on http://www.aptana.com
* Steven M. Parrish [2008-12-23 09:06]:
> I am having an issue with Eclipse failing to start on F10.
Try running with the -clean option. If that doesn't work, try moving
~/.eclipse out of the way: mv ~/.eclipse{,.bak20081223}; eclipse . If
*that* doesn't work, run with -consolelog -debug and p
* Linuxguy123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-12-04 22:12]:
> I'm happy to report that, thanks to extensive efforts by Andrew, we have
> solved the problem of Fedora's eclipse not running on my F10
> installation.
Thanks for your patience in tracking this down. I also appreciate you
going the extra dis
* Linuxguy123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-12-04 02:42]:
> I got Eclipse working by installing the 3.4.0 package from Eclipse.org
> and then updating from there. No problems. It runs great.
>
> The yum installed Eclipse will not run for me. I submitted a bug to the
> Fedora Bugzilla.
This isn't r
* Linuxguy123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-12-02 23:53]:
> It crashes when I start it up.
Send the output of the commands on this page:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebuggingEclipseProblems
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/
Hi,
- "Linuxguy123" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been trying to install Eclipse on my computer for 2 days, on
> and off. It worked once, after some fiddling, but its messed up now.
I'm sorry you've had this experience. I haven't had any reports of anyone
else having issues and can'
Hi,
- "Linuxguy123" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So how do we get Eclipse to run on F10 ?
I realize this isn't going to help you, but it runs just fine for me and
others on F10. yum install eclipse-pde will get you the Eclipse SDK. I can't
think of anything you can do other than verify al
Hi,
- "Paul Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With a view to getting data for a bug report
I appreciate the thought but I'm 99% sure your issue is the same one already
being investigated upstream. Thanks.
> After reinstalling with "yum install eclipse-cdt", everything still
> seems to wo
* Linuxguy123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-12-01 10:10]:
> On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 09:59 -0500, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> > * Paul Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-12-01 09:57]:
> > > The "cure" seems to be to run Eclipse as root once - this is something
> >
* Paul Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-12-01 09:57]:
> The "cure" seems to be to run Eclipse as root once - this is something
> that's happened for F10 (F9 didn't have this issue).
Please don't do this. This causes files to be created as root which
then can't be over-written by regular users whic
* Linuxguy123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-12-01 09:48]:
> !ENTRY org.eclipse.equinox.app 0 0 2008-11-30 08:42:07.168
> !MESSAGE Product org.fedoraproject.ide.platform.product could not be
> found.
Try running with -clean.
Andrew
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: h
* Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-06 10:30]:
>
> Andrew Overholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-06 09:03]:
> > > I did some experiments and I was able to reproduce the same problem if
> > > I only inst
* Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-06 09:03]:
> I did some experiments and I was able to reproduce the same problem if
> I only installed:
> java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.18.b09.fc9.i386
> java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-0.18.b09.fc9.x86_64
>
> ie don't install the x86_64 package of openjdk. If
Hi,
(adding fedora-devel-java-list to the discussion)
* Christoph Höger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-04 07:09]:
>
> I've just compiled scilab on my f9 laptop and tried to run it, but get a
> lot of libraries missing. Ldd says that some java libs (libjava.so,
> libjvm.so) are not found. Those lib
* Steve Dowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-21 10:40]:
>
> Obviously, given this I guess there's not a lot of point me doing the
> other commands, simply because Zend uses it's own JRE, not Fedora's.
Yup :)
Andrew
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.re
* Steve Dowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-21 10:03]:
>
> I'm trying to run Zend Studio (32 bit) on fedora 9 x84_64, but am coming
> across a problem with network access. Specifically, when Zend starts up
> it can perform an update check, but this fails almost immediately with a
> useless message (
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 23:40 +0200, MKas wrote:
> Why I can't uninstall java-1.5.0 through yum without uninstalling
> openoffice? (I have downloaded java-1.6.0 so I don't need java-1.5.0
> anymore)
Because OpenOffice needs some java parts and the accompanying gcj bits
require gcj. The regular java
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 21:46 -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> I cannot find how to get javac on Fedora 9,
yum install java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel
or
yum install /usr/bin/javac
HTH,
Andrew
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/f
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 13:28 -0700, charles f. zeitler wrote:
> /home/fedora_9/rpmbuild/BUILD/eclipse-3.3.2/plugins/org.eclipse.swt.tools/build.xml:88:
> Unable to
> find a javac compiler;
> com.sun.tools.javac.Main is not on the classpath.
> Perhaps JAVA_HOME does not point to the JDK.
> It is cur
Hi Charles,
* charles f. zeitler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-21 23:58]:
> > "${CLASSPATH}" -Djava.library.path="${PROGRAM_DIR}"
> > -Dazureus.install.path="${PROGRAM_DIR}"
> > -Dazureus.script="$0" $JAVA_PROPS $START_CLASS "$@"
> > Exit from Azureus complete
> > No shutdown tasks to do
> > Azure
54 matches
Mail list logo
