On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Jesse Keatingjkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 07:38 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
I don't draw the line, the maintainers of each package draw their own
line. I just sit back and comfortably sip on my mai tai while the
people who know best make
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Jesse Keatingjkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 17:47 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote:
Yea well, I dunno about you guys who run rawhide. But as an F-11 user,
I am *very* glad I use KDE and the KDE SIG is giving me the latest and
greatest to use. I
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Adam Williamsonawill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:36 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 14:26 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, I think it's really the same issue. The problem is one of
expectation: we have two similar
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Adam Jacksona...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 13:55 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
The KDE SIG is now working on KDE-4.3.0-related builds for Fedora 10 and
11 candidate updates. As this requires some buildroot overrides, if your
package uses KDE libraries,
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Rex Dieterrdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Christopher Stone wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Adam Jacksona...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 13:55 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
The KDE SIG is now working on KDE-4.3.0-related builds for Fedora 10 and
11
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Jesse Keatingjkeat...@redhat.com wrote:
http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/failed-f12-rebuilds.html
xulchris (1):
spambayes
From build log:
+ /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id
/builddir/build/BUILD/spambayes-1.0.4
find: `debug': No such file or
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Adam Millermaxamill...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Christopher
Stonechris.st...@gmail.com wrote:
Whatever desktop RH employees are paid to work on to satisfy their
biggest RHEL customers needs. Or what they *think* their biggest RHEL
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Matthew
Woehlkemw_tr...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 11:05 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
The problem with preupgrade is that it needs user interaction and a
lot of space. It downloads the distro update locally,
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi, I'm Scruffy, the Fedora Janitor.
Hi Scruffy, I maintain a lot of php packages which show up on Seth's
list. As far as I know all my php packages are correct in their
directory ownership. Please contact me before
Author: xulchris
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-MP3-Info/devel
In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26265/devel
Modified Files:
perl-MP3-Info.spec
Log Message:
fix license tag
Index: perl-MP3-Info.spec
===
+52,9 @@
%changelog
+* Sun Sep 30 2007 Christopher Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.23-1
+- Upstream sync
+
* Sat Sep 08 2007 Christopher Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.22-3
- Add BuildRequires perl(Test::More)
Index: sources
===
RCS file
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@
%changelog
+* Sun Sep 30 2007 Christopher Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.23-1
+- Upstream sync
+
* Sat Sep 08 2007 Christopher Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.22-3
- Add BuildRequires perl(Test::More)
Index: sources
12 matches
Mail list logo
