On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 14:15 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Hey,
one change we are planning to make to the desktop spin in F13 is to go
from targeting a cd to targeting a 1g usb stick.
Why 1GB? It seemed to me, when discussing this earlier on this list,
that everyone agreed that 2GB made much
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 23:34 -0500, Chris Ball wrote:
Given the above, do you think you'd be okay with having:
Filesystem snapshot that will be active on next boot: drop-down
Shouldn't it say next time volume is mounted instead of next boot?
We can always special case rootfs to say next
. Do you know who
it was?
I don't see why FESCo should be involved and I have no idea who made
this decision. I would have preferred the change to be announced and
documented in detail regardless of that. I assume David Zeuthen? (CC'ed)
Jeez, Rahul. This has nothing to do with polkit per se
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 10:47 -0500, Chris Ball wrote:
Also, what is the mechanism to configure this? Just a simple
command from btrfs-progs (best)? Or does it require surgery to
/etc/fstab and/or the initramfs (bad)?
Josef's been thinking about exactly that -- the current
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 12:45 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I'd be willing to maintain PolicyKit 0.9 packages (as compatibility
packages
(though renaming should not be needed as they already have distinct names),
to be used by KDE) for F12. It is my understanding that those will not
Hi,
This is an accurate description of how things work, thanks to Matthias
for clearing things up on this list. There's more background information
about this particular thing here
http://hal.freedesktop.org/docs/polkit/
http://hal.freedesktop.org/docs/polkit/PolicyKit-1.8.html
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 21:11 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 03:02:53PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 19:09 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Can the malware inject code into the process which gained the
authentication (eg. using ptrace)?
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 11:23 +0100, drago01 wrote:
Yeah, you need a new enough hal aparently, which I guess f8 didn't have.
F9 should be safe to be using just the sysfs stuff.
I have not tested rawhide on a laptop yet, but it seems that rawhide
still uses hal-0.5.10 (which is also the
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 14:08 -0500, Eric Paris wrote:
Can you show me more of the log?
The log is more sgrubb.
I think selinux-policy is busted at the moment. depmod and mkinitrd are
having trouble in enforcing...
rpm -e kernel-2.6.24-133-blah-blah
setenforce 0
yum update kernel
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 14:09 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 14:08 -0500, Eric Paris wrote:
Can you show me more of the log?
The log is more sgrubb.
Eh.. From.. the log is from sgrubb. That's what I meant.
David
On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 19:09 -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 01:02:23AM +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
Hi,
I just finished removing the sysprof-kmod package from CVS as mandated
by the new guidelines for F9 and above.
I am now seeking some help to understand what
Dave,
Please take a look at
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2c7afd125cc482dbdf6b0a169c42337e7e76cda5
Can we include this simple patch in Fedora 7 and Rawhide please? Without
this, events arrive in the wrong order meaning that udev and hal may get
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 14:59 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 09:24:09AM -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2c7afd125cc482dbdf6b0a169c42337e7e76cda5
Can we include this simple patch in Fedora 7
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 11:46 -0400, Max Spevack wrote:
==
Booting the LiveCD, grub gives you two options:
Fedora-7-Test3-Live-i386
Fedora-7-Test3-Live-i386 from RAM
This is confusing -- should I choose default or no? What's the difference
between the two? I think
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 19:54 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mercredi 04 avril 2007 à 12:47 -0400, David Zeuthen a écrit :
You missed my favorite pet peeve about the default desktop install. We
show two trash cans, one in lower panel and one on the desktop. Do we
_really_ want people
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 08:46 +0200, Nicu Buculei wrote:
The entire process of rounds is not needed anymore as we've had to
concede the default release theme work to the Desktop group inside Red Hat.
Well, the thing is that someone made promises (default theme) to the
participants on this list
Hi John,
Maybe this write-up by Jef is useful for you to read
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2007-January/msg00176.html
since I think you're confused about what open source means (you seem to
equate it with democracy). Anyway, I'm going to step out of this thread
for a
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 20:40 +0100, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
On 2/7/07, Diana Fong wrote:
2) creating the missing size variations of existing icons (Requires time
in resizing and possibly simplifying the existing icons to look its best
in smaller sizes).
Hello,
do you guys have an
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 17:22 +0100, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
On 2/5/07, John Baer wrote:
I was not aware the decision on the icon set had been made. Is *echo* really
ready for prime time?
It would be nice to get a little feed back on what's going on.
True, I would like to know as well
Hi Leo!
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 18:39 +, Leo wrote:
How many feedbacks do you get from making Echo the default icon theme?
Uhm, so the bugzilla is public, why do you ask for things you can look
up yourself? (hint: not a lot of feedback, people normally don't file
lot of bugs for things like
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 23:30 +0100, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
On 2/5/07, David Zeuthen wrote:
So I think Qt/KDE, or the Fedora packaging needs to be fixed instead and
I don't think it's that hard. Chitlesh, any chance you can look into
this? Thanks.
Hello,
Surely I'll have a look
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 08:09 +0100, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
thanks for working on it. Where can I have those new icons ? on the
wiki or are they already in the development repositories ?
I'll roll a new echo-icon-theme RPM for Rawhide sometime soonish at
least before Test 2.
Also, at some point
:
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 12:00 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
Either way, I think it could be interesting for someone to explore
this;
perhaps write a small brief analysis of where you think it needs
improvement; perhaps fedora-art-list isn't the best place (Fedora
wise),
perhaps fedora-desktop
Hi John,
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 09:15 -0500, John Baer wrote:
Diana and/or Mo,
(btw, Diana is out sick today)
I noticed on the First Boot screen there is an icon to the left of the
word Welcome. Where does it come from?
I saw Nicu already replied but
1. As a rule of thumb most artwork
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 12:38 -0500, John Baer wrote:
All,
I noted from the Artwork/ReleaseGraphics document the header image for
the Anaconda Splash and Progress page are the same. IMO if the each
page called it's own header graphic (could be the same if desired) it
would allow for
Hi,
After lots of feedback, bug fixing and testing of the beta live CD
announced 3 weeks ago, I'm pleased to announce the first official Fedora
live CD. This live CD is based on packages from the Fedora Core 6
(codenamed Zod) and Fedora Extras package collections and is such 100%
free software.
On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 03:45 -0500, Warren Togami wrote:
It appears that this sub-project is suffering from an intractable
difference of opinion. In such cases, issues must be escalated to the
Fedora Project Board for a decision of how to move forward. The FPB has
asked Max to deal with
Mike Chalmers wrote:
There is no way you can say the Red Hat's colors are natural if you
think about it. You can't just name any color and say it is natural
because it looks like red on trees. There is a big difference.
I really agree here. The Fedora artwork is nice sure, but it really
don't
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 12:01 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
Hello,
It seems to me that there is no command line acpi client in fedora core.
If I'm not wrong, maybe acpitool (that I packaged in extras) could be moved
to core? It has more functionalities than the other client I found, acpi
(that
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 17:05 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
It can stay in Extras, it is just a proposition. But it may be interesting
to have a command line acpi client, even for non-experts, but for those
who have a basic use of the command line. Using an abstraction layer with
hal seems
30 matches
Mail list logo
