Re: Anyone have Java working with Chromium

* Patrick O'Callaghan [2009-12-02 06:06]: > I've been using the Chromium browser under F12 on my netbook for several > days, and generally like it a lot (especially on the small screen). It's > fast and doesn't eat RAM like Firefox. > > *But* Java sites don't work. This is a known bug with Linux

Re: Java applets not starting F-9 , firefox-3

* Per Anton Rønning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-22 14:40]: > Ed Greshko wrote: >> Per Anton Rønning wrote: >>> Ed Greshko wrote: >>> ..snip.. > > Also in reply to Ed: > There are two web-pages (both for interactive currency trading): > 1) http://www.cbfx.com and Do y

Re: Why can't I select the Sun Java VM ?

* Tom Horsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-30 11:54]: > On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:40:34 -0500 > Linuxguy123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > How do I get the Sun java to be the default Java, without doing a 24 > > step build that Googling finds ? > > Somewhere out in the world is a package that actu

Re: F11x64 and Java Web Start = Nada...?

* Christopher A. Williams [2009-07-13 10:02]: > I have a friend we just installed F11 (64-bit) for. They need to use an > application which requires Java Web Start (IcedTea Web Start?) > > Problem: This simply isn't working. the .jnlp file asks to load IcedTea > Web Start and then does absolutely

Re: Does Iced Tea Web Start work on Fedora 10? What about Fedora 11?

* Gianluca Sforna [2009-07-13 03:31]: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Rick Sewill wrote: > > Step 2 - Complete your setup fails when I use Iced Tea Web Start on > > Fedora 10.  I click Configuration Room to test my connection, the > > web page changes to a web page with, "Launching Elluminate L

Re: Does Iced Tea Web Start work on Fedora 10? What about Fedora 11?

* Christopher A. Williams [2009-07-13 15:47]: > On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 13:27 -0500, Rick Sewill wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 13:51 -0400, Deepak Bhole wrote: > > > * Gianluca Sforna [2009-07-13 03:31]: > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Rick Sewill wrot

Re: Java plugin stopped working.

* Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-04 10:42]: > I'm using 2.22.2 of ephipany and my java plugin seems to have stopped working > presumably as a result of a recent update > (nspluginwrapper-1.1.2.2.fc9.x86_64?). > > If I go to this site: > > http://www.javatester.org/index.html > > then sele

Re: Java plugin stopped working.

* Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-05 13:30]: > > Deepak Bhole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-04 10:42]: > > > I'm using 2.22.2 of ephipany and my java plugin seems to have stopped > > &

Re: Java plugin stopped working.

* Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-05 14:44]: > > Deepak Bhole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-05 13:30]: > > > > > > Deepak Bhole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > * Steve <

Re: Java plugin stopped working. [SOLVED]

* Andrew Overholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-06 10:44]: > * Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-06 10:30]: > > > > Andrew Overholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > * Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-11-06 09:03]: > > > > I did some experiments and I was able to reproduce the same problem if

Re: java alternatives

* anonymous [2009-04-16 16:36]: > Hello, > > I'm running Fedora 10 and recently installed the Sun Java JDK 6_13 using the > alternatives command. > It works fine, including the plugin, but I really don't get the > synchronization > process as discussed in the manual. If I issue the command > $

Re: java alternatives

* Ian Malone [2009-04-20 16:16]: > 2009/4/19 Andrew Overholt : > > * Ian Malone [2009-04-18 19:12]: > >> 2009/4/17 Deepak Bhole : > >> > >> > > >> > PS: Out of curiosity.. why do you need the Sun VM? Is something lacking > >> &g