On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Didar Hossaindidar.hoss...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Frank Chiullifrankc.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
On F11 when exim attempts to retrieve mail from my ISP, I get the following:
How are you pulling the mail from your ISP?
Summary:
SELinux
On F11 when exim attempts to retrieve mail from my ISP, I get the following:
Summary:
SELinux is preventing exim (exim_t) getattr boot_t.
Detailed Description:
SELinux denied access requested by exim. It is not expected that this
access is required by exim and this access may signal an intrusion
I recently installed F11 over F10. Everything appears to be working
just fine. However, I just remembered that Mike McGrath had sent out
an email about settings for IPTables that he wanted everyone to use.
Unfortunately, I did not bookmark the page. I did try the
Infrastructure SOPs
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Ricky Zhouri...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 2009-08-13 11:59:35 AM, Frank Chiulli wrote:
I recently installed F11 over F10. Everything appears to be working
just fine. However, I just remembered that Mike McGrath had sent out
an email about settings
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:34 AM, Daniel J Walshdwa...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/26/2009 05:45 PM, Frank Chiulli wrote:
Sorry for the delay in responding. I've been on the road and unable
to access my Fedora box. So after a little grief with SELinux and
permissions I have a log file of exim
of the file that I could post?
Frank
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:37 AM, Gordon Messmeryiny...@eburg.com wrote:
On 07/14/2009 07:33 PM, Frank Chiulli wrote:
Here's what I did:
- as root, I ran '/etc/init.d/exim stop'
- as root, I ran 'exim -bd -d+all/tmp/ex.file 21'
- as a normal user, I ran
Hornejohn.ho...@plymouth.ac.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 13:05 -0700, Frank Chiulli wrote:
Nigel,
No reference to boot in the exim.conf. That was one of the first
things that I checked.
Could there be a redirection (e.g. via /etc/aliases) or a .forward file
referring to /boot somewhere on your
Didar,
Mail is arriving. I just get one SELinux message for every mail message.
I agree...exim should not be referencing /boot AFAIK. But I'm not an expert.
Frank
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Didar Hossaindidar.hoss...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Frank
Probably should have posted to this list first.
Frank
-- Forwarded message --
From: Frank Chiulli frankc.fed...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:17 AM
Subject: Re: exim: SELinux
To: Didar Hossain didar.hoss...@gmail.com
Cc: Fedora Infrastructure fedora-infrastructure-l
, 2009-07-13 at 05:17 -0700, Frank Chiulli wrote:
Didar,
Mail is arriving. I just get one SELinux message for every mail message.
I agree...exim should not be referencing /boot AFAIK. But I'm not an expert.
Frank
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Didar Hossaindidar.hoss...@gmail.com
wrote
Nigel,
No reference to boot in the exim.conf. That was one of the first
things that I checked.
Frank
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 6:06 AM, Nigel
Metheringhamnigel.methering...@dev.intechnology.co.uk wrote:
On 13 Jul 2009, at 13:17, Frank Chiulli wrote:
Mail is arriving. I just get one SELinux
subj=unconfined_u:system_r:exim_t:s0 key=(null)
Frank
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Daniel J Walshdwa...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/13/2009 08:24 AM, Frank Chiulli wrote:
I realized that just before I received your email and did post to
fedora-list. My mistake and thanks for the heads up.
Frank
This is a recently installed/patched F11 system. It was a fresh
install to one disk leaving my home directory untouched on another
disk. Today, I installed exim and removed sendmail via yum at the
command line. I am using the same exim.conf file that I had used with
F10 after having compared it
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Just a reminder for you to all check your infrastructure tickets. If you
are working on them, great. If not, unset them so we know and can assign
them to someone else:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Frank Chiulli frankc.fed...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm not running samba. If I put the following rule before the LOG
rule, will the packets be dropped and the messages stopped
So I've implemented the CSI (Security Policy) as previously posted by Mike
(http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/csi/security-policy/en-US/html-singel/)
Now I'm seeing the following messages in /var/log/messages:
Jan 31 19:09:21 localhost kernel: FW-REJECT IN=eth0 OUT=
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 7:59 PM, seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 21:30 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Frank Chiulli wrote:
So I've implemented the CSI (Security Policy) as previously posted by Mike
(http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey all. I've placed our security policy CSI docs in a standard location
now. Just a reminder: If you have shell access on any of our servers you
need to be compliant with all of these rules by the end of March. Which
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Frank Chiulli frankc.fed...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009, Mike McGrath wrote:
This isn't really required but it's my intention to implement these
policies (or what we come
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009, Mike McGrath wrote:
This isn't really required but it's my intention to implement these
policies (or what we come to after some discussion). This is targeted
_ONLY_ at this team and those with shell
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Chris Tyler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This list, fedora-list@redhat.com, is one of the first lists that most
Fedora users join, and therefore quite important to the community.
However, it's a high-volume list (and is sometimes perceived to have a
high noise
Should the password migration associated with FAS2 be complete by now?
I still have to use my old password on publictest1.
Frank
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Mike McGrath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In our efforts to track down https://bugzilla.redhat.com/429459 I've
disabled all iscsi on xen2. Some of those guests have been moved
elsewhere, and some of them have been converted to local storage.
Please do not
My system is running Fedora 8 and is up-to-date.
I have an HP Deskjet 932C printer attached to a Hawking HPS12U print
server on the network.
I've configured the printer using system-config-printer.
I set the printer mode to be draft.
I can print a short simple text file. But it prints
I've accepted this ticket.
The first thing I did was look for any Fedora packages (repoquery);
but came up empty.
Next, I tried Source Forge. A query for 'poll' yielded 70 results.
None of these are written in Python. AFAIK Python is not a
requirement.
I've downloaded and am testing the first
On Jan 8, 2008 8:26 AM, Matt Domsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 11:23:25AM -0500, Luke Macken wrote:
So, we still have a handful of FC6 guests lying around in PHX.
After a quick look, it seems that we're using them for the following
services.
publictest1
-
Hi,
My name is Frank and I would like to volunteer to help.
I've already traded a few emails with Mike McGrath. He suggested that I send
a short introduction the list. So here it is.
I am 58 years old. I have been writing software for about 37 years
professionally - longer if you count
27 matches
Mail list logo
