On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 8:29 AM, John Aldrich wrote:
It's all there in the GUI, and it's completely configurable. Nothing is
forced down on you, AFAIK.
That's true. However, it *defaults* to LVM.
i.e., users who did not change the defaults/do not know the
implications of the defaults/do not
That was definitely informative. Thanks for the explanations.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
No, we should patch the broken packages to work with the current Mono.Cecil.
And upstream deserves a beating for this attitude. :-/ Why am I not
surprised this is coming from the M$-loving Mono community?
Shouldn't Fedora take upstream's design into account? It's their
software, after all.
How to I get Skype to use my USB webcams mic ?
GNOME should allow you to choose which device for speaker input.
Doesn't the webcam mike show up under Sound Properties (right click on
speaker in bar)?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
*Why* do I get so much more info about Gnome apps than KDE ones,
*who* could change that, and *where* can I make the request and expect it
to be on topic?
All this technical mumbo-jumbo aside. Basically, it's because GNOME
treats the KDE apps unfairly.
Yes, it's lame. Yes, it's a known
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Eric Mesa wrote:
THANK YOU SO MUCH for the info on how to fix PulseAudio. My ears have been
blasted to the point of pain when using my ear-covering studio headphones
and Fedora suddenly decided to go full volume on a rock song. I will
implement your fix when I
Thanks!
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
My Hewlett-Packard printer-scanner-copier 1210 auto-detected and
installed automatically just fine in Fedora 11.
In 12, it says can't find driver for HP Series 1200 PSC or somesuch.
Clicking search on the alert shows the giant vendor list of
drivers, and sure enough, the HP PSC drivers stop at
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Rudolf Kastl writes:
intel (i965) works fine...
You are lucky. Major regressions there in F-12. On my hardware, this used to
work when nomodeset was passed to kernel. Now, it doesn't any more. With KMS,
on
the other hand,
For the Qt-demo rendering issue on intel, it is fixed by Qt 4.6.
Good to hear!
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
It doesn't seem to be included from my LiveCD installation of Fedora
12. PackageKit returns no queries for recorder related to the GNOME
desktop, and of course Multimedia category and sound queries are too
large to search manually.
A yum search sound | grep recorder also returns nothing.
--
I have two sound cards installed: one onboard and another PCI.
The PCI, the one I do no use very much, works fine. The onboard
is the one which does not save the volumes. Every time I call an application
its master and pcm volume go to the maximum (I see the sliders going to the
top
in
Can't vanilla QEMU do virtualization with only user privileges and no
formal installation? Don't know if it would be useful, but maybe an
interesting experiment.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
I assumed, via the release notes, that the new Xorg operates in
extend-desktop mode by default.
However, I'm not sure.
When I hook up a running Fedora laptop to a projector, my desktop is
extended. Very nice.
When I hook up the same projector and then -boot- my Fedora laptop, I
am set to
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
This is intentional. Plymouth is rendering the same boot animation on
all heads; not sure we can do much better.
Oh, I don't mind that at all. That's awesome. I understand that
clone mode is excellent for Plymouth.
But after Fedora
Oh, I misunderstood. Yeah, it should remember the previous configuration
you had with this combination of outputs. This information is stored in
~/.config/monitors.xml.
Right. I guess what I'm saying is...it doesn't seem to.
The very first time I booted my laptop with this (800x600)
Please pardon my answering everyone in one email.
To Adam: I have not used my BIOS. The Intel 965 card on my Toshiba
laptop has no BIOS options. I can't even change the default scaling
from full-panel to off. It's really sad.
The OS has to do everything in this laptop, since the BIOS
lt;clonegt;yeslt;/clonegt; line. Every config (including for the
800x600 projector) sets clone to no.
Sorry for the bad escape code. I meant there are no
cloneyes/clone lines at all.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
so, um, you didn't read it, then. =) he simply suggested connecting the
external monitor at grub stage rather than having it plugged in at BIOS
stage, to see if that made a difference.
Oh, curses! Right, sorry about that. When I go back
I have heard about that, but as a non-evolution it isn't interesting for me.
How about you ? Want to contribute to the Fedora community and learn a
little a packaging software for a distro ?
I'm not sure I understand. Are you saying it's not an actual Evolution plugin?
I can't help package
Hey. Two problems when using Rhythmbox's UPNP plugin.
1. How can I open up the Fedora firewall correctly? I've seen posts
that in forums (eg. Ubuntu) that say open port UDP-1900, but I tried
this and I still can't see my friends in the network (as opposed to
firewall-off, when I can see them
Hello all.
I see on the internet that there is a utility to decode
TNEF/(Microsoft Outlook)-type email attachments. The utility
(library?) looks like its available in Fedora.
However, there is a separate Evolution plugin that appears to be
upstream (since GNOME 2.12 [1]). This plugin doesn't
In F12, the GNOME Help Program (I think it's called Yelp, now?) shows
an error when trying to access Help in either Nautilus or Evolution.
Do these programs not have help available? Or has it simply not been
packaged for the F12 beta?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
This is unfortunately not actually a helpful topic, but I am deathly curious.
Will GNOME be stuck at 2.26 for the rest of the F11 cycle? Or are
updates in the works, just not ready yet?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
@Judd, wait for the F12 release, it's the best 'update' and it is not ready
yet!
I hope so. I'm not sure anything can top Fedora 8. Hard to explain
how much I enjoyed that distribution.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
in theory what you suggest should work. but I've certainly had plenty
of cases where for reasons unknown to me I couldn't browse to a
particular machine or share, but could manually mount it just fine.
I second this. I have -never- gotten Windows Network browsing to work
reliably, under
But it has to be said that Windows networking can be a nightmare in its
native environment. After fault finding other people's systems, I've
reached the conclusion that it's been badly designed, and never sensibly
fixed up.
I'd agree with this almost completely, with about one exception:
F11's Brasero has had some serious bugs (it started out fine, but
updates made it worse). You could try updating to the newest Brasero
in Rawhide.
yum update --enablerepo=rawhide brasero
That might work. You could also try running F12, which uses the
newest version of Brasero as well and has
beyond the standard virt support, is it worth looking at
IOMMU support? (intel calls it VT-d, while AMD calls it AMD-Vi. are
laptops shipping with that feature these days? is it immediately
useful?)
As for VT-d and AMD-Vi, I believe these -are- the standard hardware
virtualization support.
beyond the standard virt support, is it worth looking at
IOMMU support? (intel calls it VT-d, while AMD calls it AMD-Vi.
Yes, that looks right. IOMMU -is- VT-d.
AIUI, standard HW virt support is AMD-V for AMD, and VT-x
for intel. above and beyond that, you have what *used*
to be called
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
AFAICT, the native LLVM backends don't have that problem. The real problem
with C++ is that Clang's C++ support is experimental and incomplete, so
you're stuck with llvm-g++.
I thought that C doesn't have any crazy name or symbol or
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 3:19 AM, Rahul Sundaram
sunda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Yes. Development releases of Fedora have a large number of debugging
stuff enabled.
I really can't tell if you're joking.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Actually, the ABI issue is only if you use the C code generator, not the
native ones.
I'm not sure I understand. How can LLVM-C be ABI-incompatible with plain GCC-C?
I thought that C doesn't have any crazy name or
I suppose at least this does work even if upstream policy is not to make this
available - however for a newbie just installing F11 and wanting this
available
it is not obvious from install notes or release notes as far as I remember?
It's important to note...
The reason why you can't
What about using LVM to store a pre-update snapshot of your distro?
(Separate root partition from /home and other stuff, of course. Roll
back root).
Highly inconvenient, but it would theoretically work...
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed,
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
Newer builds with patches, reverted code with epoch, newer upstream release to
fix the mistake upstream, etc.. To say that there is no way to fix a
mistake is insulting.
I'd like to logic-link here with the following...
On Wed, Oct 14,
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Jud Craft wrote:
They both suffer from the same problem -- new packages may cause
changes in data that are not reversibly compatible with the old
package, and mere package rollback is not useful.
Of course, I imagine that any rollback system that doesn't
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
There's no perfect.
we're just going for 'good enough', really.
Ah, so package-rollback is shipped as the halfway-effective crutch,
but it's so easy to implement we might as well offer it anyway
solution.
Or, the excellent implementation of
, automount doesn't do the unmount and remount
for each user part. If someone corrects me I will gladly appreciate
it, but for now I am very happy with my script.
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Ed Greshkoed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
Jud Craft wrote:
It doesn't help to be members of the group/GID
It is very true that I did not want to do my own research. I wanted
to summon the exact answer I needed from someone else's mind.
Rediscovery was something I did not want to waste time on. Of
laziness, I stand guilty.
Genuinely, thanks for the posts though. Bookmarked, I'll be sure to
give
I know that NTFS is pretty much as functional as FAT32 is.
But I don't think that NTFS supports Linux users and groups on Linux. Does it?
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Timignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 20:47 -0400, Jud Craft wrote:
Since I'm using this partition
.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Ed Greshkoed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
Jud Craft wrote:
It automatically mounts a drive that contains my Desktop directory.
Hence, I need it to work before nautilus does.
It specifically is a per-user mount, so I can't have it globally
automount
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Ed Greshkoed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
One thing I forgot to mention
I prefer to solve problems with standard tools than specialized scripts
that need to be maintained.
I totally agree. But the FAT32-user limitation is built into GNOME,
so that's not
On 08/18/2009 01:18 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Jud Craft wrote:
I would like to run a script at login, but before gnome-panel and
nautilus-desktop are launched (after gnome-session is okay, of
course).
Is there a place in the login/startup process that I can do this?
With Gnome's Startup
On 08/21/2009 12:22 AM, Jud Craft wrote:
So X session scripts are a no-go. Just have to poke around some more, I
guess.
From the GNOME.org wiki:
http://live.gnome.org/SessionManagement/NewGnomeSession
Mentions the new startup paradigm, where you specify a phase
(Initialization
I would like to run a script at login, but before gnome-panel and
nautilus-desktop are launched (after gnome-session is okay, of
course).
Is there a place in the login/startup process that I can do this?
With Gnome's Startup Applications, a script is not guaranteed to be
executed before the rest
/18 Jud Craft craft...@gmail.com:
I would like to run a script at login, but before gnome-panel and
nautilus-desktop are launched (after gnome-session is okay, of
course).
Is there a place in the login/startup process that I can do this?
With Gnome's Startup Applications, a script
On 08/16/2009 09:28 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
There is on may machine, as well as an option Open with other
Application. This is in Gnome.
Well darn. Are you sure? This is mine. Sorry for the attachment.
I don't have a Open With tab for folders. On my machine (running
GNOME but with some
On 08/16/2009 09:51 AM, Garry T. Williams wrote:
On Sunday 16 August 2009 00:15:59 Tim wrote:
Windows users...hoping...doing the exact same thing over and over
will generate a different result.
That's insane.
What really blows your mind is that sometimes, it -ACTUALLY DOES-.
--
On 08/16/2009 11:05 AM, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 16 August 2009 14:38:56 Jud Craft wrote:
On 08/16/2009 09:28 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
There is on may machine, as well as an option Open with other
Application. This is in Gnome.
Well darn. Are you sure? This is mine. Sorry
On 08/14/2009 06:45 AM, Tim wrote:
On your desktop, or in a file browser, right-click on a folder, open the
properties for it, and change the open-with preference to something more
sensible.
No can do.
Under current F11 GNOME 2.26.3, when you open Properties on a Folder,
there is no Open
All docks currently in existence require a composited screen. They
all are designed to mimic the animation-heavy OS X dock.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:16 AM, S P Arif Sahari
Wibowoarifs...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi!
I am looking for an application which can function as applications dock
(combined
I misspoke. WindowMaker's Dock indeed fulfills all your requirements.
However, I thought you did not want WindowMaker.
As for AWN dock, GNOME Do docky, they require compositing.
Most of these OS X dock type applications all require a composited screen.
However -- a quick google reveals that
This command looks like it will ask for your root password, and then
it will install or update the VMWare Player package.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Nathan
Huangnathan.vorbei.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys
who can tell me what does this syntax mean?
su -c 'rpm -Uvh /path to
You could try yum reinstalling PulseAudio.
If you had tried a fresh install of F11 on a small side partition, you
could figure out whether F11 sound is the problem or my upgrade
was the problem, since Fedora upgrades seem to have bugs of their own
quite often, and the Linux sound infrastructure
environment, or tell you immediately if it was futile.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Linuxguy123linuxguy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 17:21 -0500, Jud Craft wrote:
You could try yum reinstalling PulseAudio.
If you had tried a fresh install of F11 on a small side partition, you
The VNC packages in F11 actually use TigerVNC. TigerVNC is based on
RealVNC, so they just dropped in the program and didn't change the
names.
There is no plain Tightvnc or Realvnc in F11 -- the TigerVNC package
just uses the generic vncserver and vncviewer names.
The VNC packaging is definitely
Try posting this to the fedora-font list too.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Andy Wangdope...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I posted this on fedoraforum.org when I was testing the preview F11
and just did again to see if anyone using F11 release has any ideas,
but I thought I'd try the mailing
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Matthew Garrettm...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 05:48:44PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
You have to tell us what we need to change in KDE and give us the necessary
time to adapt, even if it means you have to wait for Fedora 13 to push this
change.
Darn straight. I stand corrected.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Adam Jacksona...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 13:42 -0500, Jud Craft wrote:
Fedora's deployment of that work, however, is another matter. Does
Fedora offer a variety of environments with a set of common features
I think the Fedora release notes mention that if you run the tool
system-config-display, it will automatically generate an xorg.conf for
you.
From the Common F11 Bugs, under Miscellaneous problems with Intel
graphics adapters :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F11_bugs#intel-misc-gfx
Maybe Red Hat's site could do that cool video tag wrapping trick
that uses HTML-video by default, then falls back to flash if not
present?
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 3:07 AM, Richard Hugheshughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 5:20 AM, Robert Wuestrwues...@wuest.org wrote:
A
Besides the fact that Skype is closed source, I was under the
impression that the idea of distributed voice transmission was an
advantage.
Shouldn't a ideal communication system have no single point of failure
(or a country club of them, ala a group of ISP servers?)
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:51
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
David Tardon wrote:
Let me try another analogy: How do you handle health problems?
You'll visit your doctor. You'll expect him to identify the problem and
to take appropriate steps to solve your issue--that may well
Kevin seems to be distraught over the possibility that his friends
might be able, through pressure, to force him into a choice of using a
system he doesn't like, or not being in touch with people.
Skype is a proprietary social service. The only pressure to use it is
a social one, which isn't to
Ekiga is an open-source voice chat solution. However, it does not use
the Skype network.
There is also Empathy, which supports voice chat and can do basic IM
functions, like Pidgin.
I have not used either of these, so consumer beware. I would give
Empathy a shot first; Fedora and Ubuntu have
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Contacts for Skype are stored on their servers. All you need to do is
install skype and sign in with your userid and password to get your
contacts.
Perhaps they are talking about transferring contacts between Skype
Hey there. Installed F11 preview, really like it. Intel 965GM
graphics card, by the way.
When I first set it up, I was delighted to find that plymouth and the
new graphical boot splash, Compiz, and redirected direct rendering all
work perfectly. I was very glad that at least for my card model,
That's awesome, thanks. So run those commands and that should do it.
By doing a find / * | grep plymouth I found the plymouth README in
/usr/share/doc/plymouth, and it also turned up a list of my themes in
/usr/share/plymouth/themes.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To
I used to install both NoScript and Flashblock myself.
The reason? Even when I trust a site, I still don't want it loading
Flash whenever it wants. Bogs down my browsing. So even when I trust
a site, Flashblock keeps the extra flash games and ads from running,
unless I want it to.
I
No, I mean I know how to do a net installation. Just did one last
night. But I wanted to point out that it's very difficult to find the
net-installation-only image. That install guide doesn't actually
mention where to find the minimal net install image.
And for some, there's a huge difference
Ah. So they are. Whoops.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Forgive me. You do not understand what I am saying.
I know well that the 128MB boot.iso exists -- and in Fedora 10 it is
called netinst.iso.
My complaint is that I wish Fedora made it easy to _find it_. None of
the posts so far, nor Fedora's website, have actually told me where to
find the
I apologize for my sarcasm. It is frustrating when you feel misunderstood.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Todd's idea was my general thought -- at least put it on the page with
the big list of stuff.
Mike wrote...
That being said, it wasn't all that difficult to find...
Your ease in finding it depends a lot on your familiarity with the structure.
Consider that you had to realize which numbered
Hey there.
I've been looking for the netinst.iso for Fedora 10. I can't find it
anywhere on fedoraproject's download page, and there is no information
on where to find it in either the Installation Guide or the Release
notes.
I did eventually manage to find it by picking a random mirror and
76 matches
Mail list logo
