Re: Local users get to play root?

2009-11-19 Thread Keith G. Robertson-Turner
). -- Regards, Keith G. Robertson-Turner -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Local users get to play root?

2009-11-18 Thread Keith G. Robertson-Turner
advisories now? -- Regards, Keith G. Robertson-Turner -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Local users get to play root?

2009-11-18 Thread Keith G. Robertson-Turner
G. Robertson-Turner -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Local users get to play root?

2009-11-18 Thread Keith G. Robertson-Turner
many assumptions. Stack overflow. -- Regards, Keith G. Robertson-Turner -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Re: Local users get to play root?

2009-11-18 Thread Keith G. Robertson-Turner
fall. It was pushed. Maybe people are tired of bagging tea and want new things to be outraged about. Yes, maybe complaining about the subversion of 40 years of UNIX security is being somewhat petty. -- Regards, Keith G. Robertson-Turner -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list

Re: Local users get to play root?

2009-11-18 Thread Keith G. Robertson-Turner
Verily I say unto thee, that Rahul Sundaram spake thusly: On 11/19/2009 11:51 AM, Keith G. Robertson-Turner wrote: Error: Too many assumptions. Stack overflow. Yes, you are making too many assumptions Where? -- Regards, Keith G. Robertson-Turner -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora

Re: Acrobat repo for FC10?

2009-09-13 Thread Keith G. Robertson-Turner
this the hard way. Why not just stick with the Free tools already available? -- Regards, Keith G. Robertson-Turner -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate

Re: Announcement: New repo with updated ClamAV packages for Fedora 8

2008-07-28 Thread Keith G. Robertson-Turner
. -- Regards, Keith G. Robertson-Turner -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Re: Announcement: New repo with updated ClamAV packages for Fedora 8

2008-07-28 Thread Keith G. Robertson-Turner
Verily I say unto thee, that Keith G. Robertson-Turner spake thusly: Meanwhile I recommend you simply remove klamav and try again, until I rebuild it and publish it to the repo (hopefully in the next hour or so). Klamav (KDE GUI for clamav) is now in the repo: http://rpm.slated.org/fedora/7

Re: Announcement: New repo with updated ClamAV packages for Fedora 8

2008-07-27 Thread Keith G. Robertson-Turner
Verily I say unto thee, that Erik P. Olsen spake thusly: On 27/07/08 03:53, Keith G. Robertson-Turner wrote: Verily I say unto thee, that Bob Marcan spake thusly: (Original subject: clamav 0.93 on Fedora 8) Will this ever happen ? For some reason the Fedora 8 packages for ClamAV

Re: Announcement: New repo with updated ClamAV packages for Fedora 8

2008-07-27 Thread Keith G. Robertson-Turner
Verily I say unto thee, that Rahul Sundaram spake thusly: Keith G. Robertson-Turner wrote: Also I'm still investigating the legality of building unrar against GPL sources. I think this is not a question of whether the author gives his permission to distribute freeware, but more a question

Announcement: New repo with updated ClamAV packages for Fedora 8

2008-07-26 Thread Keith G. Robertson-Turner
in this repo (just up a few minutes ago), but I may be providing other packages in the near future. * Sat Jul 26 2008 Keith G. Robertson-Turner fedora[AT]slated.org - 0.93.3-2 - - Rebuilt for Fedora 8 - - Enabled RAR support Note: RAR support means this package is proprietary (freeware), although express

Red Hat's isthereachoice.com ... hosted on Windows?

2007-11-17 Thread Keith G. Robertson-Turner
http://digg.com/linux_unix/Red_Hat_s_IS_THERE_A_CHOICE_Uses_WINDOWS_No_choice Oh the irony :) This slightly embarrassing, and not very good PR. -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

Push Poll asking some odd questions about Red Hat

2007-10-24 Thread Keith G. Robertson-Turner
Has Red Hat commissioned a poll from Penn, Schoen Berland Ass. Inc.?: http://www.mit.edu/~mherdeg/pushpoll/ If not, then who is it that's paying for this Red Hat marketing data, and why is it implying there's about to be a patent cross-licensing agreement between Red Hat and Microsoft? Is