).
--
Regards,
Keith G. Robertson-Turner
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
advisories now?
--
Regards,
Keith G. Robertson-Turner
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
G. Robertson-Turner
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
many assumptions. Stack overflow.
--
Regards,
Keith G. Robertson-Turner
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
fall.
It was pushed.
Maybe people are tired of bagging tea and want new things to be
outraged about.
Yes, maybe complaining about the subversion of 40 years of UNIX security
is being somewhat petty.
--
Regards,
Keith G. Robertson-Turner
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list
Verily I say unto thee, that Rahul Sundaram spake thusly:
On 11/19/2009 11:51 AM, Keith G. Robertson-Turner wrote:
Error: Too many assumptions. Stack overflow.
Yes, you are making too many assumptions
Where?
--
Regards,
Keith G. Robertson-Turner
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora
this the hard way.
Why not just stick with the Free tools already available?
--
Regards,
Keith G. Robertson-Turner
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate
.
--
Regards,
Keith G. Robertson-Turner
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Verily I say unto thee, that Keith G. Robertson-Turner spake thusly:
Meanwhile I recommend you simply remove klamav and try again, until I
rebuild it and publish it to the repo (hopefully in the next hour or
so).
Klamav (KDE GUI for clamav) is now in the repo:
http://rpm.slated.org/fedora/7
Verily I say unto thee, that Erik P. Olsen spake thusly:
On 27/07/08 03:53, Keith G. Robertson-Turner wrote:
Verily I say unto thee, that Bob Marcan spake thusly:
(Original subject: clamav 0.93 on Fedora 8)
Will this ever happen ?
For some reason the Fedora 8 packages for ClamAV
Verily I say unto thee, that Rahul Sundaram spake thusly:
Keith G. Robertson-Turner wrote:
Also I'm still investigating the legality of building unrar against
GPL sources. I think this is not a question of whether the author
gives his permission to distribute freeware, but more a question
in this repo (just up a few minutes
ago), but I may be providing other packages in the near future.
* Sat Jul 26 2008 Keith G. Robertson-Turner fedora[AT]slated.org -
0.93.3-2
- - Rebuilt for Fedora 8
- - Enabled RAR support
Note: RAR support means this package is proprietary (freeware), although
express
http://digg.com/linux_unix/Red_Hat_s_IS_THERE_A_CHOICE_Uses_WINDOWS_No_choice
Oh the irony :)
This slightly embarrassing, and not very good PR.
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
Has Red Hat commissioned a poll from Penn, Schoen Berland Ass. Inc.?:
http://www.mit.edu/~mherdeg/pushpoll/
If not, then who is it that's paying for this Red Hat marketing data,
and why is it implying there's about to be a patent cross-licensing
agreement between Red Hat and Microsoft?
Is
14 matches
Mail list logo