On Monday 11 May 2009 11:18:53 Craig White wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 07:44 -0700, Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
Craig White wrote:
try...
RedirectPermanent /svn/ https://host.domain.com/svn
Craig
Thanks, but it does not work:
$ svn list
On Monday 11 May 2009 11:40:05 Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
Jim wrote:
Thanks Kevin for your help on this.
Can I change a ext3 partition (sda1) with data on it to raid 0 or do I
have to do a fresh install ?
Look at the raid tools like mdadm. I'm pretty sure you can (mdadm
--assemble?),
On Monday 11 May 2009 12:18:47 Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
Then that would mean that my normal website for anonymous users
would be forced use https when it is not required?
As it is, I could just drop the VirtualHost host.domain.com:80
code block for subversion and who cares if subversion
On Sunday 10 May 2009 18:04:35 Jim wrote:
I have a EeePC 1000 with two SSD drives and Fedora 10.
I want to make / partition larger
sda1 / 8gb
sdb1 /home 32gb
I want to make /home 20gb
I want to make / 20gb
I have made sdb1 /home 20gb with Gparted and I made with the
unallocated space
On Sunday 10 May 2009 18:30:50 Patrick W. Barnes wrote:
VirtualHost host.domain.com:80
ServerName host.domain.com
...
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule ^/$ https://host.domain.com/ [R,L]
RewriteRule ^/(.*) https://host.domain.com/$1 [R,L]
/VirtualHost
Forgot to mention
On Sunday 10 May 2009 19:26:51 Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
DRAT! TYPO!
Should be:
VirtualHost host.domain.com:80
ServerName host.domain.com
CustomLog /svn/Admin/logs/access.log combined
ErrorLog /svn/Admin/logs/error.log
SSLProxyEngine on
ProxyPass /
On Friday 16 February 2007, Karsten Wade wrote:
Now I've provided some of step 2., the outside perspective. What do you
think about the rest?
I have already posted against the idea of merging the two lists before,
expressing some of the same concerns.
Inspired by Karsten's message, I have
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2048117,00.asp
--
Patrick The N-Man Barnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://n-man.com/
LinkedIn:
http://linkedin.com/in/nman64
Have I been helpful? Rate my assistance!
http://rate.affero.net/nman64/
--
pgpDPw0mLAzIE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
On Sunday 01 October 2006 13:06, Stephen Buccola wrote:
I'm fairly new to Linux and chose to download Fedora Core 5. I'm currently
installing a program, PCMIA, and it asks me to locate my kernel source
directory. I was under the impression that it could be found under
/usr/src/linux, however,
On Monday 16 October 2006 09:34, Jeffrey Tadlock wrote:
Patrick W. Barnes wrote:
Just preceding this message is the latest wave of end-user messages
delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] These are usually simple end-user
questions that need simple answers. RTFM-type messages are unacceptable
On Thursday 03 August 2006 22:07, Bill Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Fedora Project wiki is currently down. We are working to
resolve the issue.
Apologies for the inconvenience.
A hardware failure was the cause of the problem. We have restored the site
from a recent backup and
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 17:40, Rahul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Now this is closer than a earlier report
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-6100569.html
This one is less specific to Fedora but was inspired by it.
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-6100569.html
--
Patrick The N-Man
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 10:32, Rahul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick W. Barnes wrote:
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 17:40, Rahul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Now this is closer than a earlier report
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-6100569.html
This one is less specific
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 09:37, Máirín Duffy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
So anyway -- a couple of practical questions:
1. Who's the maintainer of the fedora-women-list? Is it a woman, and if
not, can we make it a woman?
I believe Patrick is. I wouldn't mind
In an effort to support the women who use and develop Fedora, the Fedora Women
program was launched last week. This new program provides a forum for
communication between the women of Fedora, and it will eventually offer
additional support to the women that help make Fedora what it is.
The
On Sunday 16 July 2006 04:06, Rahul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The article revealed that many distributions' maintainers were
erroneously assuming that they did not need to provide source
repositories for packages they did not modify, so long as the original
upstream distribution did provide
On Sunday 16 July 2006 12:55, Dimitris Glezos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
O/H Rahul έγραψε:
I think we should make it trivially easy to rebrand Fedora and look at
colloborating with derivative distributions.The form of colloboration
is not necessarily any sort of legal or business agreements
On Saturday 17 June 2006 02:08, Chitlesh GOORAH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I would like to remember the exitence of Fedora Linux group on Flickr:
- http://koolinus.wordpress.com/2006/04/12/fedora-at-flickr/
- http://www.flickr.com/groups/fedora/
I would like to remind those who are using
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 05:17, Naoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't flame me, just making an observation and voicing an opinion ( and
we all know about those ).
I typed the following terms into google and hit I'm feeling Lucky and
this is what I felt about the results..
...
fedora -
On Sunday 28 May 2006 01:59, Máirín Duffy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be fair about the PSD format wiki design mockups You need to
show/hide layers in that PSD to be able to view the entire design. An open
format that Photoshop can actually handle like PNG wouldn't work, right,
since it's
On Sunday 28 May 2006 07:30, Guillermo Gómez S. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Graphics Standard Manual confuses me regarding the Typeface of the logo.
It says it uses U001 fonts but not even in the manual they look as as
the logo.
What's the typeface font of the logo?
The U001 font is intended
On Saturday 27 May 2006 06:32, Guillermo Gómez S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, we have a contributor who posted a modified logo with fedora-ve
text in it.
Is it valid to do such modifications? I dont want to punish him but
certainly he has a point on localizing the logo somehow.
What's the
On Thursday 25 May 2006 10:50, Alex Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The new logo guidelines are out!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Logo
Please be sure not to violate any of the guidelines.
When you are designing wiki pages, please reference these common
design elements instead fo uploading
The following comment applies to everyone, not just Thijs:
PLEASE do not upload your entire address book (which may include
fedora-ambassadors-list or other Fedora addresses) to ANY third-party
service, and NEVER include ANY Fedora address when mass-mailing ANYTHING.
Aside from concerns over
On Thursday 18 May 2006 03:39, Gain Paolo Mureddu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's been a couple times now that I have sent a request for the Logo
just like what the current guidelines indicate, and have never got
back the said e-mail with either further instructions, questions or a
direct
On Thursday 18 May 2006 19:54, Gain Paolo Mureddu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My point was that Fedora is not free to distribute the whole logo (text
+ image) due to the fact that the font is not open or free, which seems
a bit strange for a FLOSS project.
We are completely free to
The Fedora Project is pleased to announce that it will be participating in
Google's Summer of Code 2006 as a mentoring organization. Working in
cooperation with Google and the permanent Fedora Mentors Project, the Fedora
Project will mentor students as they work to complete open source
On Friday 21 April 2006 05:07, Chitlesh GOORAH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From
http://en.opensuse.org/Frequently_Asked_Questions#Fedora_basically_forces_y
ou_to_update_to_the_newest_version_to_stay_current.2C_even_for_security_upda
tes._How_does_openSUSE_handle_this.3F
Fedora basically forces
28 matches
Mail list logo
