Hide the kittens and the babies, a message from your friendly KDE-SIG

-- = Steven M. Parrish - gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0 http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: SMParrish

Bug Triage workflow for F13 and beyond

these changes. Steven = Steven M. Parrish - gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0 http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/ IRC nick

Re: bug in fedora 11

a bug report that already addresses this, if not you can open one. That is the best way to get your issue to the appropriate people. Steven = Steven M. Parrish

Re: Looking for people who need guests.

= Steven M. Parrish - gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0 http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: SMParrish

Re: Whither KDELIBS-4.3?

= Steven M. Parrish - gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0 http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: SMParrish @ #fedora-kde, #fedora-devel

Re: Seeking comments on my proposal

On 08/18/2009 11:19 AM, Steven M. Parrish wrote: Got the outline of my proposal here https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SugarZilla I welcome any comments I dislike the idea of anonymous opening of bugs and anonymous commenting in bugzilla. It's not clear from the proposal if that's

Re: Wan't to join and why

Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On 08/17/2009 03:48 PM, Steven M. Parrish wrote: Hi guys and gals, I am looking to join both the sysadmin-test and sysadmin-cvs groups. Why you might ask? Well I'll tell you. I wan't to get more involved in Fedora. Here is my current Fedora resume

Re: Wan't to join and why

Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 08/18/2009 05:51 PM, Steven M. Parrish wrote: What I am looking to do now is create a very simplified bugzilla interface that can be used by OLPC users, mostly children, to report issues with Sugar Activities in Fedora. Will develop in PHP and would like

Re: Wan't to join and why

Paul W. Frields wrote: On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:15:48AM -0400, Steven M. Parrish wrote: Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 08/18/2009 05:51 PM, Steven M. Parrish wrote: What I am looking to do now is create a very simplified bugzilla interface that can be used by OLPC users, mostly children

Seeking comments on my proposal

Got the outline of my proposal here https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SugarZilla I welcome any comments Steven -- = Steven M. Parrish - gpg

Re: Seeking comments on my proposal

-- = Steven M. Parrish - gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0 http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net

Wan't to join and why

the cvs servers and projects contained there. Any questions just ask. = Steven M. Parrish - gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0

Re: [Fedora-livecd-list] No space left on device during image creation

the --tmpdir=dirname option when creating the image. Steven = Steven M. Parrish - gpg fingerprint: 4B6C 8357 059E B7ED 8095 0FD6 1F4B EDA0 A9A6 13C0

Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12

On Tuesday 16 June 2009, Steven M. Parrish wrote: The OLPC folks have made a commitment use Fedora as the base for future releases for not only the XO-1.0 but for the new XO-1.5 which is still in development. Does use Fedora as the base mean they'll be using binary packages as is from

Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12

Way back when in February [1], FESCo decided that for Fedora 11, i586 would be the default architecture, and for Fedora 12, it would be some variant of i686. It's time to follow through on that action item. I've submitted https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F12X86Support. It defines the

Re: KPackageKit fail

We are aware of the kpackagekit issue and are awaiting a release from the upstream developers. It should be released later today and after a bit of testing I will get it into the repo asap. SMP I'm testing Rawhide with latest updates and KPackageKit fails to do updates, I get this error

Re: Maintainer Responsibilities

Hello, I don't want to start a long thread, but just to ask a couple questions for my own clarification. Does a maintainer's responsibilities end with packaging bugs? IOW, if there is a problem in the package that is _broken code_ do they need to do something about it or is it acceptable for

Re: Dumbass KDE 4.2 Compilation Question

On Thursday 05 February 2009 15:58:10 homb...@tips-q.com wrote: I thought that I would compile kde 4.2 in developer mode. That is, the files are installed in the developer directory. Thus I can test KDE 4.2 in advance of installing it to the system. The question is, if I move the

Eclipse not working on F10

I am having an issue with Eclipse failing to start on F10. Here is what I am getting when running from konsole... CompilerOracle: exclude org/eclipse/core/internal/dtree/DataTreeNode.forwardDeltaWith CompilerOracle: exclude

Re: Eclipse not working on F10

On Tuesday 23 December 2008 09:10:48 Andrew Overholt wrote: * Steven M. Parrish smparr...@shallowcreek.net [2008-12-23 09:06]: I am having an issue with Eclipse failing to start on F10. Try running with the -clean option. If that doesn't work, try moving ~/.eclipse out of the way: mv

Re: Eclipse not working on F10

On Tuesday 23 December 2008 09:10:48 Andrew Overholt wrote: * Steven M. Parrish smparr...@shallowcreek.net [2008-12-23 09:06]: I am having an issue with Eclipse failing to start on F10. Try running with the -clean option. If that doesn't work, try moving ~/.eclipse out of the way: mv

Re: KDE 4.1 task bar.

On Tuesday 19 August 2008 07:45:57 am Mark Haney wrote: Well I've asked on a couple of other lists, but no luck so I'm hoping someone here knows the answer. I just moved to KDE4 and I want to get the default KDE3.5 task bar behaviour back. In other words I don't want listed on my taskbar