On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:35:33 +0300
Gilboa Davara wrote:
> Must likely a pulseaudio issue.
Definitely not pulseaudio. I've noticed it in fedoras predating
pulseaudio, and the first thing I do after installing
fedora is "yum remove pulseaudio" anyway :-).
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@r
On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 14:02 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:42:20 +0100
> Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > Anyway if you have a volume/quality difference its either in the megaton
> > of desktop plumbing or a funny in one of the AC97 or HDMI codec drivers
> > and in each case simply means
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 18:42:20 +0100
Alan Cox wrote:
> Anyway if you have a volume/quality difference its either in the megaton
> of desktop plumbing or a funny in one of the AC97 or HDMI codec drivers
> and in each case simply means you have some specific local configuration
> thats either broken s
> While playing with "tinycore linux", I installed OSS audio drivers for
> my onboard Intel HD audio. AMAZING IMPROVEMENT VS ALSA! With ALSA, I
> have to max the volume to hear anything, with OSS 20% volume was a
You have a set up problem of some kind then because they both talk to the
same har
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:01:20 -0700
john wendel wrote:
> Can someone explain why OSS was rejected by the Fedora team? License
> problem?
I always suspect the newer == better fallacy drives almost
all decision making :-).
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https:/
While playing with "tinycore linux", I installed OSS audio drivers for
my onboard Intel HD audio. AMAZING IMPROVEMENT VS ALSA! With ALSA, I
have to max the volume to hear anything, with OSS 20% volume was a
normal listening level. Everything that I tried sounded much better with
OSS. I'm seriou
