Wendell Nichols wrote:
> The main problem is the lack (for the moment) of a generally available
> 64 bit java plugin for firefox. This has just in the last few weeks
> been made available
IcedTea has shipped with a 64-bit plugin for a while so...
> but because it was unavailable for so long many
Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 22:40 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:45:26 +0800
> Meng Qiu wrote:
>
>> The "gears" for my GeForce4 MX440 on F10 is about 1700 FPS.
>> But the number for my HD1950pro on F11(pre) is never up to 100 FPS!
> 7
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 22:40 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:45:26 +0800
> Meng Qiu wrote:
>
>> The "gears" for my GeForce4 MX440 on F10 is about 1700 FPS.
>> But the number for my HD1950pro on F11(pre) is never up to 100 FPS!
> 7074 frames in 5.0 second
Frank Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:45:26 +0800
> Meng Qiu wrote:
>
>> The "gears" for my GeForce4 MX440 on F10 is about 1700 FPS.
>> But the number for my HD1950pro on F11(pre) is never up to 100 FPS!
>
> 7074 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1414.687 FPS
> 7103 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1420.448 FP
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> That's on an Intel mobo with a 2GHz Core 2 Duo and 4GB of RAM, using the
> *onboard* 82Q963/Q965 graphics chip. So either glxgears isn't a very
> representative benchmark, or installing one of these graphics cards is a
> waste of time. I'm not sure which.
Well, the GM9
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 22:40 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:45:26 +0800
> Meng Qiu wrote:
>
> > The "gears" for my GeForce4 MX440 on F10 is about 1700 FPS.
> > But the number for my HD1950pro on F11(pre) is never up to 100 FPS!
>
> 7074 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1414.687 FPS
> 7103
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:45:26 +0800
Meng Qiu wrote:
> The "gears" for my GeForce4 MX440 on F10 is about 1700 FPS.
> But the number for my HD1950pro on F11(pre) is never up to 100 FPS!
7074 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1414.687 FPS
7103 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1420.448 FPS
7102 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Craig White wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 11:26 +0800, Meng Qiu wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Petrus de Calguarium
> > wrote:
> > David Hláčik wrote:
> > > Will this sacrifice me ;)?
> > > David
> > I cannot
On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 11:26 +0800, Meng Qiu wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Petrus de Calguarium
> wrote:
> David Hláčik wrote:
> > Will this sacrifice me ;)?
> > David
> I cannot comment on the suitability of your graphic card or
> your int
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Petrus de Calguarium
wrote:
> David Hláčik wrote:
> > Will this sacrifice me ;)?
> > David
> I cannot comment on the suitability of your graphic card or your intended
> use of the system, nor do I know exactly how your T5550 @1,83Ghz, 4GB
> DDR2 compares to my Cor
David Hláčik wrote:
> Will this sacrifice me ;)?
> David
I cannot comment on the suitability of your graphic card or your intended
use of the system, nor do I know exactly how your T5550 @1,83Ghz, 4GB
DDR2 compares to my Core 2 Duo E6320 @1,86Ghz, 4GB DDR2, but I
switched in the last 2 days and
David Hláčik wrote:
> Intel Core Duo T5550 @1,83Ghz
The T5550 is actually a Core 2 Duo, not a Core Duo. This is important
because only the Core 2 series support x86_64. (So yes, the T5550 supports
64-bit operation and that's what I recommend using.)
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing l
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:08:33 +0800
萌邱 wrote:
> Just ONLY for your ATI card, the 32bit version is better.
> The driver for ATI, especially for Linux 64bit, is very poor!
I have an ATI card in my main desktop computer (this one) and F10 is the first
Fedora version that I have been able to use my wi
萌邱 wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 8:56 PM, David Hláčik wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> sorry for opening this neverending story again.
>>
>> I am about to reinstall Fedora 10 on my laptop.
>>
>> Asus F3Sr, ATI, 230GB disk 5400rpm, Intel Core Duo T5550 @1,83Ghz, 4GB DDR2
>> Ram
>>
>> I was using all
David Hláčik wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> sorry for opening this neverending story again.
>
> I am about to reinstall Fedora 10 on my laptop.
>
> Asus F3Sr, ATI, 230GB disk 5400rpm, Intel Core Duo T5550 @1,83Ghz, 4GB
> DDR2 Ram
>
> I was using all the time only 32bit version here all the time (with
>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 8:56 PM, David Hláčik wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> sorry for opening this neverending story again.
>
> I am about to reinstall Fedora 10 on my laptop.
>
> Asus F3Sr, ATI, 230GB disk 5400rpm, Intel Core Duo T5550 @1,83Ghz, 4GB DDR2
> Ram
>
> I was using all the time only 32bit ver
Hi guys,
sorry for opening this neverending story again.
I am about to reinstall Fedora 10 on my laptop.
Asus F3Sr, ATI, 230GB disk 5400rpm, Intel Core Duo T5550 @1,83Ghz, 4GB DDR2
Ram
I was using all the time only 32bit version here all the time (with
kernel-pae).
My question is , should
17 matches
Mail list logo
