Alan Cox wrote:
regardless the difference between X and no X in each version/hardware is
astounding! what are the reasons for this, your not telling me that X is
chewing up that much cpu cycles to turn a 1minute 40sec operation into a
4minute 53sec one?
Why do you assume this has anything to
On Tuesday, Mar 24th 2009 at 08:14 -, quoth Alan Cox:
=>> regardless the difference between X and no X in each version/hardware is
=>> astounding! what are the reasons for this, your not telling me that X is
=>> chewing up that much cpu cycles to turn a 1minute 40sec operation into a
=>> 4m
> regardless the difference between X and no X in each version/hardware is
> astounding! what are the reasons for this, your not telling me that X is
> chewing up that much cpu cycles to turn a 1minute 40sec operation into a
> 4minute 53sec one?
Why do you assume this has anything to do with CP
Alan Cox wrote:
I've got boxes at home running FC6, F8, and F10. The FC6 box is an old
AMD Athlon 2Ghz 1.5GB memory, the F8 box is a P4 3 Ghz 2GB memory, and
the F10 box is an Intel Core2 2.2 Ghz 4GB memory.
For the test, I created a 1,000,000 line (80 byte lines, 80 MB) text
file and timed "c
> I've got boxes at home running FC6, F8, and F10. The FC6 box is an old
> AMD Athlon 2Ghz 1.5GB memory, the F8 box is a P4 3 Ghz 2GB memory, and
> the F10 box is an Intel Core2 2.2 Ghz 4GB memory.
>
> For the test, I created a 1,000,000 line (80 byte lines, 80 MB) text
> file and timed "cat fi
I first noticed the X slowdown when I installed F8. I've used every
version of Fedora, and I noticed that the user experience with F8 was
not as smooth as earlier versions. I spend most of my day hacking code
in vi, so 2D video performance is important to me. I care nothing about
3D video.
Whe
