On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 16:24 -0400, Mike Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 03:10 -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 10:27 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 09:41 -
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 03:10 -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 10:27 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 09:41 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 18:05 -043
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 03:10 -0400, Ric Moore wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 10:27 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 09:41 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 18:05 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 17:01 -0500, Aaron Konsta
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 10:27 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 09:41 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 18:05 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 17:01 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 16:06 +0100, Paul Smi
Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 18:05 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 17:01 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 16:06 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
Dear All,
In the output below, where should I look for the CPU temperature? The value
CPU Temp:
g wrote:
Mike Williams wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just to be clear, my system is fine using lm_sensors, it's Paul's that
has the problem. My mobo is Intel, his is Gigabyte.
Thanks all the same.
Understood, just an unfortunate bit of
Dear All,
As I wrote here, I went to post a question about my problem in the
lm-sensors mailing list, and I was told that, in the case of my
motherboard, temp3 corresponds to the CPU temperature. Check the
detailed reply at
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2008-June/023390.html
P
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 09:41 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 18:05 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 17:01 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 16:06 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> > > > Dear All,
> > > >
> > > > In the output below, wher
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 18:06 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 17:02 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 16:23 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Mark Haney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> In the output below, where should I
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 18:05 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 17:01 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 16:06 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> > > Dear All,
> > >
> > > In the output below, where should I look for the CPU temperature? The
> > > value
> > >
> >
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:02:53 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > >> Is there some other program to check the CPU temperature?
> > >>
> > > cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THRM/temperature
> > >
> > > This is what I use to check temps if I feel like my sensors widget is not
> > > right.
> >
> > Thanks, Ma
Mike Williams wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just to be clear, my system is fine using lm_sensors, it's Paul's that
has the problem. My mobo is Intel, his is Gigabyte.
Thanks all the same.
Understood, just an unfortunate bit of snipping
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to be clear, my system is fine using lm_sensors, it's Paul's that
> has the problem. My mobo is Intel, his is Gigabyte.
>
> Thanks all the same.
Understood, just an unfortunate bit of snipping in my message.
Sta
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 18:56 -0400, Mike Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 17:02 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 16:23 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:18 PM, M
Paul Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Markku Kolkka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
$ sensors
it8712-isa-0290
Adapter: ISA adapter
M/B Temp:-55.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C)
sensor = transistor CPU Temp: -2.0°C (low = +127.0°C,
high = +127.0°C) sensor = transistor T
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Paul Smith wrote:
Thanks, Patrick. With 'sensors-detect', I get the following:
Some CPUs or memory controllers may also contain embedded sensors.
Do you want to scan for them? (YES/no):
AMD K8 thermal sensors... No
AMD K10 thermal se
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 17:02 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 16:23 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Mark Haney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >> In the output below,
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 17:02 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 16:23 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Mark Haney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> In the output below, where should I look for the CPU temperature? The
> > >> value
> > >>
> > >> CPU Temp:
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 17:01 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 16:06 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > In the output below, where should I look for the CPU temperature? The value
> >
> > CPU Temp: -2.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor =
> > transist
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 22:51 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Carroll Grigsby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> $ sensors
> >> >> it8712-isa-0290
> >> >> Adapter: ISA adapter
> >> >> M/B Temp:-55.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C)
> >> >> sensor = transistor CPU
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 21:51 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > You should never get a negative temperature reading. With the exception
> >> > of
> >> > military grade equipment, very little equipment is rated to opera
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 16:23 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Mark Haney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> In the output below, where should I look for the CPU temperature? The
> >> value
> >>
> >> CPU Temp: -2.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor =
> >> trans
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 16:06 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> In the output below, where should I look for the CPU temperature? The value
>
> CPU Temp: -2.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = transistor
>
> seems unlikely. Or is -2.0°C realistic?
>
> Is there some other
Paul Smith wrote:
I guess Mikkel's guess is not correct, as I can see the CPU
temperature when within the BIOS setup. My motherboard has to have
such a temperature sensors, as otherwise the BIOS could not get the
CPU temperature. Probably, something is not working properly on Fedora
side.
How ma
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Carroll Grigsby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> $ sensors
>> >> it8712-isa-0290
>> >> Adapter: ISA adapter
>> >> M/B Temp:-55.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C)
>> >> sensor = transistor CPU Temp: -2.0°C (low = +127.0°C,
>> >> high = +127.0°C) sens
On Wednesday 11 June 2008 5:13:56 pm Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Markku Kolkka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> $ sensors
> >> it8712-isa-0290
> >> Adapter: ISA adapter
> >> M/B Temp:-55.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C)
> >> sensor = transistor CPU Temp: -2.0
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Markku Kolkka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> $ sensors
>> it8712-isa-0290
>> Adapter: ISA adapter
>> M/B Temp:-55.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C)
>> sensor = transistor CPU Temp: -2.0°C (low = +127.0°C,
>> high = +127.0°C) sensor = transistor Temp
Paul Smith kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika keskiviikko, 11.
kesäkuuta 2008):
>
> $ sensors
> it8712-isa-0290
> Adapter: ISA adapter
> M/B Temp:-55.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C)
> sensor = transistor CPU Temp: -2.0°C (low = +127.0°C,
> high = +127.0°C) sensor = transistor
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > You should never get a negative temperature reading. With the exception of
>> > military grade equipment, very little equipment is rated to operate below
>> > the freezing point of water.
>> >
>> > The fact that se
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 21:23 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> 2008/6/11 Mikkel L. Ellertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > You should never get a negative temperature reading. With the exception of
> > military grade equipment, very little equipment is rated to operate below
> > the freezing point of water.
> >
2008/6/11 Mikkel L. Ellertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You should never get a negative temperature reading. With the exception of
> military grade equipment, very little equipment is rated to operate below
> the freezing point of water.
>
> The fact that sensor-detect did not find any temperature det
Paul Smith wrote:
Thanks, Patrick. With 'sensors-detect', I get the following:
Some CPUs or memory controllers may also contain embedded sensors.
Do you want to scan for them? (YES/no):
AMD K8 thermal sensors... No
AMD K10 thermal sensors...
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 18:50 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >>> I have just installed acpi with
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> yum install acpi
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 18:50 +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >>> I have just installed acpi with
> >> >>>
> >> >>> yum install acpi
> >> >>>
> >> >>> but
> >> >>>
> >> >>> # cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THRM/temperature
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>> I have just installed acpi with
>> >>>
>> >>> yum install acpi
>> >>>
>> >>> but
>> >>>
>> >>> # cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THRM/temperature
>> >>> cat: /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THRM/temperature: No such file or
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Timothy Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there some other program to check the CPU temperature?
>
cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THRM/temperature
This is what I use to check temps if I feel like my sensors widget is
not right.
>>>
>>>
Mark Haney wrote:
Is there some other program to check the CPU temperature?
>>> cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THRM/temperature
>>>
>>> This is what I use to check temps if I feel like my sensors widget is
>>> not right.
>>
>> Thanks, Mark, but
>>
>> $ cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THRM/te
Paul Smith wrote:
Dear All,
In the output below, where should I look for the CPU temperature? The value
CPU Temp: -2.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = transistor
seems unlikely. Or is -2.0°C realistic?
Is there some other program to check the CPU temperature?
Thanks in ad
On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 11:57 -0400, Don Levey wrote:
> Paul Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Mark Haney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> I have just installed acpi with
> >>>
> >>> yum install acpi
> >>>
> >>> but
> >>>
> >>> # cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THRM/temperature
> >>> cat:
Mark Haney wrote:
cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THRM/temperature
This is what I use to check temps if I feel like my sensors widget is
not right.
This does not work with all systems. Also, you may have THRM0 and
THRM1 if you are running a dual core or 2 processors.
Mikkel
--
Do not meddle
Paul Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Mark Haney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have just installed acpi with
yum install acpi
but
# cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THRM/temperature
cat: /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THRM/temperature: No such file or directory
# dir /proc/acpi/thermal_zone
#
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Mark Haney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THRM/temperature
>
> This is what I use to check temps if I feel like my sensors widget is
> not
> right.
Thanks, Mark, but
$ cat /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/THRM
Paul Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Mark Haney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the output below, where should I look for the CPU temperature? The
value
CPU Temp: -2.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor =
transistor
seems unlikely. Or is -2.0°C realistic?
Is there s
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Mark Haney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the output below, where should I look for the CPU temperature? The
value
CPU Temp: -2.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor =
transistor
seems unlikely. Or is -2.0°C realistic?
Paul Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Mark Haney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the output below, where should I look for the CPU temperature? The
value
CPU Temp: -2.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor =
transistor
seems unlikely. Or is -2.0°C realistic?
Is there s
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Mark Haney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In the output below, where should I look for the CPU temperature? The
>> value
>>
>> CPU Temp: -2.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor =
>> transistor
>>
>> seems unlikely. Or is -2.0°C realistic?
>>
>> Is ther
Paul Smith wrote:
Dear All,
In the output below, where should I look for the CPU temperature? The value
CPU Temp: -2.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = transistor
seems unlikely. Or is -2.0°C realistic?
Is there some other program to check the CPU temperature?
Thanks in ad
Dear All,
In the output below, where should I look for the CPU temperature? The value
CPU Temp: -2.0°C (low = +127.0°C, high = +127.0°C) sensor = transistor
seems unlikely. Or is -2.0°C realistic?
Is there some other program to check the CPU temperature?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
$ se
48 matches
Mail list logo
