Simon Slater wrote:
Is there any overlap in the functions of NIS, bind and LDAP? Or are
these mutually exclusive?
I would be surprised if you needed either NIS or LDAP for a SOHO
network. However, I would say NIS and LDAP are similar, but bind (i.e.
DNS) serves a fundamentally different
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 03:55 -0500, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
Simon Slater wrote:
Is there any overlap in the functions of NIS, bind and LDAP? Or are
these mutually exclusive?
I would be surprised if you needed either NIS or LDAP for a SOHO
network. However, I would say NIS and LDAP
Simon Slater wrote:
Thanks Matt. I saw dnsmasq mentioned in one how-to but didn't chase it
since I was focussing on DHCP and bind.
DHCP is a protocol and bind is an implementation (of DNS, mainly).
You're comparing apples to orchardists.
Now there are half a dozen
boxes, but will increase
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 06:39 -0500, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
Simon Slater wrote:
Thanks Matt. I saw dnsmasq mentioned in one how-to but didn't chase it
since I was focussing on DHCP and bind.
DHCP is a protocol and bind is an implementation (of DNS, mainly).
You're comparing apples to
Simon Slater wrote:
G'day all,
I've been setting up a SOHO network, switching things over from
a
labour intensive /etc/hosts based system to a more automated setup.
With much reading I think I can't see the wood for the trees any more.
I have found a lot of
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Otherwise, you need a local BIND
server, use Webmin to maintain it. I am very experienced with BIND, and
still use Webmin.
Why exactly do you think he needs BIND?
Matt Flaschen
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
Matthew Flaschen wrote:
Depends how small, of course. But I would think a simple DNS/DHCP
server like dnsmasq is reasonable for such a network. See
http://www.linux.com/articles/149040 for a good start.
Matt Flaschen
I also use dnsmasq as well. One thing to keep in mind is that you
Matthew Flaschen wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Otherwise, you need a local BIND
server, use Webmin to maintain it. I am very experienced with BIND, and
still use Webmin.
Why exactly do you think he needs BIND?
If he has internal servers that local hosts need access to.
For
If he has internal servers that local hosts need access to.
For example. If he is running an Netbios server and the clients need to
access shares on it.
Right.
He does not want the world to know about this NAS,
Obviously.
plus it probably has an RFC1918 address.
I would definitely
Flaschen, Matthew S wrote:
If he has internal servers that local hosts need access to.
For example. If he is running an Netbios server and the clients need to
access shares on it.
Right.
He does not want the world to know about this NAS,
Obviously.
plus it
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 12:34 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Flaschen, Matthew S wrote:
If he has internal servers that local hosts need access to.
At the moment one server offering limited services internally, nothing
external.
For example. If he is running an Netbios server and
Simon Slater wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 12:34 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Flaschen, Matthew S wrote:
If he has internal servers that local hosts need access to.
At the moment one server offering limited services internally, nothing
external.
For
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 15:57 -0500, Flaschen, Matthew S wrote:
Now I've caught up on some sleep I can continue with a clearer head.
The single server has 2 nics, one internal the other to the dsl
router.
For now internal name resolution and dhcp is the issue, but more
internal services
G'day all,
I've been setting up a SOHO network, switching things over from
a
labour intensive /etc/hosts based system to a more automated setup.
With much reading I think I can't see the wood for the trees any more.
I have found a lot of material on the individual
14 matches
Mail list logo
