Re: Default BIND setup question

2008-12-04 Thread Tim
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 10:38 -0500, Mark Haney wrote: > I just installed F10 on what will be my new slave DNS server for our > office and I'm a little peeved at the default setup. The base install > sets BIND up as a local caching-nameserver. Which I suppose is fine, > except there's no base nam

Re: Default BIND setup question

2008-12-04 Thread Tim
Seann Clark: > mind that BIND is run in a CHROOT jail, so you have both > an /etc/named.conf and a /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf to look > over. The name server will not use the /etc one, it's best ignored, but some configuration tools still do (or used to), so the usual solution is to make a l

Re: [SPAM]Re: Default BIND setup question

2008-12-04 Thread Mark Haney
Todd Zullinger wrote: Mark Haney wrote: I just installed F10 on what will be my new slave DNS server for our office and I'm a little peeved at the default setup. The base install sets BIND up as a local caching-nameserver. Which I suppose is fine, except there's no base named.conf provided f

Re: [SPAM]Re: Default BIND setup question

2008-12-04 Thread Mark Haney
Seann Clark wrote: Mark Haney wrote: I just installed F10 on what will be my new slave DNS server for our office and I'm a little peeved at the default setup. The base install sets BIND up as a local caching-nameserver. Which I suppose is fine, except there's no base named.conf provided for

Re: Default BIND setup question

2008-12-04 Thread Todd Zullinger
Mark Haney wrote: > I just installed F10 on what will be my new slave DNS server for our > office and I'm a little peeved at the default setup. The base > install sets BIND up as a local caching-nameserver. Which I > suppose is fine, except there's no base named.conf provided for > setting up B

Re: Default BIND setup question

2008-12-04 Thread Seann Clark
Mark Haney wrote: I just installed F10 on what will be my new slave DNS server for our office and I'm a little peeved at the default setup. The base install sets BIND up as a local caching-nameserver. Which I suppose is fine, except there's no base named.conf provided for setting up BIND as a

Default BIND setup question

2008-12-04 Thread Mark Haney
I just installed F10 on what will be my new slave DNS server for our office and I'm a little peeved at the default setup. The base install sets BIND up as a local caching-nameserver. Which I suppose is fine, except there's no base named.conf provided for setting up BIND as a real DNS server,